Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron M 520 vs Intel Celeron M 585

Intel Celeron M 520

► remove from comparison

Basierend auf den Merom kern mit 64 KB L1 Cache (32 KB Daten + 32 KB Instruktionen) und 1024 KB L2 Cache, der mit vollem Prozessortakt läuft.

Verbaut auf Sockel 479, AGTL+ mit 133 MHz (quadpumped 533 MHz)

Intel Celeron M 585

Der Intel Celeron M 585 ist ein Einkernprozessor für billige Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern, jedoch mit nur einem aktivierten Rechenkern (sozusagen ein T3400 mit nur einem Kern). Er wurde jedoch funktionsmäßig stark abgespeckt und bietet z.B. auch weniger Stromsparfunktionen (kein Speedstep).

ModelIntel Celeron M 520Intel Celeron M 585
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
CodenameMeromMerom
Serie: Celeron M Merom
Intel Celeron M 570 compare2.26 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 560 compare2.13 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 575 compare2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 550 compare2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 540 compare1.86 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 530 compare1.73 GHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 570 compare2.26 GHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 560 compare2.13 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 575 compare2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 550 compare2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 540 compare1.86 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 530 compare1.73 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1
Clock1600 MHz2160 MHz
FSB533667
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 1
TDP30 Watt31 Watt
65 nm65 nm, 0.95-1.30V
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, XD-BitEM64T, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron M 520Intel Celeron M 585
Transistors291 Million
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketPPGA478
$70 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 585 +
2062 Points (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 585 +
2062 Points (3%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
100%
1 520 +
3639 s (14%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
100%
1 520 +
112 s (59%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
520 +
min: 39     avg: 39.2     median: 39.2 (8%)     max: 39.3 s
102%
585 +
31.4 s (7%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 520 +
2015 s (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 520 +
7400 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 520 +
5078 MFLOPS (4%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 520 +
min: 1845     avg: 1942     median: 1942 (12%)     max: 2039 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 520 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 585 → 102% n=1

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 06. 16:12:55

#0 checking url part for id 321 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 429 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:14:23 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.002s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.002s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.002s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.003s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#17 composed specs +0s ... 0.003s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 321 +0s ... 0.004s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#21 got single benchmarks 321 +0.01s ... 0.014s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 429 +0s ... 0.014s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#24 got single benchmarks 429 +0.006s ... 0.021s

#25 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#37 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.024s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#39 return log +0.004s ... 0.028s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)