, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
 
 
 
 

Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300

Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 ist ein stromsparender Prozessor für Subnotebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn-3M Kern und bietet daher 3MB Level 2 Cache und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Er bietet alle Features des Penryn Kerns, wie Virtualisierung und Trusted Execution. Die Performance ist durch die geringe Taktrate begrenzt.

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300

► remove from comparison

Der Core 2 Duo SL9300 ist ein stromsparender Low Voltage Prozessor für dünne und leichte Notebooks. Er bietet den vollen 6MB Level 2 Cache des Penryn Kerns und bietet dadurch eine bessere Performance als andere 1.6 GHz Core 2 Duo Prozessoren mit weniger Cache (1-3MB üblich). Er bietet die Virtualisierungsfunktionen VT-x und auch Trusted Execution Technology für Business Anwender.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SU9400Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1400 MHz1600 MHz
FSB8001066
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache3 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP10 Watt17 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
Technology45 nm1.05-1.15V45 nm
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA956BGA956
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, VT, TXTEnhanced Speedstep, Intel VT, TXT
Architecturex86x86
$262 U.S.$284 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SU9400Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 SU9400 +
0.8 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 SU9400 +
min: 1500     avg: 1594     median: 1595.5 (14%)     max: 1794 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 SU9400 +
min: 2660     avg: 2894     median: 2879 (4%)     max: 3253 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 SU9400 +
3266 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 SU9400 +
1707 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 SU9400 +
min: 1784     avg: 2131     median: 1877.5 (22%)     max: 3227.14 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 SU9400 +
min: 55     avg: 66.6     median: 59.3 (12%)     max: 99.964 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 SU9400 +
min: 1125     avg: 1196     median: 1197 (3%)     max: 1271 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 SU9400 +
min: 32     avg: 33.4     median: 33 (7%)     max: 35.9 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 SU9400 +
min: 74     avg: 78.6     median: 78.5 (3%)     max: 82.3 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 SU9400 +
min: 1790     avg: 1871     median: 1896.5 (8%)     max: 1936 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 SU9400 +
min: 11610     avg: 12619     median: 12820 (6%)     max: 12931 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 SU9400 +
min: 8763     avg: 9718     median: 10109 (8%)     max: 10270 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 SU9400 +
min: 3097     avg: 3602     median: 3283.5 (21%)     max: 4635 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 SU9400 +
4.6 Points (66%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 SU9400 +
min: 4.3     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (58%)     max: 4.7 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 SU9400 +
2757 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 19. 11:48:24

#0 checking url part for id 424 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 423 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:10:47 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.007s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 424 +0s ... 0.008s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.009s

#48 got single benchmarks 424 +0.024s ... 0.033s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 423 +0s ... 0.033s

#50 got single benchmarks 423 +0s ... 0.034s

#51 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.034s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.036s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.041s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#118 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.041s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#128 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.042s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#130 return log +0.003s ... 0.046s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)