Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5270 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5470

Intel Core 2 Duo U7600

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 ist ein Stromspar-Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks aus 2006. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern und punktet mit 64-Bit Unterstütztung und einem TDP von lediglich 10 Watt. Mit einer maximalen Taktrate von 1.2 GHz ist er die mittlere Variante der Core 2 Duo U7000 Serie (U7500 1.1 GHz).

Intel Core 2 Duo T5270

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5270 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für günstige Laptops. Er basiert auf den Merom-Kern, bietet jedoch keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen. Trotz der geringen Taktrate, ist er auf relativ hohe 35Watt TDP spezifiziert und eignet sich daher nicht für kleine Notebooks.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5470

► remove from comparison

65nm

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo U7600Intel Core 2 Duo T5270Intel Core 2 Duo T5470
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMerom-2048Merom-2048Merom-2048
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom-2048
Intel Core 2 Duo T54701.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52701.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52501.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U77001.33 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U75001.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T54701.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T52701.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52501.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U77001.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U75001.06 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T54701.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52701.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52501.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U77001.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U75001.06 GHz2 / 2
Clock1200 MHz1400 MHz1600 MHz
FSB533800800
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP10 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Technology65 nm, 0.8 - 0.975V65 nm, 1.075V-1.250V65 nm
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPBGA479PPGA478
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo U7600Intel Core 2 Duo T5270

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 U7600 +
min: 1199     avg: 1263     median: 1263 (11%)     max: 1327 Points
113%
1 T5270 +
1427 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 U7600 +
min: 2260     avg: 2289     median: 2289 (3%)     max: 2318 Points
119%
1 T5270 +
2717 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 U7600 +
min: 61.2     avg: 68.6     median: 68.6 (14%)     max: 76 s
101%
1 T5270 +
65.8 s (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 U7600 +
min: 987     avg: 1008     median: 1008 (2%)     max: 1029 Points
135%
1 T5470 +
min: 1353     avg: 1365     median: 1364.5 (3%)     max: 1376 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
42.6 s (9%)
38.5 s (8%)
32 s (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T5270 +
16817 MIPS (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T5270 +
6253 MFLOPS (5%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 U7600 +
min: 2253     avg: 2532     median: 2606 (16%)     max: 2738 Points
142%
1 T5470 +
min: 3508     avg: 3713     median: 3713 (23%)     max: 3918 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 U7600 +
4.4 Points (63%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5270 → 101% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5470 → 103% n=1

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.18
log 07. 15:11:54

#0 checking url part for id 347 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 441 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 366 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:14:23 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.004s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.005s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#24 getting avg benchmarks for device 347 +0s ... 0.005s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#26 got single benchmarks 347 +0.013s ... 0.018s

#27 getting avg benchmarks for device 441 +0s ... 0.019s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#29 got single benchmarks 441 +0.005s ... 0.024s

#30 getting avg benchmarks for device 366 +0s ... 0.024s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#32 got single benchmarks 366 +0.008s ... 0.032s

#33 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.035s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#56 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.038s

#57 return log +0s ... 0.038s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)