Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Texas Instruments OMAP 4470 vs Texas Instruments OMAP 4430

Texas Instruments OMAP 4470

► remove from comparison  OMAP 4470

Der Texas Instruments (TI) OMAP 4470 ist ein SoC (System on a Chip) für Handys und Tablet PCs. Er beinhaltet zwei ARM Cortex-A9 (ARM v7 Instruction Set) Rechenkernen mit 1.3-1.8 GHz und ARMs SIMD Engine NEON. Zusätzlich sind zwei ARM Cortex-M3 Kerne  Die integrierte PowerVR SGX540 Grafikkarte wird mit 277-384 MHz getaktet und kann wie die zwei Prozessorkerne auf den Dual Channel LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller (max 400MHz) zugreifen. Weiters ist eine Vivante CGPU für 2D Aufgaben verbaut. Im Vergleich zum OMAP 4430, ist beim 4460 daher CPU und GPU Teil höher getaktet.

Texas Instruments OMAP 4430

► remove from comparison  OMAP 4430

Der Texas Instruments (TI) OMAP 4430 ist ein SoC (System on a Chip) für Handys und Tablet PCs. Er beinhaltet zwei ARM Cortex-A9 (ARM v7 Instruction Set) Rechenkernen mit 1-1.2 GHz und ARMs SIMD Engine NEON. Zusätzlich sind zwei Cortex M3 Kerne für Multimediafunktionen integriert. Die integrierte PowerVR SGX540 Grafikkarte wird mit 304 MHz getaktet und kann wie die zwei Prozessorkerne auf den Dual Channel LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller (max 400MHz) zugreifen.

Die Performance der Rechenkerne liegt auf dem Niveau eines Nvidia Tegra 2 SoCs. Bei der Flash Performance im GUIMark 2 und Linpack Benchmarks unter Android liegen sie in etwas auf einem Level. Im Architektruvergleich fehlt dem Tegra 2 jedoch die SIMD Engine und auch das Speicher Interface ist nur als Single Channel ausgelegt.

Die Grafikperformance ist oft vergleichbar, wobei es Einzeltests gibt (RightWare Basemark ES 2.0) wo sich der SGX 540 deutlich durchsetzen kann.

Der Stromverbrauch ist mit angegebenen 100uW - 600mW relativ gering und eignet sich daher auch für den Einsatz in Smartphones.

ModelTexas Instruments OMAP 4470Texas Instruments OMAP 4430
Series
CodenameCortex A9Cortex A9
Serie: Cortex A9
» Texas Instruments OMAP 44701.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4460 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Broadcom BCM28155 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 44301 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Apple A5x compare1 GHz2 Cortex A9
Apple A5 compare1 GHz2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 44701.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4460 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Broadcom BCM28155 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
» Texas Instruments OMAP 44301 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Apple A5x compare1 GHz2 Cortex A9
Apple A5 compare1 GHz2 Cortex A9
Clock1500 MHz1000 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
Technology45 nm45 nm
FeaturesDual Channel LPDDR 400MHz Memory Controller, IVA 3 Multimedia Accelerator, PowerVR SGX 540 Graphics Core, Image Signal ProcessorDual Channel LPDDR 400MHz Memory Controller, IVA 3 Multimedia Accelerator, PowerVR SGX 540 Graphics Core, Image Signal Processor
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
TDP0.6 Watt
Manufacturer OMAP 4430

Benchmarks

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 436     avg: 438     median: 438 (4%)     max: 440 Points
191 Points (2%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 1302     avg: 1326     median: 1325.5 (12%)     max: 1349 Points
923 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 1895     avg: 1929     median: 1929 (4%)     max: 1963 Points
183 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 1118     avg: 1136     median: 1135.5 (2%)     max: 1153 Points
449 Points (1%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 1367     avg: 1381     median: 1381 (4%)     max: 1395 Points
424 Points (1%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 80.5     avg: 87.6     median: 87.6 (3%)     max: 94.6 MFLOPS
min: 38.78     avg: 59.5     median: 63.7 (2%)     max: 71.9 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 52.5     avg: 55.4     median: 55.4 (5%)     max: 58.3 MFLOPS
min: 36.48     avg: 40.8     median: 40.6 (4%)     max: 45.39 MFLOPS
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1438     avg: 1497     median: 1497 (14%)     max: 1556 ms
min: 1761     avg: 1955     median: 1895.5 (18%)     max: 2269 ms
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 2747     avg: 3447     median: 3447 (8%)     max: 4147 points
min: 2475     avg: 2571     median: 2571 (6%)     max: 2666 points

Average Benchmarks Texas Instruments OMAP 4470 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Texas Instruments OMAP 4430 → 57% n=9

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 24. 21:23:34

#0 checking url part for id 3647 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3004 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 23 May 2022 13:12:29 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.055s ... 0.059s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.062s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#12 composed specs +0s ... 0.062s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.062s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 3647 +0s ... 0.062s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.064s

#17 got single benchmarks 3647 +0.006s ... 0.07s

#18 getting avg benchmarks for device 3004 +0s ... 0.07s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#20 got single benchmarks 3004 +0.008s ... 0.079s

#21 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.079s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.08s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.081s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.081s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.083s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#55 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.084s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.035s ... 0.119s

#57 return log +0.004s ... 0.123s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)