Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2500 vs Loongson 2F 900MHz

Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2500

Der Wear 2500 ist ein kleiner ARM Cortex-A7 Quad-Core für Smartwatches der die CPU-Kerne mit bis zu 1,2 GHz taktet. Der SoC wird in 28nm gefertigt und integriert ein X5 LTE Modem. Im Vergleich zum Wear 2100 bietet der 2500 Qualcomm Aqstic Audio Support.

Loongson 2F 900MHz

show full text
ModelQualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2500Loongson 2F 900MHz
SeriesQualcomm
CodenameARM Cortex-A7
Serie:
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 3100 compare - 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARM Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2500 « - 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARM Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2100 compare - 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARM Cortex-A7
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHz2 cores
Apple A6 compare1 GHz2 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz « 0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST compare2 cores
unknown compare cores
Clock <=1200 MHz900 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 41 / 1
Technology28 nm
FeaturesLPDDR3-400 Memory Controller, eMMC 4.5, USB 2.0, Beidou, Galileo, GLONASS, gPS, Adreno 304 GPU, Bluetooth 4.2
ArchitectureARMMIPS
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com
L2 Cache512 KB
TDP4 Watt

Benchmarks

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 09:39:03

#0 checking url part for id 13232 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 480 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:21:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.119s ... 0.12s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.12s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13232 +0.004s ... 0.124s

#7 got single benchmarks 13232 +0.001s ... 0.124s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 480 +0.003s ... 0.127s

#9 got single benchmarks 480 +0.01s ... 0.137s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.137s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.137s

#12 return log +0.039s ... 0.176s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)