Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Texas Instruments OMAP 4460 vs Texas Instruments OMAP 4430

Texas Instruments OMAP 4460

► remove from comparison  OMAP 4460

Der Texas Instruments (TI) OMAP 4460 ist ein SoC (System on a Chip) für Handys und Tablet PCs. Er beinhaltet zwei ARM Cortex-A9 (ARM v7 Instruction Set) Rechenkernen mit 1.2-1.5 GHz und ARMs SIMD Engine NEON. Die integrierte PowerVR SGX540 Grafikkarte wird mit 384 MHz getaktet und kann wie die zwei Prozessorkerne auf den Dual Channel LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller (max 400MHz) zugreifen. Im Vergleich zum OMAP 4430, ist beim 4460 daher CPU und GPU Teil höher getaktet.

 

Texas Instruments OMAP 4430

► remove from comparison  OMAP 4430

Der Texas Instruments (TI) OMAP 4430 ist ein SoC (System on a Chip) für Handys und Tablet PCs. Er beinhaltet zwei ARM Cortex-A9 (ARM v7 Instruction Set) Rechenkernen mit 1-1.2 GHz und ARMs SIMD Engine NEON. Zusätzlich sind zwei Cortex M3 Kerne für Multimediafunktionen integriert. Die integrierte PowerVR SGX540 Grafikkarte wird mit 304 MHz getaktet und kann wie die zwei Prozessorkerne auf den Dual Channel LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller (max 400MHz) zugreifen.

Die Performance der Rechenkerne liegt auf dem Niveau eines Nvidia Tegra 2 SoCs. Bei der Flash Performance im GUIMark 2 und Linpack Benchmarks unter Android liegen sie in etwas auf einem Level. Im Architektruvergleich fehlt dem Tegra 2 jedoch die SIMD Engine und auch das Speicher Interface ist nur als Single Channel ausgelegt.

Die Grafikperformance ist oft vergleichbar, wobei es Einzeltests gibt (RightWare Basemark ES 2.0) wo sich der SGX 540 deutlich durchsetzen kann.

Der Stromverbrauch ist mit angegebenen 100uW - 600mW relativ gering und eignet sich daher auch für den Einsatz in Smartphones.

ModelTexas Instruments OMAP 4460Texas Instruments OMAP 4430
Series
CodenameCortex A9Cortex A9
Serie: Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4470 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
» Texas Instruments OMAP 44601.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Broadcom BCM28155 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 44301 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Apple A5x compare1 GHz2 Cortex A9
Apple A5 compare1 GHz2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4470 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 44601.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Broadcom BCM28155 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
» Texas Instruments OMAP 44301 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Apple A5x compare1 GHz2 Cortex A9
Apple A5 compare1 GHz2 Cortex A9
Clock1200 MHz1000 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP0.6 Watt0.6 Watt
Technology45 nm45 nm
FeaturesDual Channel LPDDR 400MHz Memory Controller, IVA 3 Multimedia Accelerator, PowerVR SGX 540 Graphics Core, Image Signal ProcessorDual Channel LPDDR 400MHz Memory Controller, IVA 3 Multimedia Accelerator, PowerVR SGX 540 Graphics Core, Image Signal Processor
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturer OMAP 4430

Benchmarks

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 418     avg: 426     median: 426 (3%)     max: 434 Points
191 Points (2%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 1123     avg: 1207     median: 1206.5 (11%)     max: 1290 Points
923 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 1573     avg: 1730     median: 1730 (3%)     max: 1887 Points
183 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 917     avg: 1013     median: 1013 (2%)     max: 1109 Points
449 Points (1%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 1137     avg: 1244     median: 1243.5 (3%)     max: 1350 Points
424 Points (1%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
796 Points (1%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
427 Points (9%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 73.8     avg: 75.2     median: 75.2 (3%)     max: 76.6 MFLOPS
min: 38.78     avg: 59.5     median: 63.7 (2%)     max: 71.9 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 44.38     avg: 48.6     median: 48.6 (5%)     max: 52.9 MFLOPS
min: 36.48     avg: 40.8     median: 40.6 (4%)     max: 45.39 MFLOPS
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1096 ms (12%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1102     avg: 1445     median: 1444.5 (14%)     max: 1787 ms
min: 1761     avg: 1955     median: 1895.5 (18%)     max: 2269 ms
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 2226     avg: 2586     median: 2585.5 (6%)     max: 2945 points
min: 2475     avg: 2571     median: 2571 (6%)     max: 2666 points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
12347 Points (29%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
224 Iter./s (7%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
5481 Iter./s (18%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
5787 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks Texas Instruments OMAP 4460 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Texas Instruments OMAP 4430 → 64% n=9

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 25. 05:54:41

#0 checking url part for id 3601 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3004 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 23 May 2022 13:12:29 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.056s ... 0.06s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.062s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#12 composed specs +0s ... 0.062s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.062s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 3601 +0s ... 0.063s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.064s

#17 got single benchmarks 3601 +0.006s ... 0.07s

#18 getting avg benchmarks for device 3004 +0s ... 0.07s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#20 got single benchmarks 3004 +0.008s ... 0.078s

#21 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.078s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.079s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#61 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.086s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#63 return log +0.004s ... 0.089s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)