Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2500 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 3100

Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2500

Der Wear 2500 ist ein kleiner ARM Cortex-A7 Quad-Core für Smartwatches der die CPU-Kerne mit bis zu 1,2 GHz taktet. Der SoC wird in 28nm gefertigt und integriert ein X5 LTE Modem. Im Vergleich zum Wear 2100 bietet der 2500 Qualcomm Aqstic Audio Support.

Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 3100

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2500Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 3100
SeriesQualcomm Qualcomm
CodenameARM Cortex-A7ARM Cortex-A7
Serie: ARM Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 3100 - 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARM Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2500 « - 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARM Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2100 compare - 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARM Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 3100 « - 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARM Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2500 - 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARM Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2100 compare - 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARM Cortex-A7
Clock <=1200 MHz <=1200 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
Technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesLPDDR3-400 Memory Controller, eMMC 4.5, USB 2.0, Beidou, Galileo, GLONASS, gPS, Adreno 304 GPU, Bluetooth 4.2LPDDR3-400 Memory Controller, eMMC 4.5, USB 2.0, Beidou, Galileo, GLONASS, gPS, Adreno 304 GPU, Bluetooth 4.2
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 304 (200 MHz)

Benchmarks

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 17098     avg: 19182     median: 19182 (22%)     max: 21266 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 2289     avg: 3142     median: 2997 (33%)     max: 4139 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 1522     avg: 1691     median: 1730 (2%)     max: 1821 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 3100 → 0% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 22. 16:16:00

#0 checking url part for id 13232 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12638 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 May 2024 05:37:27 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.086s ... 0.087s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.087s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13232 +0.003s ... 0.09s

#7 got single benchmarks 13232 +0.001s ... 0.09s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12638 +0.003s ... 0.093s

#9 got single benchmarks 12638 +0.012s ... 0.105s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.105s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.116s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.141s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)