Notebookcheck Logo

Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz vs Amlogic AML8726-MX

Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz

► remove from comparison  RK3066

Der Rockchip RK3066 ist ein günstiger SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er bietet zwei ARM Cortex-A9 CPU Kerne mit NEON Erweiterungen, eine ARM Mali 400MP4 (Quad-Core mit 250 MHz getaktet) Grafikkarte und einen Video De- und Encoder. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt maximal 2 GB DDR1-3.

Weitere Features lt Wikipedia

  • VPU (Video Processing Unit) Multi-Media Processor supporting 1080p image and video decoding
  • HDMI 1.4 Interface
  • 2-channels TFT LCD Interface with 5 layers and 3D Display (1920×1080 Maximum Display Size)
  • USB 2.0 Interface
  • SD/MMC Interface

Amlogic AML8726-MX

► remove from comparison

Der Amlogic AML8726-M ist ein günstiger SoC für Tablets und Smartphones aus 2012. Er integriert zwei ARM Cortex-A9 Kerne (max. 1,5 GHz) mit NEON Erweiterung und eine ARM Mali-400 MP2 Grafikkarte. Auch 1080p Video Dekodierung wird von dem Chip unterstützt.

ModelRockchip RK3066 1.5 GHzAmlogic AML8726-MX
Series
Serie:
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHzcores
Apple A6 compare1 GHzcores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz « 1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST comparecores
unknown compare cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHzcores
Apple A6 compare1 GHzcores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX « 1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST comparecores
unknown compare cores
Clock1500 MHz1500 MHz
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
Technology40 nm45 nm
FeaturesMali-400 MP4, Single Channel DDR3 Memory ControllerNEON, VFP, Cortex-A9
iGPUARM Mali-400 MP4 (250 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.rock-chips.comwww.amlogic.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 RK3066 +
min: 4687     avg: 4990     median: 5059 (4%)     max: 5161 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 RK3066 +
4890 Points (4%)
min: 267     avg: 268.5     median: 268.5 (2%)     max: 270 Points
min: 958     avg: 963     median: 963 (9%)     max: 968 Points
min: 1409     avg: 1451     median: 1450.5 (3%)     max: 1492 Points
min: 825     avg: 840     median: 839.5 (2%)     max: 854 Points
min: 1000     avg: 1021     median: 1020.5 (3%)     max: 1041 Points
min: 63.9     avg: 86.6     median: 84.2 (3%)     max: 111.8 MFLOPS
min: 50.7     avg: 57.9     median: 52.9 (5%)     max: 70.1 MFLOPS
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3066 +
1959 ms (21%)
min: 1243     avg: 1336     median: 1252 (12%)     max: 1513 ms
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 3105     avg: 3862     median: 3974 (9%)     max: 4257 points
min: 3947     avg: 4055     median: 4055 (9%)     max: 4163 points
min: 4082     avg: 4886     median: 4886 (32%)     max: 5690 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 RK3066 +
5852 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Amlogic AML8726-MX → 101% n=10

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 27. 05:21:10

#0 checking url part for id 3576 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3611 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.129s ... 0.13s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.13s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3576 +0.004s ... 0.134s

#7 got single benchmarks 3576 +0.033s ... 0.167s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3611 +0.003s ... 0.171s

#9 got single benchmarks 3611 +0.012s ... 0.183s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.183s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.081s ... 0.263s

#12 return log +0.036s ... 0.299s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)