Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 225 vs Qualcomm Adreno 205

Qualcomm Adreno 225

► remove from comparison

Der Qualcomm Adreno 225 ist eine in Snapdragon S4 (Krait) integrierte Grafikkarte für Smartphones und Tablets. Sie basiert auf die ältere Adreno 220, bietet jedoch Direct3D 9_3 Support. Durch den 28nm Prozess konnte die Taktrate von 266 auf 400 MHz erhöht werden.

Der Adreno 225 bietet 8 SIMds mit 4 MADs pro SIMD und soll dadurch 12.8 GFLOPS bei 200 MHz Takt schaffen (25.6 GFLOPS bei den anvisierten 400 MHz).

Qualcomm Adreno 205

► remove from comparison

Die Qualcomm Adreno 205 ist eine integrierte Grafikkarte in den MSM7x30, MSM8x55 und APQ8055 SoCs. Sie unterstützt OpenGL ES 2.0, OpenVG 1.1, EGL 1.3, Direct3D Mobile, SVGT 1.2, DirectDraw und GDI. Im Vergleich zur Adreno 200, bietet die 205 Hardware-beschleunigte SVG und Flash Darstellung und eine bessere Shader Performance.

Zu Einsatz kommt bei der Adreno 205 eine 5-way VLIW (4xALU) Architektur.

Die Leistung wird mit bis zu 57 M Trianlges/Sekunde und 539M Pixel/Sekunde bei Taktraten von bis zu 245 MHz angegeben.

Quelle: Wikipedia

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 225Qualcomm Adreno 205
Adreno 200 Serie
Adreno 225 8 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 220 compare 8 @ 0.27 GHz
Adreno 205 4 @ 0.25 GHz
Adreno 203 compare 4 @ 0.25 GHz
Adreno 200 compare 2 @ 0.13 GHz
Adreno 225 8 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 220 compare 8 @ 0.27 GHz
Adreno 205 4 @ 0.25 GHz
Adreno 203 compare 4 @ 0.25 GHz
Adreno 200 compare 2 @ 0.13 GHz
Pipelines8 - unified4 - unified
Kerntakt400 MHz245 MHz
Shared Memoryjaja
APIOpenGL ES 2.0OpenGL ES 2.0
Herstellungsprozess45 nm45 nm
Erscheinungsdatum27.02.2012 06.09.2010
Herstellerseitehttps://developer.qualcomm.com/discover/...
CPU in Adreno 225GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus APQ8060A2 x 1500 MHz266 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM89602 x 1500 - 1700 MHz400 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A2 x 1700 MHz400 MHz? MHz
min. - max.266 - 400 MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 205GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM82551 x 1500 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
4969 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
2706 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
5402 Points (1%)
GLBenchmark 2.5 - GLBench 2.5 Egypt HD Offscreen
min: 6.5     avg: 9.7     median: 10 (2%)     max: 12 fps
GLBenchmark 2.5 - GLBench 2.5 Egypt HD
min: 13     avg: 17.2     median: 16.5 (28%)     max: 25 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 225
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
min: 5.9     avg: 6.1     median: 6.1 (0%)     max: 6.3 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 225
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 2.9     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (0%)     max: 3.6 fps
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 28.25     avg: 38.6     median: 38.5 (64%)     max: 49.14 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 5989     avg: 6046     median: 6045.5 (13%)     max: 6102 Points
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 58.8     avg: 59.5     median: 59.9 (89%)     max: 60.1 fps
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 2487     avg: 2839     median: 2776.5 (60%)     max: 3314 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 225 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 27. 03:29:44

#0 checking url part for id 3142 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2956 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:25:51 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.045s ... 0.046s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.046s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#9 composed specs +0s ... 0.047s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.047s

#11 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.047s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3142 +0.029s ... 0.076s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.077s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.078s

#17 got single benchmarks 3142 +0.01s ... 0.088s

#18 getting avg benchmarks for device 2956 +0s ... 0.088s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#21 got single benchmarks 2956 +0.004s ... 0.093s

#22 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.093s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.093s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.094s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.095s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.097s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.098s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#53 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.098s

#54 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.098s

#55 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.102s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.103s

#57 return log +0.002s ... 0.106s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)