Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600

Intel Core 2 Duo P7550

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Der P7550 ist baugleich zum Core 2 Duo P8400 und P7570, bietet jedoch keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen (VT-x) und keine Unterstützung für Trusted Execution Technology. Die Architektur des OEM Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Für Multimediaanwendungen und anspruchslose Spiele, sollte die Performance des Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 ausreichen. Im Vergleich zu AMD sollte die Performance auf Niveau der schnellsten Turion II Ultra mit 2.4 - 2.6 GHz liegen. Anspruchsvolle Spielefans sollten jedoch eher zu höher getakteten Core 2 Duo CPUs greifen (>2.5 GHz).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Intel Core 2 Duo T6670

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 ist ein Einstiegsprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern, bietet jedoch nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache und ist mit 2.2 GHz relativ langsam getaktet. Im Unterschied zum C2D T6600, bietet der T6670 Virtualisierungsfunktionen VT-x und eine höhere maximale Temperatur von 105°C. Dadurch eignet er sich eher für Business Notebooks.

Durch die mittelmäßige Taktfrequenz und den kleinen Level 2 Cache, kann die CPU bei modernen und anspruchsvollen Spielen durchaus limitieren (z.B. große Multiplayerschlachten bei Supreme Commander). Für die mittelmäßig anspruchsvolle (nicht professionelle) Anwendungen wie Office, Entry-Level Videoschnitt, Bildbearbeitung, Internet und casual Gaming sollte die Leistung jedoch ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T6670 passt in den Socket P (PGA478)

 

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 ist ein stromsparender Prozessor für kleine und flache Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern und bietet die gesamten 6 MB Level 2 Cache. Dadurch ist die Performance deutlich besser, als bei anderen 2.1 GHz Core 2 Duo Modellen. Mit 17 Watt TDP eignet sich die CPU auch für flache Notebooks. Verbaut wurde der SL9600 z.B. im Apple MacBook Air, wobei hier jedoch durch häufiges Throtteln die Performance niedriger ist (daher stammen auch die schwächeren Benchmarks in unserer Datenbank).

Der C2D SL9600 bietet alle Features des Penryn Kerns wie Virtualisierung VT-x oder Trusted Execution.

Im Unterschied zu anderen Core 2 Duo Modellen, unterstützt der SL9600 nur den Socket BGA956.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P7550Intel Core 2 Duo T6670Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2260 MHz2200 MHz2130 MHz
FSB10668001066
L2 Cache3 MB2 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt35 Watt17 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million410 Million
45 nm45 nm45 nm1.05-1.15
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketPGA478PGA478BGA956
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, Intel 64, ExBitEnhanced Speedstep, Intel VT, TXT, Intel64
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P7550Intel Core 2 Duo T6670Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600
L1 Cache128 KB
$316 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2439 Points (22%)
min: 2352     avg: 2365     median: 2365 (21%)     max: 2378 Points
2054 Points (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4645 Points (6%)
min: 4428     avg: 4434     median: 4430 (6%)     max: 4444 Points
3281 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 SL9600 +
4815 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 SL9600 +
2726 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1112 s (13%)
min: 1163     avg: 1436     median: 1435.5 (17%)     max: 1708 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
35.6 s (7%)
min: 34.97     avg: 52     median: 52 (10%)     max: 69.1 s
min: 38     avg: 43.1     median: 43.1 (9%)     max: 48.2 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 P7550 +
2004 Points (4%)
92%
1 T6670 +
1850 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22.7 s (5%)
min: 23.87     avg: 33.4     median: 33.4 (7%)     max: 43 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
53.6 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1278 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
17680 MIPS (8%)
min: 12450     avg: 15986     median: 15985.5 (8%)     max: 19521 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
16630 MFLOPS (13%)
min: 11830     avg: 13238     median: 13237.5 (10%)     max: 14645 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 P7550 +
4946 Points (31%)
92%
1 T6670 +
min: 4384     avg: 4567     median: 4559 (29%)     max: 4757 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 SL9600 +
5.1 Points (73%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 T6670 +
5.6 Points (72%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 → 87% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 → 91% n=9

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 06. 15:22:26

#0 checking url part for id 525 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 467 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 516 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.008s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#81 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#82 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#83 getting avg benchmarks for device 525 +0s ... 0.009s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#85 got single benchmarks 525 +0.006s ... 0.015s

#86 getting avg benchmarks for device 467 +0s ... 0.015s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#88 got single benchmarks 467 +0.009s ... 0.024s

#89 getting avg benchmarks for device 516 +0s ... 0.025s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#91 got single benchmarks 516 +0.005s ... 0.031s

#92 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.031s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.032s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.033s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.041s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#132 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#135 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.042s

#136 return log +0s ... 0.042s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)