ERROR: No GPU found with the ID:4850

getGPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German GPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected)

ERROR: No GPU found with the ID:9963

getGPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German GPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) Vivante GC800 vs
Notebookcheck Logo

Vivante GC800 vs

Vivante GC800

► remove from comparison

Die Vivante GC800 ist ein Grafikkern für ARM (Rockchip RK291x) und MIPS (Actions ATM701x) SoCs. Sie bietet einen VEC-4 (bzw 4 VEC-1) unified Shader und unterstützt OpenGL ES 2.0 (optional ES 3.0), OpenGL 2.0, OpenVG 1.1, DirectX 9_3 (optional) und OpenCL 1.2 (optional). Die Taktrate kann von 315 und 575 MHz (40nm Prozess) bis zu 800 MHz (28nm Prozess) betragen. 

  • Single Core Unified Shader (32-bit SIMD Vec4)
  • Geometry 35 M / Tri/s
  • Texture Pixel Rate 325 M Pix/s
  • 6 GFLOPS Processing
  • Syntehsis Area 1.2 mm2
  • Silicon 2.5 mm2
  • Adobe Flash / Air Acceleration
  • vivantecorp.com/Product_Brief.pdf

GC800

40nm LP

40nm G+

Synthesis Gate Count (ND2D1 gates) 

2.04 M

2.0 M

Memory Bits

65.3 KB

64 KB

Synthesis Area (std. cells + memory) 

1.74 mm2

1.89 mm2

Silicon Area 

2.31 mm2

2.5 mm2

Clock Frequency in Silicon

315 MHz

575 MHz

Active Power 

64.85 mW

54 mW

Geometry Rate

31.5 M tri/s

57 M tri/s

Pixel Rate, Depth-only

315 M pix/s

575 M pix/s

Pixel Rate, Textured

315 M pix/s

575 M pix/s

Vertex Rate

157.5 M vert/s

287 M vert/s

Vivante GC800
Serie
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core 2 @ 0.6 GHz
GC800 1 @ 0.32 - 0.58 GHz
Extreme Graphics 2 @ 0.13 GHz
PXP
unknown
Shared Memoryja
Pipelines1 - unified
Kerntakt315 - 575 (Boost) MHz
APIOpenGL ES 2.0
Herstellungsprozess28 nm
Erscheinungsdatum01.01.2012
Herstellerseitewww.vivantecorp.com
CPU in GC800GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Rockchip RK29181 x 1000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 x 1000 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
100%
1 GC800 +
1899 Points (66%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
100%
1 GC800 +
3546 Points (31%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
100%
1 GC800 +
4199 Points (44%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
100%
1 GC800 +
29.1 fps (48%)
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
100%
1 GC800 +
59.8 fps (89%)
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
100%
1 GC800 +
min: 1254     avg: 1911     median: 1259 (27%)     max: 3219 Points

Average Benchmarks Vivante GC800 → 0% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

v1.26
log 13. 06:15:53

#0 checking url part for id 4850 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3156 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9963 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 May 2024 05:40:51 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.099s ... 0.1s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.1s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.1s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4850 +0.036s ... 0.137s

#9 got single benchmarks 4850 +0s ... 0.137s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 3156 +0.002s ... 0.139s

#11 got single benchmarks 3156 +0.01s ... 0.149s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9963 +0.002s ... 0.151s

#13 got single benchmarks 9963 +0.006s ... 0.156s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.156s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.166s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.166s

#17 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.168s

#18 return log +0.003s ... 0.171s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)