, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Apple A5 vs Texas Instruments OMAP 4470

Apple A5

► remove from comparison

Der Apple A5 ist ein Dual Core ARM Prozessor mit Corex A9 basierenden Rechenkernen. Sie sind beide im iPad 2 und iPad Mini mit maximal 1000 MHz getaktet. Im iPhone jedoch nur mit 900 Mhz. Im SoC integriert ist die relativ schnelle PowerVR SGX 543MP2 Grafikkarte. Im selben Package befinden sich 512MB RAM (beim iPad 2).

Verwendet wird der Chip z.B. beim Apple iPad 2, 2,5 und iPhone 4s Tablet und Apple wirbt mit bis zu 2x Rechenleistung im Vergleich zum 1 GHz A4 Single Core. Gefertigt wurde der A5 anfangs noch in 40nm. Mit dem erscheinen des iPad 3, kam im iPad 2 aber eine 32nm Variante zum Einsatz, welche wahrscheinlich auch im iPad Mini eingesetzt wird.

Texas Instruments OMAP 4470

► remove from comparison  OMAP 4470

Der Texas Instruments (TI) OMAP 4470 ist ein SoC (System on a Chip) für Handys und Tablet PCs. Er beinhaltet zwei ARM Cortex-A9 (ARM v7 Instruction Set) Rechenkernen mit 1.3-1.8 GHz und ARMs SIMD Engine NEON. Zusätzlich sind zwei ARM Cortex-M3 Kerne  Die integrierte PowerVR SGX540 Grafikkarte wird mit 277-384 MHz getaktet und kann wie die zwei Prozessorkerne auf den Dual Channel LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller (max 400MHz) zugreifen. Weiters ist eine Vivante CGPU für 2D Aufgaben verbaut. Im Vergleich zum OMAP 4430, ist beim 4460 daher CPU und GPU Teil höher getaktet.

ModelApple A5Texas Instruments OMAP 4470
SeriesApple
CodenameCortex A9Cortex A9
Serie: Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 44701.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4460 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Broadcom BCM28155 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4430 compare1 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Apple A5x compare1 GHz2 Cortex A9
» Apple A51 GHz2 Cortex A9
» Texas Instruments OMAP 44701.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4460 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Broadcom BCM28155 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4430 compare1 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Apple A5x compare1 GHz2 Cortex A9
Apple A51 GHz2 Cortex A9
Clock1000 MHz1500 MHz
Cores / Threads22 / 2
Technology40, 32 nm45 nm
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
L1 Cache1 MB
FeaturesDual Channel LPDDR 400MHz Memory Controller, IVA 3 Multimedia Accelerator, PowerVR SGX 540 Graphics Core, Image Signal Processor

Benchmarks

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
A5 +
min: 297     avg: 318     median: 323 (3%)     max: 333 Points
min: 436     avg: 438     median: 438 (4%)     max: 440 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
A5 +
min: 751     avg: 807     median: 833 (8%)     max: 838 Points
min: 1302     avg: 1326     median: 1325.5 (12%)     max: 1349 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
A5 +
min: 737     avg: 855     median: 906 (2%)     max: 923 Points
min: 1895     avg: 1929     median: 1929 (4%)     max: 1963 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
A5 +
min: 552     avg: 638     median: 671 (1%)     max: 691 Points
min: 1118     avg: 1136     median: 1135.5 (2%)     max: 1153 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
A5 +
min: 631     avg: 715     median: 750 (2%)     max: 764 Points
min: 1367     avg: 1381     median: 1381 (4%)     max: 1395 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
A5 +
min: 124.4     avg: 127     median: 127.1 (4%)     max: 129.84 MFLOPS
min: 80.548     avg: 87.6     median: 87.6 (3%)     max: 94.597 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
A5 +
min: 78.14     avg: 81.8     median: 81.8 (8%)     max: 85.4 MFLOPS
min: 52.527     avg: 55.4     median: 55.4 (5%)     max: 58.339 MFLOPS
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
A5 +
min: 1556.8     avg: 1863     median: 1888.6 (18%)     max: 2118 ms
min: 1437.9     avg: 1497     median: 1496.8 (14%)     max: 1555.7 ms
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 2747     avg: 3447     median: 3447 (8%)     max: 4147 points

Average Benchmarks Apple A5 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Texas Instruments OMAP 4470 → 138% n=8

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 22. 10:14:19

#0 checking url part for id 2331 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3647 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:10:47 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.035s ... 0.037s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.041s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#12 composed specs +0s ... 0.041s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.041s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 2331 +0s ... 0.042s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#16 got single benchmarks 2331 +0.006s ... 0.048s

#17 getting avg benchmarks for device 3647 +0s ... 0.049s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.05s

#20 got single benchmarks 3647 +0.005s ... 0.055s

#21 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.055s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.055s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.058s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.059s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.06s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#60 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.061s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#62 return log +0.004s ... 0.065s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)