Crosscall Core-Z5
Ausstattung / Datenblatt

Crosscall Core-Z5 (Core Serie)
Prozessor
unknown
Grafikkarte
unknown
RAM
4 GB
Bildschirm
6.08 Zoll 19:9, 1520 x 720 Pixel 277 PPI, Capacitive, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, spiegelnd: ja
Massenspeicher
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB
Anschlüsse
USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Anschlüsse: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD, Sensoren: Accelerometer, Proximity, Light sensor, Gyro, E-Compass
Netzwerk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, GSM, UMTS, LTE, 5G, Dual SIM, GPS
Abmessungen
Höhe x Breite x Tiefe (in mm): 14 x 175 x 81
Akku
4950 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Betriebssystem
Android 12
Kamera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Sonstiges
Tastatur: OnScreen
Gewicht
281 g
Links
Preisvergleich
Bewertung:
Durchschnitt von 2 Bewertungen (aus 3 Tests)
Durchschnitt von 2 Bewertungen (aus 3 Tests)
Preis: - %, Leistung: 90%, Ausstattung: - %, Bildschirm: 40% Mobilität: 85%, Gehäuse: 80%, Ergonomie: 80%, Emissionen: - %
Testberichte für das Crosscall Core-Z5
Crosscall Core-Z5 Camera test
Quelle: DxOMark
EN→DE
The Crosscall Core-Z5 smartphone from the French maker of durable phones is primarily intended for users who need devices that are resistant to shocks and drops and that can perform in extreme conditions.The Core-Z5 is also the brand’s first 5G phone, and it finds itself in our premium price segment ($600 to $799). When it comes to image quality from the single rear camera, however, the Core-Z5 still has far to go before it can compete with other phones in this segment. The camera, in general, is capable of capturing basic correct images in standard outdoor conditions, where the device is most likely to be used. In our testing, the Core-X5’s photos and videos turned out better than those taken with the Action-X5, a Crosscall model we evaluated previously, but the Core-Z5’s image quality was severely limited because of the lack of an ultra-wide camera module, which affected the device’s zoom and overall score. The lack of a tele module on the Core-Z5, a feature that is commonly found on devices in this price range, also hindered the device’s camera performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.12.2022
Quelle: DxOMark
EN→DEThe Crosscall Core-Z5 smartphone from the French maker of durable phones is primarily intended for users who need devices that are resistant to shocks and drops and that can perform in extreme conditions.The Core-Z5 is also the brand’s first 5G phone, and it finds itself in our premium price segment ($600 to $799). When it comes to image quality from the single rear camera, however, the Core-Z5 still has far to go before it can compete with other phones in this segment. The camera, in general, is capable of capturing basic correct images in standard outdoor conditions, where the device is most likely to be used. In our testing, the Core-X5’s photos and videos turned out better than those taken with the Action-X5, a Crosscall model we evaluated previously, but the Core-Z5’s image quality was severely limited because of the lack of an ultra-wide camera module, which affected the device’s zoom and overall score. The lack of a tele module on the Core-Z5, a feature that is commonly found on devices in this price range, also hindered the device’s camera performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 23.12.2022
Test Labo du Crosscall Core-Z5 : un smartphone increvable qui a de la ressource
Quelle: L' Eclaireur FNAC
FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Leistung: 100% Bildschirm: 20% Mobilität: 90%
Quelle: L' Eclaireur FNAC
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.01.2023
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Leistung: 100% Bildschirm: 20% Mobilität: 90%
Crosscall Core-Z5
Quelle: Les Numeriques
FR→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Les Numeriques
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.12.2022
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Kommentar
unknown:
3D Spiele sind auf diesen Vertretern nur in Ausnahmen spielbar, grundsätzlich sind die Grafiklösungen hierfür jedoch nicht geeignet. Office Programme und Internet surfen dürfte jedoch ohne Problem möglich sein.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
unknown: » Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .