Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700

Der Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700 ist ein langsam getakteter Doppelkernprozessor für Einsteiger-Notebooks. Er basiert auf den alten Merom Kern, bietet jedoch im Vergleich zu den Core 2 Duo Prozessoren deutlich weniger Features (weniger Stromsparmechanismen, keine Hardware Virtualisierung, ...). Laut Intel unterstützt die CPU kein Speedstep, jedoch sind Versionen im Handel mit Speedstep gesichtet worden.

SerieIntel Celeron Dual-Core
CodenameMerom
Serie: Celeron Dual-Core Merom
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T17001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 compare1.87 GHz2 / 2
Taktung1830 MHz
Front Side Bus667
Level 2 Cache1 MB
Anzahl von Kernen / Threads2 / 2
Stromverbrauch (TDP = Thermal Design Power)35 Watt
Transistoren291 Millionen
Features65 nm1.075V-1.175V
Die Größe143 mm2
Max. Temperatur100 °C
SocketPPGA478
FeaturesIntel 64, eX, SSE3
64 Bit64 Bit wird unterstützt
Architecturex86
Vorgestellt am07.12.2008
Produktinformationen beim HerstellerIntel Celeron Dual-Core T1700

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1750 Punkte (16%)
+ 1 Einzelwerte im Detail   + Vergleichsdiagramm einblenden
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3270 Punkte (4%)
+ 1 Einzelwerte im Detail   + Vergleichsdiagramm einblenden
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1456 Points (3%)
+ 1 Einzelwerte im Detail   + Vergleichsdiagramm einblenden
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
33.8 s (7%)
+ 1 Einzelwerte im Detail   + Vergleichsdiagramm einblenden
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
75 s (3%)
+ 1 Einzelwerte im Detail   + Vergleichsdiagramm einblenden
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
15600 MIPS (7%)
+ 1 Einzelwerte im Detail   + Vergleichsdiagramm einblenden
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
11800 MFLOPS (9%)
+ 1 Einzelwerte im Detail   + Vergleichsdiagramm einblenden
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Ein oder mehrere Geräte zum Vergleich auswählen

In der folgenden Liste können sie Geräte suchen und für einen Vergleich auswählen.

Liste einschränken:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 30. 08:29:38

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 29 Jun 2022 16:32:55 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.003s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 482 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#7 got single benchmarks 482 +0.005s ... 0.009s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.01s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.014s ... 0.024s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.027s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.03s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.032s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.035s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.04s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.042s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.043s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.046s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.048s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.049s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.053s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.053s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.056s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.057s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.058s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.061s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.062s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.065s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.066s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.07s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.073s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.074s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.077s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#59 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.079s

#60 return log +0.016s ... 0.096s

:: Noch keine Testberichte für diese CPU gefunden.

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!

» Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren
Alle CPU Serien für Notebooks mit kurzer Beschreibung

» Mobile Prozessoren - Benchmarkliste
Sortier- und filterbare Benchmark-Liste

Prozessoren der Serie Celeron Dual-Core

» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
   2x 2.1 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100
   2x 1.9 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000
   2x 1.8 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700
   2x 1.83 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600
   2x 1.66 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500
   2x 1.87 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1400
   2x 1.73 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
   2x 1.2 GHz

Ähnlich schnelle CPUs

+ AMD Turion X2 RM-72
   2x 2.1 GHz
+ AMD A4 Micro-6400T
   4x 1 GHz - 1.6 GHz
+ Intel Core Duo T2450
   2x 2 GHz
+ Intel Core 2 Duo T5550
   2x 1.83 GHz
+ Intel Core Duo T2400
   2x 1.83 GHz
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700
   2x 1.83 GHz
- AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-62
   2x 2.1 GHz
- Intel Pentium Dual Core T2390
   2x 1.86 GHz
- Intel Pentium Dual Core T2130
   2x 1.86 GHz
- Intel Core i3-380UM
   2x 1.33 GHz
- AMD Turion X2 RM-70
   2x 2 GHz
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 20.08.2010 (Update:  9.07.2012)