Notebookcheck Logo

Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz vs WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 vs DK3.5+ST

Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz

► remove from comparison  RK3066

Der Rockchip RK3066 ist ein günstiger SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er bietet zwei ARM Cortex-A9 CPU Kerne mit NEON Erweiterungen, eine ARM Mali 400MP4 (Quad-Core mit 250 MHz getaktet) Grafikkarte und einen Video De- und Encoder. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt maximal 2 GB DDR1-3.

Weitere Features lt Wikipedia

  • VPU (Video Processing Unit) Multi-Media Processor supporting 1080p image and video decoding
  • HDMI 1.4 Interface
  • 2-channels TFT LCD Interface with 5 layers and 3D Display (1920×1080 Maximum Display Size)
  • USB 2.0 Interface
  • SD/MMC Interface

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison  WM8950

Der VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 ist ein günstiger Einsteiger-SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er ist hauptsächlich für Android 4.x und Windows CE gedacht und bietet folgende Komponenten: 

  • Einzelkern Cortex-A9 Prozessor mit 1GHz Taktrate
  • ARM Mali 400(MP2?) Grafikkarte
  • Multi-Standard 1080p Video Decoding, H.264 Video Encoding
  • DDR3/LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller
  • Hardware Security Engine

ModelRockchip RK3066 1.5 GHzWonderMedia PRIZM WM8950DK3.5+ST
Series Huawei
Serie:
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz « 1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown cores
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST « cores
unknown cores
Clock1500 MHz1000 MHz
L2 Cache512 KB
Cores / Threads2 / 21 / 12
Technology40 nm
FeaturesMali-400 MP4, Single Channel DDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-400 MP4 (250 MHz)ARM Mali-400 MP
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.rock-chips.comwww.wondermedia.com.tw
CodenameCortex-A9

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 RK3066 +
min: 4687     avg: 4990     median: 5059 (4%)     max: 5161 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 RK3066 +
4890 Points (4%)
37%
1 WM8950 +
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
68%
1 WM8950 +
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3066 +
1959 ms (21%)
56%
1 WM8950 +
2410 ms (23%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 RK3066 +
min: 3105     avg: 3862     median: 3974 (9%)     max: 4257 points
54%
1 WM8950 +
2140 points (5%)
34%
1 WM8950 +
1282 Points (8%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 RK3066 +
5852 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 01. 01:00:57

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3576 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 12765 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1730419256s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 05:16:23 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.056s ... 0.056s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.056s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3576 +0.001s ... 0.057s

#9 got single benchmarks 3576 +0.01s ... 0.066s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0.001s ... 0.067s

#11 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.003s ... 0.07s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12765 +0.001s ... 0.071s

#13 got single benchmarks 12765 +0.003s ... 0.074s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.074s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.083s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.083s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)