Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 vs Intel Core 2 Duo L7500

Intel Core 2 Duo T5800

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 ist ein Einstiegs Doppelkernprozessor basierend auf den alten Merom Kern mit lediglich 2 MB Level 2 Cache. Er bietet keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen und ist mit 2 GHz relativ langsam getaktet.

Intel Core 2 Duo L7500

► remove from comparison

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5800Intel Core 2 Duo L7500
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz1600 MHz
FSB800800
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt17 Watt
Transistors291 Million
Technology65 nm65 nm
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.85 °C
SocketPPGA478
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXT
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T5800

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 1988     avg: 2000     median: 2000 (18%)     max: 2013 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 3714     avg: 3755     median: 3716 (5%)     max: 3835 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 L7500 +
68.2 s (14%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 1629     avg: 1640     median: 1639.5 (3%)     max: 1650 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 28.06     avg: 28.5     median: 28.5 (6%)     max: 28.9 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 69.6     avg: 90.3     median: 90.3 (4%)     max: 111 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 1511     avg: 1521     median: 1520.5 (7%)     max: 1530 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 11028     avg: 14012     median: 14011.5 (7%)     max: 16995 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 7694     avg: 10270     median: 10270 (8%)     max: 12846 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4286     avg: 4884     median: 5025 (32%)     max: 5340 Points
3356 Points (21%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T5800 +
4.9 Points (70%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T5800 +
3533 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 → 67% n=1

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 11. 15:54:04

#0 checking url part for id 438 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 343 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:13:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#38 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#39 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#40 getting avg benchmarks for device 438 +0s ... 0.007s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.008s

#42 got single benchmarks 438 +0.019s ... 0.027s

#43 getting avg benchmarks for device 343 +0s ... 0.027s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#45 got single benchmarks 343 +0.007s ... 0.034s

#46 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.035s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.039s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.04s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#69 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.04s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#71 return log +0.004s ... 0.044s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)