Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron B800 vs Intel Celeron B840

Intel Celeron B800

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Celeron B800 ist ein Doppelkern Notebookprozessor für Einsteigergeräte. Er ist mit 1.5 GHz relativ gering getaktet und dürfte eine Performance eines 2 GHz Core 2 Duo (z.B. Core 2 Duo T5600).

Er bietet eine integrierte Intel HD Graphics (650-1000MHz) Grafikkarte. Auf Features wie Turbo Boost, Hyperthreading, AES und Virtualization VT-d muss der Celeron verzichten. Auch einige Stromsparfunktionen könnten deaktiviert sein, worduch die Akkulaufzeit im Vergleich zu Core i3 Prozessoren leidet. Intel Insider, Quick Sync und Wireless Display wird ebenfalls nicht unterstützt.

Der integrierte DDR3-1066/1333 Dual-Channel Speichercontroller unterstützt bis zu 16 GB.

Intel Celeron B840

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Celeron B840 ist ein Doppelkern Notebookprozessor für Einsteigergeräte. Er ist mit 1.9 GHz getaktet und dürfte eine Performance eines 2.0 Celeron der Arrandale Famile erreichen.

Er bietet eine integrierte Intel HD Graphics (650-950MHz) Grafikkarte. Auf Features wie Turbo Boost, Hyperthreading, AES und Virtualization VT-d muss der Celeron verzichten. Auch einige Stromsparfunktionen könnten deaktiviert sein, worduch die Akkulaufzeit im Vergleich zu Core i3 Prozessoren leidet. Intel Insider, Quick Sync und Wireless Display wird ebenfalls nicht unterstützt.

Der integrierte DDR3-1066/1333 Dual-Channel Speichercontroller unterstützt bis zu 8 GB.

ModelIntel Celeron B800Intel Celeron B840
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameSandy BridgeSandy Bridge
Serie: Celeron Sandy Bridge
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B830 compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B820 compare1.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B815 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B810 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 887 compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 877 compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 867 compare1.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B730 compare1.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 847 compare1.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 807 compare1.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B720 compare1.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B710 compare1.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 797 compare1.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
» Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B830 compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B820 compare1.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B815 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B810 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 887 compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 877 compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 867 compare1.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B730 compare1.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 847 compare1.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 807 compare1.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B720 compare1.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B710 compare1.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 797 compare1.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Clock1500 MHz1900 MHz
L2 Cache512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Technology32 nm32 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPGA988rPGA988B
FeaturesIdle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitIdle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 950 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$80 U.S.$86 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron B800Intel Celeron B840

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 B800 +
1910 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 B800 +
3779 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 B800 +
1508 s (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 B800 +
47 s (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 B800 +
1534 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 B800 +
26.1 s (6%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 B800 +
5.1 Points (65%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron B800 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 16. 18:27:59

#0 checking url part for id 2726 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2859 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:13:41 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.003s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#24 getting avg benchmarks for device 2726 +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#26 got single benchmarks 2726 +0.007s ... 0.013s

#27 getting avg benchmarks for device 2859 +0s ... 0.013s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#29 got single benchmarks 2859 +0.005s ... 0.019s

#30 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.02s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.02s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.02s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#38 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.021s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#40 return log +0.004s ... 0.026s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)