Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 vs Rockchip RK3188

HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620

► remove from comparison

Coretex A9 Quad-Core - max 1.5 GHz, im Huawei Mediapad 10 FHD mit 1.2 GHz

Rockchip RK3188

Der Rockchip RK3188 ist ein leistungsstarker ARM-SoC, der in erster Linie für Tablets konzipiert wurde. Er integriert vier ARM Cortex-A9 CPU-Kerne mit NEON-Erweiterung und einer Taktrate von bis zu 1,8 GHz, eine Mali-400 MP4 Grafikkarte (bis zu 600 MHz, 24 GFLOPS) und einen Speichercontroller für (LP-)DDR2/DDR3. Die CPU- und Grafik-Performance liegt dank der hohen Taktraten etwas über anderen Cortex-A9 Quad-Cores wie dem Nvidia Tegra 3 oder Samsung Exynos 4412. Möglich wird dies durch eine fortschrittliche 28-Nanometer-Fertigung. Dennoch treibt die hohe Taktfrequenz die Leistungsaufnahme in die Höhe, sodass der RK3188 kaum in kompakten Smartphones eingesetzt wird.

show full text
ModelHiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620Rockchip RK3188
Series
Serie: Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHz2 cores
Apple A6 compare1 GHz2 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 « 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST compare2 cores
unknown compare cores
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 « 1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Clock1200 MHz1800 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
Technology40 nm28 nm
FeaturesARMv7Mali-400 MP4 (600 MHz), DDR2/DDR3 Memory Controller (max. 2 GByte)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
CodenameCortex-A9
iGPUARM Mali-400 MP4 (600 MHz)
Manufacturerwww.rock-chips.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 3209     avg: 4477     median: 4894 (4%)     max: 5167 Points
min: 5828     avg: 7773     median: 7936 (6%)     max: 8887 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 5354     avg: 5357     median: 5357 (4%)     max: 5360 Points
min: 5434     avg: 7724     median: 8025.5 (7%)     max: 8812 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 9142     avg: 9821     median: 9821 (8%)     max: 10500 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1094 Points (2%)
min: 1316     avg: 1410     median: 1421 (3%)     max: 1493 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
327 Points (6%)
min: 476     avg: 498.7     median: 504 (10%)     max: 516 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 439     avg: 489.9     median: 500 (4%)     max: 547 Points
min: 182     avg: 320     median: 272 (2%)     max: 506 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 940     avg: 1187     median: 1218 (11%)     max: 1290 Points
min: 326     avg: 687     median: 803 (7%)     max: 933 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 1793     avg: 2360     median: 2351 (5%)     max: 2731 Points
min: 1769     avg: 2044     median: 2035 (4%)     max: 2328 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 1000     avg: 1317     median: 1275 (3%)     max: 1591 Points
min: 924     avg: 1123     median: 1104 (2%)     max: 1341 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 1209     avg: 1573     median: 1557 (4%)     max: 1819 Points
min: 1130     avg: 1275     median: 1182 (3%)     max: 1512 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 92.3     avg: 133.3     median: 138.1 (5%)     max: 151.8 MFLOPS
min: 130     avg: 131.1     median: 131.1 (4%)     max: 132.1 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 37.8     avg: 44.2     median: 46.6 (5%)     max: 48.71 MFLOPS
min: 54.9     avg: 57.2     median: 57.2 (6%)     max: 59.4 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
26477 ms (31%)
13698 ms (16%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 856     avg: 2197     median: 1610 (18%)     max: 4026 ms
min: 849     avg: 1179     median: 1240 (14%)     max: 1388 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1522     avg: 1643     median: 1540 (15%)     max: 2080 ms
min: 702     avg: 986     median: 1086 (10%)     max: 1170 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 3092     avg: 3094     median: 3093.5 (3%)     max: 3095 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 4404     avg: 4736     median: 4736 (11%)     max: 5068 points
5287 points (12%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
min: 4820     avg: 5667     median: 5662 (37%)     max: 6713 Points
min: 7505     avg: 7723     median: 7807 (51%)     max: 7856 Points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
14434 Points (34%)
min: 2139     avg: 14154     median: 19571 (46%)     max: 20752 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
min: 92     avg: 191     median: 191 (6%)     max: 290 Iter./s
min: 179     avg: 329     median: 374 (11%)     max: 434 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
min: 8740     avg: 8897     median: 8897 (29%)     max: 9054 Iter./s
min: 10329     avg: 11213     median: 11588 (38%)     max: 11722 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 8223     avg: 8737     median: 8678 (1%)     max: 9118 Points
min: 9258     avg: 10743     median: 10965 (1%)     max: 11782 Points

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK3188 → 118% n=20

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 26. 06:29:08

#0 checking url part for id 3613 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4137 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.091s ... 0.092s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.092s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3613 +0.003s ... 0.095s

#7 got single benchmarks 3613 +0.019s ... 0.114s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4137 +0.003s ... 0.116s

#9 got single benchmarks 4137 +0.026s ... 0.143s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.143s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.117s ... 0.26s

#12 return log +0.024s ... 0.284s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)