Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Athlon II Neo K125 vs AMD Athlon II Neo K325

AMD Athlon II Neo K125

► remove from comparison

Der AMD Athlon II Neo K125 Prozessor ist ein Einstiegs-Einkernprozessor der Nile Plattform. Er bietet einen integrierten DDR3-1066 Speicherkontroller und einen HyperTransport 3.0 Link mit 2000 MHz.

Die Performance ist auf dem Niveau eines gleichgetakteten Pentium M / Core Solo und dadurch etwas schneller als die Atom Prozessoren aus Intel basierten Netbooks.

AMD Athlon II Neo K325

► remove from comparison

Der AMD Athlon II X2 Neo K325 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für Subnotebooks. Er bietet einen integrierten Speicherkontroller für DDR3 (max DDR3-1066) und unterstützt Hardware Virtualisierungsfunktionen. Der einzelne 16-Bit HyperTransport 3.0 Link wird mit 1000 MHz getaktet (deshalb von AMD als 2000 MHz Systembus angegeben). Gefertigt wird die CPU im 45nm SOI Verfahren.

Im Vergleich zu den schnelleren Turion II Neo Prozessoren (K625 und K665) bietet die Athlon II Neo Serien nur eine 64-Bit Floating Point Recheneinheit (Turion 128-Bit).

Die Performance ist aufgrund der geringen Taktung beider Kerne (kein Turbo Boost) und dem kleinen Cache vergleichbar mit einem Celeron U3400 (Arrandale) mit 1 GHz und daher nur für anspruchslose Aufgaben ausreichend.

show full text
ModelAMD Athlon II Neo K125AMD Athlon II Neo K325
SeriesAMD Athlon II NeoAMD Athlon II Neo
CodenameGenevaGeneva
Serie: Athlon II Neo Geneva
AMD Athlon II Neo K3251.3 GHz2 / 2
» AMD Athlon II Neo K1251.7 GHz1 / 1
» AMD Athlon II Neo K3251.3 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon II Neo K1251.7 GHz1 / 1
Clock1700 MHz1300 MHz
FSB20002000
L1 Cache128 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 12 / 2
TDP12 Watt12 Watt
Technology45 nm45 nm
SocketS1S1
FeaturesMMX, 3dDNow!, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, integrated DDR3 memory controllerDDR3 memory controller, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, PowerNow, HyperTransport 3.0
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerAMD Athlon II Neo K125AMD Athlon II Neo K325

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
K125 +
0.5 Points (1%)
157%
K325 +
min: 0.7     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (1%)     max: 0.71 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
K125 +
min: 1464     avg: 1494     median: 1491 (13%)     max: 1528 Points
min: 1108     avg: 1113     median: 1111 (10%)     max: 1121 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 K325 +
min: 2188     avg: 2213     median: 2215 (3%)     max: 2233 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
K125 +
1737 Points (2%)
145%
K325 +
min: 2479     avg: 2523     median: 2518 (2%)     max: 2573 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
K125 +
1697 Points (10%)
min: 1262     avg: 1270     median: 1269 (8%)     max: 1278 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
K125 +
min: 2770     avg: 2887     median: 2890 (34%)     max: 3002 s
102%
K325 +
min: 1884     avg: 2784     median: 2784 (33%)     max: 3684 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
K125 +
min: 87     avg: 91.1     median: 90.7 (18%)     max: 95.5 s
101%
K325 +
min: 59     avg: 87.1     median: 87.1 (18%)     max: 115.1 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
K125 +
min: 730     avg: 741     median: 735 (2%)     max: 758 Points
141%
K325 +
min: 1027     avg: 1034     median: 1036 (2%)     max: 1039 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
K125 +
min: 46     avg: 47.3     median: 46 (10%)     max: 50 s
min: 56     avg: 57     median: 56 (12%)     max: 59 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
K125 +
min: 105     avg: 110.3     median: 109 (5%)     max: 117 s
min: 130     avg: 132.3     median: 132 (6%)     max: 135 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
K125 +
min: 2486     avg: 2530     median: 2539 (11%)     max: 2564 s
min: 2834     avg: 2986     median: 3026 (13%)     max: 3098 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
K125 +
min: 5740     avg: 6176     median: 6176 (3%)     max: 6612 MIPS
150%
K325 +
min: 9000     avg: 9278     median: 9250 (4%)     max: 9583 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
K125 +
min: 5250     avg: 5287     median: 5287 (4%)     max: 5324 MFLOPS
137%
K325 +
min: 7000     avg: 7173     median: 7253 (6%)     max: 7267 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 K125 +
min: 2236     avg: 2237     median: 2237 (14%)     max: 2238 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
K125 +
min: 3.6     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (47%)     max: 3.7 Points
105%
K325 +
min: 3.6     avg: 3.8     median: 3.9 (50%)     max: 3.9 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
K125 +
min: 1286     avg: 1300     median: 1300 (1%)     max: 1314 Points
157%
K325 +
min: 2039     avg: 2047     median: 2047 (2%)     max: 2055 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon II Neo K125 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon II Neo K325 → 117% n=14

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 01. 19:41:10

#0 checking url part for id 895 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 901 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.003s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.003s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 895 +0s ... 0.003s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#12 got single benchmarks 895 +0.01s ... 0.014s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 901 +0s ... 0.014s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#15 got single benchmarks 901 +0.008s ... 0.022s

#16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.023s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.024s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.031s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#89 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.033s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#91 return log +0.003s ... 0.036s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)