Notebookcheck Logo

MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300

MediaTek Dimensity 1100

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 1100

Der Dimensity 1100 (MT6891) ist ein Mid-Range-Prozessor für Smartphones mit integriertem 5G Modem. Der CPU-Teil integriert vier schnelle ARM Cortex-A78 Kerne mit bis zu 2,6 GHz und vier Stromsparkerne vom Typ Cortex-A55 mit bis zu 2 GHz. Die integrierte Grafikkarte ist eine ARM Mali-G77 MC9 / MP9. Als einer der ersten SoCs unterstützt die Dimensity 1000 Serie AV1 Hardware Decoding. Die integrierte APU 3.0 integriert laut Mediatek sechs AI Prozessoren.

MediaTek Dimensity 1300

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 1300

Der Dimensity 1300 ist ein Oberklasse-Prozessor für Smartphones mit integriertem 5G Modem. Der CPU-Teil besteht aus drei Clustern: Einem schnellen Performance-Kern, basierend auf der ARM-Cortex-A78-Architektur und getaktet mit bis zu 3 GHz. Der zweite Cluster besteht aus drei Cortex-A78-Kernen mit bis zu 2,6 GHz. Als Stromspar-Cluster sind vier ARM Cortex-A55 Kerne mit bis zu 2 GHz verbaut.

Diese Architektur entspricht exakt der des MediaTek Dimensity 1200. Auch ansonsten gibt es keine Unterschiede in der Ausstattung zwischen beiden Chips.

So unterstützt der Dimensity 1300 Dual-SIM-5G (5G SA & NSA, max 4.7 Gbps Download und 2.5 Gbps Upload). Zudem integriert das SoC AV1 Hardware Decoding und eine 6-Kern APU (3.0). Die integrierte Grafikkarte ist vom Typ ARM Mali-G77 MC9 mit 9 Clustern. WLAN wird im Standard WiFi 6 unterstützt (ax), ebenso ist Bluetooth 5.2 an Bord. 

Einziger Unterschied zum Dimensity 1200 ist die Unterstützung für die HyperEngine 5.0. Diese soll das Gaming-Erlebnis durch schnellere Reaktionen und bessere Bildqualität verbessern.

Der Chip wird im 6nm-Verfahren gefertigt.

ModelMediaTek Dimensity 1100MediaTek Dimensity 1300
SeriesMediatek Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A78 / A55Cortex-A78 / A55
Serie: Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 13002 - 3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 compare2 - 3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 compare2 - 3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A78 / A55
» MediaTek Dimensity 11002 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 920 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 900 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A78 / A55
» MediaTek Dimensity 13002 - 3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 compare2 - 3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 compare2 - 3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 11002 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 920 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A78 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 900 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A78 / A55
Clock2000 - 2600 MHz2000 - 3000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology7 nm6 nm
Features4x A77 (2.6 GHz), 4x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), ARM Mali-G77 MC9, APU 3.0, 5G Modem, MiraVision (4K HDR Video, 80MP Photo), Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.2, UFS 3.1, 16GB-4266 LPDDR4x Support1x ARM Cortex-A78 (3 GHz), 3x A78 (2.6 GHz), 4x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), ARM Mali-G75 MC5, APU 3.0, 5G Modem, MiraVision (4K HDR Video, 80MP Photo), Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.2, UFS 3.1, 16GB-4266 LPDDR4x Support
iGPUARM Mali-G77 MP9ARM Mali-G77 MP9
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
ManufacturerMediatek Dimensity 1100Mediatek Dimensity 1300

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
655 Points (32%)
415 Points (20%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2500 Points (9%)
2700 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2579 Points (40%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11791 Points (29%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
9428 Points (15%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2055 Points (34%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
1912 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2523 Points (23%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
16061 Points (31%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
7809 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
9050 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1406 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
33879 Points (35%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
65 Points (17%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
7485 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
10678 Points (58%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
4206 Points (22%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
29020 Points (62%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
9101 Points (59%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.4 Power Consumption 150cd *
3.5 Watt (15%)
012345678910Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd *
1.4 Watt (5%)
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.911.11.21.31.41.51.61.71.81.92Tooltip

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 1100 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 1300 → 86% n=2

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 16. 14:22:52

#0 checking url part for id 13242 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14519 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:13:41 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.05s ... 0.055s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.057s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#13 composed specs +0s ... 0.057s

#14 did output specs +0s ... 0.057s

#15 getting avg benchmarks for device 13242 +0s ... 0.058s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.058s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#18 got single benchmarks 13242 +0.008s ... 0.067s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 14519 +0s ... 0.067s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.068s

#21 got single benchmarks 14519 +0.009s ... 0.077s

#22 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.077s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.078s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.083s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.084s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.085s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.086s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.087s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.088s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.011s ... 0.099s

#45 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.101s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#47 return log +0.004s ... 0.106s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)