Notebookcheck Logo

CSR8670 vs WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 vs unknown

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison  WM8950

Der VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 ist ein günstiger Einsteiger-SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er ist hauptsächlich für Android 4.x und Windows CE gedacht und bietet folgende Komponenten: 

  • Einzelkern Cortex-A9 Prozessor mit 1GHz Taktrate
  • ARM Mali 400(MP2?) Grafikkarte
  • Multi-Standard 1080p Video Decoding, H.264 Video Encoding
  • DDR3/LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller
  • Hardware Security Engine

ModelCSR8670WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950unknown
Series
Serie:
newitem cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x1.4 GHzcores
Apple A61 GHzcores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 « 0.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown cores
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
newitem cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x1.4 GHzcores
Apple A61 GHzcores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown «  cores
Clock80 MHz1000 MHz
Cores / Threads21 / 1
Announced
CodenameCortex-A9
iGPUARM Mali-400 MP
ArchitectureARMx86
Manufacturerwww.wondermedia.com.tw

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 unknown +
min: 1029     avg: 1038     median: 1038 (7%)     max: 1047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 unknown +
37732 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 unknown +
8923 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 unknown +
5039 Points (21%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 unknown +
1446 Points (39%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 unknown +
4484 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 unknown +
min: 687     avg: 887     median: 887 (37%)     max: 1087 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 unknown +
min: 2071     avg: 3146     median: 3146 (6%)     max: 4221 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 unknown +
min: 3175     avg: 4274     median: 4788 (48%)     max: 4860 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 unknown +
min: 8143     avg: 12683     median: 14710 (16%)     max: 15196 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 WM8950 +
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
13 MFLOPS (0%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 WM8950 +
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
12.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 unknown +
14953 ms (17%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 WM8950 +
2410 ms (23%)
7004 ms (66%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 unknown +
min: 2672     avg: 2713     median: 2712.5 (2%)     max: 2753 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 WM8950 +
2140 points (5%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 WM8950 +
1282 Points (8%)

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks unknown → 0% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 02. 01:35:02

#0 checking url part for id 6793 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1859 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.201s ... 0.202s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.202s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 6793 +0.003s ... 0.206s

#8 got single benchmarks 6793 +0.009s ... 0.214s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0.003s ... 0.217s

#10 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.009s ... 0.226s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 1859 +0.003s ... 0.229s

#12 got single benchmarks 1859 +0.567s ... 0.797s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.797s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.078s ... 0.875s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.875s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)