Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600

Intel Core 2 Duo P7550

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Der P7550 ist baugleich zum Core 2 Duo P8400 und P7570, bietet jedoch keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen (VT-x) und keine Unterstützung für Trusted Execution Technology. Die Architektur des OEM Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Für Multimediaanwendungen und anspruchslose Spiele, sollte die Performance des Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 ausreichen. Im Vergleich zu AMD sollte die Performance auf Niveau der schnellsten Turion II Ultra mit 2.4 - 2.6 GHz liegen. Anspruchsvolle Spielefans sollten jedoch eher zu höher getakteten Core 2 Duo CPUs greifen (>2.5 GHz).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 ist ein stromsparender Prozessor für Subnotebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn-3M Kern und bietet daher 3MB Level 2 Cache und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Er bietet alle Features des Penryn Kerns, wie Virtualisierung und Trusted Execution. Die Performance ist durch die geringe Taktrate etwas begrenzt.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P7550Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2260 MHz1600 MHz
FSB1066800
L2 Cache3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt10 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm45 nm0.775-1.1V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C
SocketPGA478BGA956
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, Intel 64, ExBitEnhanced Speedstep, VT, TXT
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P7550Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600
L1 Cache128 KB
$289 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 P7550 +
2439 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 P7550 +
4645 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 P7550 +
1112 s (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 P7550 +
35.6 s (7%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 P7550 +
2004 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 P7550 +
22.7 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 P7550 +
53.6 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 P7550 +
1278 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 P7550 +
17680 MIPS (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 P7550 +
16630 MFLOPS (13%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 P7550 +
4946 Points (31%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 18. 01:07:30

#0 checking url part for id 525 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 473 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:13:41 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.003s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 525 +0s ... 0.007s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#48 got single benchmarks 525 +0.006s ... 0.014s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 473 +0s ... 0.014s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#51 got single benchmarks 473 +0.006s ... 0.02s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.021s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#63 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.024s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#65 return log +0.004s ... 0.028s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)