, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 ist ein stromsparender Prozessor für kleine und flache Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern und bietet die gesamten 6 MB Level 2 Cache. Dadurch ist die Performance deutlich besser, als bei anderen 2.1 GHz Core 2 Duo Modellen. Mit 17 Watt TDP eignet sich die CPU auch für flache Notebooks. Verbaut wurde der SL9600 z.B. im Apple MacBook Air, wobei hier jedoch durch häufiges Throtteln die Performance niedriger ist (daher stammen auch die schwächeren Benchmarks in unserer Datenbank).

Der C2D SL9600 bietet alle Features des Penryn Kerns wie Virtualisierung VT-x oder Trusted Execution.

Im Unterschied zu anderen Core 2 Duo Modellen, unterstützt der SL9600 nur den Socket BGA956.

Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 ist ein Notebookprozessor für flache Businessnotebooks. Die Besonderheit ist der TDP von 25 Watt in Kombination mit den vollen 6 MB Level 2 Cache (Core 2 Duo P Modelle meist nur 3 MB Level 2 Cache bei 25 Watt TDP).

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SL9600Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2130 MHz2400 MHz
FSB10661066
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt25 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm1.05-1.1545 nm0.9-1.2125
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA956BGA956
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, Intel VT, TXT, Intel64Virtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$316 U.S.$284 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SL9600Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2054 Points (18%)
min: 1516     avg: 2083     median: 2083 (19%)     max: 2650 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3281 Points (4%)
min: 2891     avg: 3950     median: 3950 (5%)     max: 5009 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 SL9600 +
4815 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 SL9600 +
2726 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 SL9600 +
min: 1163     avg: 1436     median: 1435.6 (17%)     max: 1708.09 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 SL9600 +
min: 38     avg: 43.1     median: 43.1 (9%)     max: 48.2 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 SP9400 +
2059 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
21 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1306 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 12450     avg: 15986     median: 15985.5 (8%)     max: 19521 MIPS
22185 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 11830     avg: 13238     median: 13237.5 (10%)     max: 14645 MFLOPS
17613 MFLOPS (14%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 SP9400 +
min: 3278     avg: 4346     median: 4346 (27%)     max: 5414 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 SL9600 +
5.1 Points (73%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 → 114% n=7

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 22. 10:13:04

#0 checking url part for id 516 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 420 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:10:47 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 516 +0s ... 0.006s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#48 got single benchmarks 516 +0.008s ... 0.014s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 420 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#51 got single benchmarks 420 +0.007s ... 0.023s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.024s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.025s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.03s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#78 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.03s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#80 return log +0.004s ... 0.034s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)