Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300 vs Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300

► remove from comparison

Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000

► remove from comparison

Der Core 2 Extreme X9000 war der damals schnellste Dual Core Prozessor mit 2.8 GHz und 6 MB Level 2 Cache. Er wurde später vom 3.06 GHz schnellen Core 2 Extreme X9100 abgelöst und besitzt wie dieser einen freien Multiplikator zur einfachen Übertaktung. Mit 44 Watt TDP ist der X9000 deutlich höher spezifiziert als andere CPUs der Core 2 Duo Serie (25-35W). Der modernere P9700 leistet z.B. ungefähr das Gleiche bei 25 Watt TDP.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Extreme QX9300Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000
SeriesIntel Core 2 ExtremeIntel Core 2 Extreme
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Extreme Penryn
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300 « 2.53 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Core 2 Extreme X9100 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Extreme X90002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX93002.53 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Core 2 Extreme X9100 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000 « 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2530 MHz2800 MHz
FSB1066800
L1 Cache256 KB128 KB
L2 Cache12 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 2
TDP45 Watt44 Watt
Transistors820 Million410 Million
45 nm, 1.05-1.175V45 nm, 1.0-1.275V
Die Size214 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketPGA478PGA478
FeaturesIntel VT-x, Enhanced SpeedStep, Intel 64, Execute Disable BitVirtualization, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$1038 U.S.$851 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 QX9300 +
2.6 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2959     avg: 3131     median: 3113.5 (19%)     max: 3338 Points
min: 3070     avg: 3189     median: 3072 (19%)     max: 3425 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 10716     avg: 10914     median: 10881.5 (8%)     max: 11176 Points
min: 5818     avg: 6084     median: 5843 (4%)     max: 6590 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
15.7 s (3%)
29 s (6%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3523     avg: 3750     median: 3780 (8%)     max: 3915 Points
min: 2532     avg: 2550     median: 2549 (5%)     max: 2570 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
18 s (4%)
min: 16     avg: 16.7     median: 16.8 (4%)     max: 17 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
44 s (2%)
min: 40     avg: 40.1     median: 40 (2%)     max: 40.17 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1159 s (5%)
min: 1092     avg: 1115     median: 1115 (5%)     max: 1138 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
46468 MIPS (22%)
min: 22914     avg: 24345     median: 24344.5 (12%)     max: 25775 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
34653 MFLOPS (27%)
min: 18932     avg: 19711     median: 19711 (15%)     max: 20490 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 7792     avg: 8239     median: 8160 (17%)     max: 8764 Points
min: 7036     avg: 7392     median: 7470 (15%)     max: 7669 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 X9000 +
5.6 Points (80%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 10188     avg: 10370     median: 10339 (9%)     max: 10548 Points
5613 Points (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000 → 79% n=11

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 16:58:06

#0 checking url part for id 418 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 378 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 418 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 418 +0.027s ... 0.037s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 378 +0.003s ... 0.04s

#9 got single benchmarks 378 +0.015s ... 0.054s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.054s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.075s ... 0.129s

#12 return log +0.026s ... 0.155s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)