Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700 ist ein langsam getakteter Doppelkernprozessor für Einsteiger-Notebooks. Er basiert auf den alten Merom Kern, bietet jedoch im Vergleich zu den Core 2 Duo Prozessoren deutlich weniger Features (weniger Stromsparmechanismen, keine Hardware Virtualisierung, ...). Laut Intel unterstützt die CPU kein Speedstep, jedoch sind Versionen im Handel mit Speedstep gesichtet worden.

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 ist ein langsam getakteter Doppelkernprozessor für Einsteiger-Notebooks. Er basiert auf den alten Merom Kern, bietet jedoch im Vergleich zu den Core 2 Duo Prozessoren deutlich weniger Features (weniger Stromsparmechanismen, keine Hardware Virtualisierung, ...). Laut Intel unterstützt die CPU kein Speedstep, jedoch sind Versionen im Handel mit Speedstep gesichtet worden.

show full text
ModelIntel Celeron Dual-Core T1700Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreIntel Celeron Dual-Core
CodenameMeromMerom
Serie: Celeron Dual-Core Merom
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700 « 1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T15001.87 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T17001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 « 1.87 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1830 MHz1866 MHz
FSB667533
L2 Cache1 MB512 KB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors291 Million
65 nm, 1.075V-1.175V65 nm, 1.075-1.175V
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPPGA478
FeaturesIntel 64, eX, SSE3Intel 64, eX
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1750 Points (11%)
1625 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3270 Points (2%)
2960 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1456 Points (3%)
1400 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
33.8 s (7%)
39 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
75 s (3%)
91 s (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
15600 MIPS (7%)
15900 MIPS (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
11800 MFLOPS (9%)
12000 MFLOPS (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 → 93% n=7

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 10. 09:02:09

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 482 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 428 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1728543729s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 10 Oct 2024 05:17:16 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.001s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.001s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 482 +0.001s ... 0.002s

#8 got single benchmarks 482 +0.003s ... 0.005s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 428 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#10 got single benchmarks 428 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.008s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.014s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.017s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)