Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Celeron B815 vs Intel Celeron B710

Intel Celeron B815

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Celeron B815 ist ein Doppelkern Notebookprozessor für Einsteigergeräte. Er ist mit 1.6 GHz relativ gering getaktet und dürfte eine Performance eines 1.7-2.0 Celeron der Arrandale Famile erreichen (z.b. P4500). 

Im Vergleich zum Celeron B810, soll der B815 eine schnellere Grafikeinheit bieten (650-1050). Die verbaute Intel HD Graphics Grafikkarte (und keine HD Graphics 3000) ist jedoch deutlich langsamer als die Prozessorgrafik in Core i3 CPUs. Auf Features wie Turbo Boost, Hyperthreading, AES und Virtualization VT-d muss der Celeron verzichten. Auch einige Stromsparfunktionen könnten deaktiviert sein, worduch die Akkulaufzeit im Vergleich zu Core i3 Prozessoren leidet. Intel Insider, Quick Sync und Wireless Display wird ebenfalls nicht unterstützt.

Der integrierte DDR3-1066/1333 Dual-Channel Speichercontroller unterstützt bis zu 16 GB.

Intel Celeron B710

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Celeron B710 ist ein Einzelkern Notebookprozessor für Einsteigergeräte. Er ist mit 1.6 GHz relativ gering getaktet und dürfte eine Performance eines Celeron M 570 mit 2.26 GHz erreichen. 

Er bietet eine integrierte Intel HD Graphics (650-1000MHz) Grafikkarte welche auf die HD Graphics 2000 basiert. Auf Features wie Turbo Boost, Hyperthreading, AES und Virtualization VT-d muss der Celeron verzichten. Auch einige Stromsparfunktionen könnten deaktiviert sein, worduch die Akkulaufzeit im Vergleich zu Core i3 Prozessoren leidet. Intel Insider, Quick Sync und Wireless Display wird ebenfalls nicht unterstützt.

Der integrierte DDR3-1066/1333 Dual-Channel Speichercontroller unterstützt bis zu 16 GB.

ModelIntel Celeron B815Intel Celeron B710
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameSandy BridgeSandy Bridge
Serie: Celeron Sandy Bridge
Intel Celeron B840 compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B830 compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B820 compare1.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B810 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 887 compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B800 compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 877 compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 867 compare1.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B730 compare1.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 847 compare1.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 807 compare1.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B720 compare1.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 797 compare1.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B840 compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B830 compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B820 compare1.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B810 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 887 compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B800 compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 877 compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 867 compare1.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B730 compare1.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 847 compare1.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 807 compare1.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B720 compare1.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
» Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 797 compare1.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Clock1600 MHz1600 MHz
L3 Cache2 MB1.5 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 21 / 1
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
32 nm32 nm0.871-1.091
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPGA988PGA988
FeaturesIdle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitIdle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1050 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron B815Intel Celeron B710
L1 Cache64 KB
L2 Cache256 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 B710 +
0.6 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
B815 +
2093 Points (19%)
2051 Points (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 B815 +
4029 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 B710 +
2574 Points (16%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
B815 +
1412 s (17%)
2825 s (33%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
B815 +
44.3 s (9%)
88.4 s (18%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 B710 +
631 Points (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 B710 +
3.5 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 B710 +
20.3 fps (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 B710 +
0 GB/s (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 B710 +
0 GB/s (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 B710 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
B815 +
1645 Points (4%)
868 Points (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
B815 +
24.9 s (5%)
100%
B710 +
25.1 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
B815 +
55.9 s (2%)
100%
B710 +
56.8 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 B710 +
1259 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
B815 +
24000 MIPS (11%)
11230 MIPS (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
B815 +
11480 MFLOPS (9%)
5370 MFLOPS (4%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 B815 +
5.3 Points (68%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 B710 +
1962 Points (2%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron B815 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron B710 → 77% n=8

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 22. 15:57:48

#0 checking url part for id 2994 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2835 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 18 May 2022 13:12:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.003s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.005s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#24 getting avg benchmarks for device 2994 +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.007s

#27 got single benchmarks 2994 +0.006s ... 0.013s

#28 getting avg benchmarks for device 2835 +0s ... 0.013s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#30 got single benchmarks 2835 +0.005s ... 0.018s

#31 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.019s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.02s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.02s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.02s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.023s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#59 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.028s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.028s ... 0.056s

#61 return log +0.004s ... 0.059s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)