Notebookcheck Logo

Telechips TCC8803 1GHz vs HiSilicon Kirin 910T vs HiSilicon Hi6262

Telechips TCC8803 1GHz

► remove from comparison TCC8803 1GHz

ARM Mali 2D/3D graphics accelerator, DDR / DDR2 / LP-DDR2 / LP-DDR2 memory interface, LVDS Transmitter, HDMI 1.4, Composite TV-Out (NTSC / PAL), USB 2.0 HS OTG, USB 2.0 host, USB 1.1 HOST, EHI (External Host Interface), UART, NAND Flash Interface

Telechips' TCC88xx application processor will redefine the mobile device of tomorrow with new' innovative user experience by PC-like web browsing, 1080p full HD video record & playback, intuitive user interfaces, location based services and next generation social networking applications. TCC88xx supports development of planned features for the Tablet PC and HMP of tomorrow with tremendous performance and programmability to support new applications yet to be imagined. TCC88xx is equipped with hardwired VPU/GPU/ISP to maximize multimedia experience at its peak level.

 

HiSilicon Kirin 910T

► remove from comparison

Der HiSilicon Kirin 910T ist ein ARM-basierter Quad-Core-SoC für (Android-)Smartphones und Tablets, der im ersten Halbjahr 2014 zusammen mit dem Huawei Ascend P7 vorgestellt wurde. Neben vier Cortex-A9-Kernen (max. 1,8 GHz) integriert der Chip auch eine Mali-450 MP4 Grafikeinheit, einen Single-Channel LPDDR3-1600-Speichercontroller sowie ein LTE Cat. 4 Modem.

Die CPU-Performance ordnet sich dank der hochtaktenden Cortex-A9-Kerne im oberen Mittelfeld ein, sodass der 910T in etwa mit einem Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 (1,7 - 1,9 GHz Krait) vergleichbar ist. Dies genügt, um Browsing und andere typische Android-Anwendungen zügig zu bewältigen.

Die mit 533 MHz taktende Mali-450 MP4 sorgt für eine ansprechende Grafikleistung auf dem Niveau der Qualcomm Adreno 320. Damit werden auch anspruchsvolle Android-Spiele in hoher Auflösung zumeist flüssig dargestellt.

Trotz Fertigung in einem aktuellen 28-Nanometer-Prozess (TSMC HPM) dürfte die Leistungsaufnahme des Kirin 910T durchschnittlich bis hoch ausfallen, was auf die vergleichsweise hohen Taktraten zurückzuführen ist. Demzufolge kann der SoC in mittelgroßen Smartphones, aber auch Tablets eingesetzt werden.

HiSilicon Hi6262

► remove from comparison

show full text
ModelTelechips TCC8803 1GHzHiSilicon Kirin 910THiSilicon Hi6262
Series HiSilicon
Serie:
newitem cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x1.4 GHz2 cores
Apple A61 GHz2 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
HiSilicon Kirin 910T « 1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
newitem cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x1.4 GHz2 cores
Apple A61 GHz2 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 «  cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
Clock1000 MHz1800 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 14 / 4
Technology65 nm28 nm
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
CodenameCortex-A9
FeaturesARMv7, Mali-450 MP4 (533 MHz), LTE (Cat. 4), Single-Channel LPDDR3-1600 (6.4 GB/s)

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
11572 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
11485 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
13330 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1796 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
599 Points (12%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
13.4 MFLOPS (1%)
83.2 MFLOPS (8%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
254 MFLOPS (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
16135 ms (19%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1043 ms (11%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
2775 Points (2%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
7189 points (17%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
23864 Points (56%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
584 Iter./s (18%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
13307 Iter./s (44%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
12178 Points (2%)

Average Benchmarks Telechips TCC8803 1GHz → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 910T → 0% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 02. 01:29:56

#0 checking url part for id 3327 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6191 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13241 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.134s ... 0.135s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.135s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3327 +0.003s ... 0.138s

#8 got single benchmarks 3327 +0.009s ... 0.147s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6191 +0.003s ... 0.15s

#10 got single benchmarks 6191 +0.01s ... 0.16s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 13241 +0.003s ... 0.163s

#12 got single benchmarks 13241 +0.008s ... 0.171s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.171s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.058s ... 0.229s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.229s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)