Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600

Der Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600 ist ein langsam getakteter Doppelkernprozessor für Einsteiger-Notebooks. Er basiert auf den alten Merom Kern, bietet jedoch im Vergleich zu den Core 2 Duo Prozessoren deutlich weniger Features (weniger Stromsparmechanismen, keine Hardware Virtualisierung, ...). Laut Intel unterstützt die CPU kein Speedstep, jedoch sind Versionen im Handel mit Speedstep gesichtet worden.

SerieIntel Celeron Dual-Core
CodenameMerom
Serie: Celeron Dual-Core Merom
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T16001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 compare1.87 GHz2 / 2
Taktung1660 MHz
Front Side Bus667
Level 2 Cache1 MB
Anzahl von Kernen / Threads2 / 2
Stromverbrauch (TDP = Thermal Design Power)35 Watt
Transistoren291 Millionen
Features65 nm1.075V-1.175V
Die Größe143 mm2
Max. Temperatur100 °C
SocketPPGA478
FeaturesIntel 64, eX
64 Bit64 Bit wird unterstützt
Architecturex86
Vorgestellt am01.05.2008
Produktinformationen beim HerstellerIntel Celeron Dual-Core T1600

Benchmarks

3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1350 Points (3%)
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Ein oder mehrere Geräte zum Vergleich auswählen

In der folgenden Liste können sie Geräte suchen und für einen Vergleich auswählen.

Liste einschränken:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 14. 14:09:36

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Sep 2022 14:55:41 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.003s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 479 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#7 got single benchmarks 479 +0.01s ... 0.014s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.014s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.017s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.019s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.021s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.012s ... 0.032s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.035s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.037s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.039s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.042s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.043s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.01s ... 0.053s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.054s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.056s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.057s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.059s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.065s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.067s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.068s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.072s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#46 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.074s

#47 return log +0.018s ... 0.092s

Testberichte für den Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600 Prozessor

Acer eMachines G520 (Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD, 17.00")
» Acer eMachines G520 - Externer Test

Advent 5712 (Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950, 15.40")
» Advent 5712 - Externer Test

Chiligreen Platin MJ (Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD, 15.40")
» Chiligreen Platin MJ - Externer Test

Fujitsu Amilo Li3710 (Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD, 15.60")
» Fujitsu Amilo Li3710 - Externer Test

HP Compaq Presario CQ60-214EM (Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD, 15.60")
» HP Compaq Presario CQ60-214EM - Externer Test

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170

» Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren
Alle CPU Serien für Notebooks mit kurzer Beschreibung

» Mobile Prozessoren - Benchmarkliste
Sortier- und filterbare Benchmark-Liste

Prozessoren der Serie Celeron Dual-Core

» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
   2x 2.1 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100
   2x 1.9 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000
   2x 1.8 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700
   2x 1.83 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600
   2x 1.66 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500
   2x 1.87 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400
   2x 1.73 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
   2x 1.2 GHz

Ähnlich schnelle CPUs

+ Intel Celeron 2961Y
   2x 1.1 GHz
+ Intel Pentium 2129Y
   2x 1.1 GHz
+ Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400
   2x 1.4 GHz
+ AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58
   2x 1.9 GHz
+ AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-56
   2x 1.8 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600
   2x 1.66 GHz
- Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500
   2x 1.87 GHz
- Intel Pentium 977
   2x 1.4 GHz
- Intel Celeron 877
   2x 1.4 GHz
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-57
   2x 1.9 GHz
- Intel Core Duo T2050
   2x 1.6 GHz
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 27.08.2010 (Update:  9.07.2012)