Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5300

Intel Core 2 Duo T5800

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 ist ein Einstiegs Doppelkernprozessor basierend auf den alten Merom Kern mit lediglich 2 MB Level 2 Cache. Er bietet keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen und ist mit 2 GHz relativ langsam getaktet.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5550

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 ist ein Einstiegs-Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Merom-2M Kern und wird daher noch in 65nm gefertigt. Die Virtualisierungsfunktionen des Merom Kerns sind jedoch beim T5550 deaktiviert. Durch die geringe Taktrate, den relativ kleinen Cache und den langsamen FSB ist die Performance des T5550 limitiert und war auch in 2008 nur in der Einsteigerklasse anzusiedeln. Im Vergleich zu Pentium und Celeron Modellen, sollte der Core 2 Duo jedoch mehr Stromsparmechanismen bieten.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5300

► remove from comparison

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5800Intel Core 2 Duo T5550Intel Core 2 Duo T5300
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz1830 MHz1730 MHz
FSB800667533
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt34 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Technology65 nm65 nm, 1.075V-1.250V65 nm
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.85 °C100 °C
SocketPPGA478PPGA478
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXTIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T5800Intel Core 2 Duo T5550

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 1988     avg: 2000     median: 2000 (18%)     max: 2013 Points
91%
1 T5550 +
1826 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 3714     avg: 3755     median: 3716 (5%)     max: 3835 Points
91%
1 T5550 +
3397 Points (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 1629     avg: 1640     median: 1639.5 (3%)     max: 1650 Points
91%
1 T5550 +
1484 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 28.06     avg: 28.5     median: 28.5 (6%)     max: 28.9 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 69.6     avg: 90.3     median: 90.3 (4%)     max: 111 s
100%
1 T5300 +
84 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 1511     avg: 1521     median: 1520.5 (7%)     max: 1530 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 11028     avg: 14012     median: 14011.5 (7%)     max: 16995 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 7694     avg: 10270     median: 10270 (8%)     max: 12846 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 4286     avg: 4884     median: 5025 (32%)     max: 5340 Points
77%
1 T5550 +
3891 Points (24%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T5800 +
4.9 Points (70%)
98%
1 T5550 +
4.8 Points (69%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T5800 +
3533 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.18
log 27. 15:56:55

#0 checking url part for id 438 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 390 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 327 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 25 Sep 2022 13:14:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#62 composed specs +0s ... 0.003s

#63 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#64 getting avg benchmarks for device 438 +0s ... 0.004s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.004s

#66 got single benchmarks 438 +0.019s ... 0.023s

#67 getting avg benchmarks for device 390 +0s ... 0.024s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#69 got single benchmarks 390 +0.01s ... 0.034s

#70 getting avg benchmarks for device 327 +0s ... 0.035s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#72 got single benchmarks 327 +0.008s ... 0.043s

#73 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.044s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#100 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.049s

#101 return log +0s ... 0.049s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)