Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 ist ein langsam getakteter Doppelkernprozessor für Einsteiger-Notebooks. Er basiert auf den alten Merom Kern, bietet jedoch im Vergleich zu den Core 2 Duo Prozessoren deutlich weniger Features (weniger Stromsparmechanismen, keine Hardware Virtualisierung, ...). Laut Intel unterstützt die CPU kein Speedstep, jedoch sind Versionen im Handel mit Speedstep gesichtet worden.

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600 ist ein langsam getakteter Doppelkernprozessor für Einsteiger-Notebooks. Er basiert auf den alten Merom Kern, bietet jedoch im Vergleich zu den Core 2 Duo Prozessoren deutlich weniger Features (weniger Stromsparmechanismen, keine Hardware Virtualisierung, ...). Laut Intel unterstützt die CPU kein Speedstep, jedoch sind Versionen im Handel mit Speedstep gesichtet worden.

ModelIntel Celeron Dual-Core T1500Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreIntel Celeron Dual-Core
CodenameMeromMerom
Serie: Celeron Dual-Core Merom
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T16001.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T15001.87 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T16001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T15001.87 GHz2 / 2
Clock1866 MHz1660 MHz
FSB533667
L2 Cache512 KB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
65 nm1.075-1.175V65 nm1.075V-1.175V
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
FeaturesIntel 64, eXIntel 64, eX
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million
Die Size143 mm2
SocketPPGA478
ManufacturerIntel Celeron Dual-Core T1600

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T1500 +
1625 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2960 Points (4%)
3000 Points (4%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1400 Points (3%)
1350 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
39 s (8%)
36 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T1500 +
91 s (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
15900 MIPS (8%)
14100 MIPS (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
12000 MFLOPS (9%)
10600 MFLOPS (8%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600 → 95% n=5

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 05. 14:15:05

#0 checking url part for id 428 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 479 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#9 composed specs +0s ... 0.003s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 428 +0s ... 0.003s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#13 got single benchmarks 428 +0.005s ... 0.009s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 479 +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#16 got single benchmarks 479 +0.008s ... 0.017s

#17 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.017s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.018s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.018s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.02s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.02s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.02s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#30 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.022s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#32 return log +0.004s ... 0.026s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)