Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 1017U vs Intel Celeron 1047UE

Intel Celeron 1017U

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Celeron 1017U ist ein sparsamer Doppelkernprozessor aus dem Einstiegssegment. Er taktet mit 1,6 GHz und basiert auf der Ivy Bridge Architektur. Im Vergleich zu den Core-i3-, i5- und i7-Prozessoren sind jedoch die meisten Features deaktiviert (Turbo Boost, AES, HyperThreading). Die integrierte Grafikkarte basiert auf der HD Graphics 2500, wird jedoch von Intel nur HD Graphics genannt und mit 350 bzw. 1000 MHz (Turbo Boost) getaktet. Ausserdem ist ein DDR3-1600-Speicherkontroller in dem Prozessor integriert.

Die Performance liegt dank der verbesserten Architektur etwas oberhalb einer ähnlich getakteten Sandy-Bridge-CPU und etwa auf dem Level eines Intel Celeron B820.

Die Ivy Bridge Prozessoren beinhalten in der angegebenen TDP auch die Grafikkarte und den Speicherkontroller. Mit 17 Watt TDP eignet sich der Prozessor für kleine Notebooks und Subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 1047UE

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Celeron 1047UE ist ein Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) Einstiegs Doppelkernprozessor für eingebettete Systeme. Er bietet zwei Kerne und basiert auf der Ivy Bridge Architektur. Im Vergleich zu den Core i3, i5 und i7 Doppelkernprozessoren, sind jedoch die meisten Features deaktiviert (Turbo Boost, AES, HyperThreading). Die integrierte Grafikkarte basiert auf der HD Graphics 2500, wird jedoch von Intel nur HD Graphics genannt und mit 350 bzw. 900 MHz (Turbo Boost) getaktet. Ausserdem ist ein DDR3-Speicherkontroller in dem Prozessor integriert.

Die Performance liegt dank der verbesserten Architektur etwas oberhalb einer ähnlich getakteten Sandy-Bridge-CPU und somit knapp über dem Level eines Intel Pentium 987.

Die Ivy Bridge Doppelkernprozessoren beinhalten in der angegebenen TDP auch die Grafikkarte und den Speicherkontroller. Mit 17 Watt TDP eignet sich der Prozessor auch für sehr kleine Geräte.

ModelIntel Celeron 1017UIntel Celeron 1047UE
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameIvy BridgeIvy Bridge
Serie: Celeron Ivy Bridge
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1017U1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE compare1.5 GHz1 / 11 MB
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1047UE1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE compare1.5 GHz1 / 11 MB
Clock1600 MHz1400 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt17 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
Die Size94 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1023BGA
FeaturesHD Graphics (350 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics (350 - 900 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron 1017UIntel Celeron 1047UE
$134 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 1017U +
1.3 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 1017U +
0.6 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 1017U +
2201 Points (20%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 1017U +
4155 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 1017U +
5280 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 1017U +
2797 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 1017U +
1449 s (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 1017U +
46.4 s (9%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 1017U +
1150 Points (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 1017U +
7.6 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 1017U +
41.9 fps (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 1017U +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 1017U +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 1017U +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 1017U +
1719 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 1017U +
24.3 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 1017U +
53.5 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 1017U +
1219 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 1017U +
19720 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 1017U +
11800 MFLOPS (9%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 1017U +
4130 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 1017U +
1532 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 1017U +
11797 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 1017U +
1041 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 1017U +
2308 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 1017U +
1367 Points (27%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 1017U +
3985 Points (32%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 1017U +
3500 Points (32%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 1017U +
2631 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 1017U +
2494 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 1017U +
2892 Points (8%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 1017U → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 29. 02:39:28

#0 checking url part for id 3947 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3596 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 25 Sep 2022 13:14:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.003s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 3947 +0s ... 0.007s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#22 got single benchmarks 3947 +0.007s ... 0.014s

#23 getting avg benchmarks for device 3596 +0s ... 0.015s

#24 got single benchmarks 3596 +0s ... 0.015s

#25 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.015s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.015s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.02s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.02s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.02s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#56 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.025s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#58 return log +0.004s ... 0.029s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)