Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P9600

Intel Core 2 Duo T9900

► remove from comparison Intel T9900

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 Dual-Core CPU löst praktisch den Core 2 Extreme X9100 (ebenfalls 3.06 GHz und 6MB L2 Cache) ab und hat zusätzlich noch einen deutlich geringeren Stromverbrauch (35 versus 44 Watt TDP dank verbessertem Stepping und Enhanced Halt State (C1E)). Einzig der freie Multiplikator unterscheidet den X9100 noch vom T9900 und bietet einen Vorteil (die einfache Übertaktbarkeit per Erhöhung des Multiplikators). Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Dank der hohen Taktung von 3 GHz, ist die Performance für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen). Die alten Core 2 Quad Mobilprozessoren (Q9000, QX9300) werden dank der hohen Taktung bei den meisten Spielen deutlich geschlagen. Nur Anwendungen welche mehr als 2 parallele Threads effizient nutzen können (z.B. 3D Rendering) sind auf Quad-Core Prozessoren schneller. In der Einzelthreadperformance können erst die aktuellen Core i7 Modelle den T9900 deutlich abhängen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T9900 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

Intel Core 2 Duo P9600

► remove from comparison Intel P9600

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 ist ein sparsamer Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks der oberen Mittelklasse. Er gehört zur Penryn Serie und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Der Prozessor war in 2009 die schnellste 25 Watt (TDP) CPU. Der etwas schnellere P9700 braucht 3 Watt mehr.

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo P9600 ist vergleichbar mit dem ebenfalls mit 2.66 GHz getakteten Core 2 Duo T9550 und dadurch sollte sie für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen oder höherem Takt). Der alte Core 2 Quad Q9000 wird auch bei den meisten Anwendungen geschlagen, da er mit nur 2.0 GHz getaktet wird.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. 

Der Core 2 Duo P9600 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins)

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T9900Intel Core 2 Duo P9600
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
» Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock3060 MHz2660 MHz
FSB10661066
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt25 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm, 1.05-1.2125 V45 nm, 1.05-1.212V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketSocket P (BGA479, PGA478)PGA478
FeaturesSSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution TechnologyVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$530 U.S.$348 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T9900Intel Core 2 Duo P9600

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3353     avg: 3538     median: 3537.5 (32%)     max: 3722 Points
2971 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 6318     avg: 6886     median: 7094 (10%)     max: 7247 Points
5507 Points (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T9900 +
799 s (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T9900 +
25.1 s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2787 Points (6%)
2375 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T9900 +
15.3 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T9900 +
37.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T9900 +
972 s (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T9900 +
25083 MIPS (12%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T9900 +
20460 MFLOPS (16%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T9900 +
8922 Points (56%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T9900 +
5.7 Points (81%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T9900 +
6045 Points (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 → 82% n=3

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 30. 04:08:42

#0 checking url part for id 475 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 450 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 25 Sep 2022 13:14:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.01s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 475 +0s ... 0.01s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#48 got single benchmarks 475 +0.009s ... 0.019s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 450 +0.001s ... 0.02s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.02s

#51 got single benchmarks 450 +0.007s ... 0.027s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.028s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.033s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.034s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#70 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.034s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#72 return log +0.004s ... 0.038s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)