Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Texas Instruments OMAP 4470 vs Broadcom BCM28155

Texas Instruments OMAP 4470

► remove from comparison  OMAP 4470

Der Texas Instruments (TI) OMAP 4470 ist ein SoC (System on a Chip) für Handys und Tablet PCs. Er beinhaltet zwei ARM Cortex-A9 (ARM v7 Instruction Set) Rechenkernen mit 1.3-1.8 GHz und ARMs SIMD Engine NEON. Zusätzlich sind zwei ARM Cortex-M3 Kerne  Die integrierte PowerVR SGX540 Grafikkarte wird mit 277-384 MHz getaktet und kann wie die zwei Prozessorkerne auf den Dual Channel LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller (max 400MHz) zugreifen. Weiters ist eine Vivante CGPU für 2D Aufgaben verbaut. Im Vergleich zum OMAP 4430, ist beim 4460 daher CPU und GPU Teil höher getaktet.

Broadcom BCM28155

► remove from comparison Broadcom BCM28155

Der Broadcom BCM28155 ist ein Dual-Core Cortex-A9 SoC mit einer VideoCore-IV Grafikkarte. Mit 1.2 GHz Taktrate findet man den BCM28155 z.B. im Galaxy S II Plus. Das integrierte Modem unterstützt UMTS und HSPA+, jedoch kein LTE.

ModelTexas Instruments OMAP 4470Broadcom BCM28155
Series Broadcom
CodenameCortex A9Cortex A9
Serie: Cortex A9
» Texas Instruments OMAP 44701.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4460 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Broadcom BCM281551.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4430 compare1 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Apple A5x compare1 GHz2 Cortex A9
Apple A5 compare1 GHz2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 44701.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4460 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
» Broadcom BCM281551.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4430 compare1 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Apple A5x compare1 GHz2 Cortex A9
Apple A5 compare1 GHz2 Cortex A9
Clock1500 MHz1200 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
Technology45 nm40 nm
FeaturesDual Channel LPDDR 400MHz Memory Controller, IVA 3 Multimedia Accelerator, PowerVR SGX 540 Graphics Core, Image Signal ProcessorDual Channel LPDDR2 400MHz Memory Controller, VideoCore-IV GPU
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
ManufacturerBroadcom BCM28155

Benchmarks

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 436     avg: 438     median: 438 (4%)     max: 440 Points
min: 149     avg: 240.5     median: 240.5 (2%)     max: 332 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 1302     avg: 1326     median: 1325.5 (12%)     max: 1349 Points
min: 731     avg: 738     median: 737.5 (7%)     max: 744 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 1895     avg: 1929     median: 1929 (4%)     max: 1963 Points
min: 555     avg: 930     median: 930 (2%)     max: 1305 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 1118     avg: 1136     median: 1135.5 (2%)     max: 1153 Points
min: 324     avg: 533     median: 533 (1%)     max: 742 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 1367     avg: 1381     median: 1381 (4%)     max: 1395 Points
min: 468     avg: 679     median: 679 (2%)     max: 890 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 80.5     avg: 87.6     median: 87.6 (3%)     max: 94.6 MFLOPS
min: 24.39     avg: 52     median: 52 (2%)     max: 79.7 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 52.5     avg: 55.4     median: 55.4 (5%)     max: 58.3 MFLOPS
min: 26.08     avg: 36.2     median: 36.2 (4%)     max: 46.3 MFLOPS
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1438     avg: 1497     median: 1497 (14%)     max: 1556 ms
min: 1434     avg: 1701     median: 1701 (16%)     max: 1968 ms
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 2747     avg: 3447     median: 3447 (8%)     max: 4147 points
3909 points (9%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
min: 1169     avg: 1255     median: 1255 (8%)     max: 1341 Points

Average Benchmarks Texas Instruments OMAP 4470 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Broadcom BCM28155 → 66% n=9

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 29. 07:24:46

#0 checking url part for id 3647 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3771 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 28 May 2022 13:12:34 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.037s ... 0.041s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.044s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#12 composed specs +0s ... 0.044s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.044s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 3647 +0s ... 0.044s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.046s

#17 got single benchmarks 3647 +0.006s ... 0.051s

#18 getting avg benchmarks for device 3771 +0s ... 0.051s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#20 got single benchmarks 3771 +0.006s ... 0.057s

#21 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.057s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.058s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#56 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.063s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#58 return log +0.004s ... 0.067s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)