Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380

Intel Core 2 Duo P7370

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Dank 25 Watt TDP, eignet sich der Notebook Prozessor auch für 13" Notebooks. Im Vergleich zu stärkeren Penryn Core 2 Duo, bietet der P7450 wahrscheinlich keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen und keine Unterstützung für Trusted Execution Technology. 

Für Multimediaanwendungen und anspruchslose Spiele, sollte die Performance des Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380

► remove from comparison

Der Core 2 Duo SL9380 ist ein stromsparender Low Voltage Prozessor für dünne und leichte Notebooks. Er bietet den vollen 6MB Level 2 Cache des Penryn Kerns und bietet dadurch eine bessere Performance als andere 1.8 GHz Core 2 Duo Prozessoren mit weniger Cache (1-3MB üblich). Im Vergleich zum SL9400 bietet der SL9400 einen langsameren FSB mit 800 MHz (statt 1066) und genau 1.8 GHz (Multiplikator 9).

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P7370Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz1800 MHz
FSB1066800
L2 Cache3 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt17 Watt
Technology45 nm45 nm
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Transistors410 Million
Die Size107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA956
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, Intel VT, TXT
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SL9380

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 P7370 +
2191 Points (20%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 P7370 +
4022 Points (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 P7370 +
min: 1705     avg: 1712     median: 1711.5 (4%)     max: 1718 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 P7370 +
25.2 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 P7370 +
60.3 s (3%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 P7370 +
17081 MIPS (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 P7370 +
14679 MFLOPS (11%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 P7370 +
3060 Points (19%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 P7370 +
4.9 Points (70%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 03. 19:52:47

#0 checking url part for id 455 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 497 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.007s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 455 +0s ... 0.008s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#48 got single benchmarks 455 +0.006s ... 0.014s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 497 +0s ... 0.015s

#50 got single benchmarks 497 +0s ... 0.015s

#51 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.015s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.015s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.015s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.015s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.016s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.016s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.016s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.017s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.017s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#61 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.018s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.024s ... 0.042s

#63 return log +0.004s ... 0.046s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)