, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P9700

Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600

► remove from comparison Intel SP9600

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 ist ein sparsamer High-End Dual Core Prozessor für flache Notebooks. Er basiert auf dem Core 2 Duo P9500, wird jedoch nur in BGA (Ball Grid Array) Ausführung angeboten zum direkten Auflöten auf das Mainboard. Dadurch ist die Package Größe des Prozessors auch deutlich geringer (22m2 versus 35mm2 beim P9500). Der SP9600 kann dadurch in sehr flachen aber trotzdem leistungsstarken Notebooks eingesetzt werden (z.B. Lenovo Thinkpad T400s). Der Stromverbrauch von max. 25 W TDP ist jedoch identisch

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo SP9600 ist vergleichbar mit dem ebenfalls mit 2.53 GHz getakteten Core 2 Duo T9400 und dadurch sollte sie für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen oder höherem Takt). Der alte Core 2 Quad Q9000 wird auch bei den meisten Anwendungen geschlagen, da er mit nur 2.0 GHz getaktet wird.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

 

Intel Core 2 Duo P9700

► remove from comparison Intel P9700

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 ist ein schneller und trotzdem sparsamer Doppelkernprozessor der Penryn Reihe für Notebooks. Die CPU ist die schnellste Variante der Core 2 Duo P-Serie, braucht jedoch mit 28 Watt etwas mehr Strom als die kleineren P-Modelle. Im Vergleich zur T-Serie (welche mit 35 Watt spezifiziert ist), ist der P9700 jedoch sparsam.

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo P9700 ist vergleichbar mit dem ebenfalls mit 2.8 GHz getakteten Core 2 Duo T9600 und dadurch sollte sie für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen). Die alten Core 2 Quad Mobilprozessoren (Q9000, QX9300) werden dank der hohen Taktung des P9700 bei den meisten Spielen geschlagen (da Spiele aus 2009 meist nicht mehr als 2 Kerne auslasten).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. 

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SP9600Intel Core 2 Duo P9700
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2530 MHz2800 MHz
FSB10661066
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt28 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm1.05-1.15V45 nm1.012-1.175V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA956PGA478
FeaturesVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution Technology, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitVirtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$316 U.S.$348 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SP9600Intel Core 2 Duo P9700

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2836 Points (25%)
min: 3060     avg: 3330     median: 3425 (31%)     max: 3506 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
5309 Points (7%)
min: 5680     avg: 6143     median: 6133 (8%)     max: 6616 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1863 s (22%)
1737 s (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 30.3     avg: 44.4     median: 44.4 (9%)     max: 58.485 s
54.6 s (11%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2189 Points (5%)
min: 2506     avg: 2552     median: 2540 (5%)     max: 2610 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
18 s (4%)
16 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
43 s (2%)
39 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1117 s (5%)
1030 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
23240 MIPS (11%)
25753 MIPS (12%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
18549 MFLOPS (14%)
19374 MFLOPS (15%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
7587 Points (48%)
7348 Points (46%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 SP9600 +
5.4 Points (77%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 P9700 +
5396 Points (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 → 106% n=11

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 28. 10:26:17

#0 checking url part for id 500 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 476 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:10:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 500 +0s ... 0.01s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#48 got single benchmarks 500 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 476 +0s ... 0.017s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#51 got single benchmarks 476 +0.008s ... 0.025s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.026s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.033s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#82 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.033s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#84 return log +0.003s ... 0.037s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)