, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600

Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 ist ein stromsparender Prozessor für Subnotebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn-3M Kern und bietet daher 3MB Level 2 Cache und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Er bietet alle Features des Penryn Kerns, wie Virtualisierung und Trusted Execution. Die Performance ist durch die geringe Taktrate begrenzt.

Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600

► remove from comparison Intel SP9600

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 ist ein sparsamer High-End Dual Core Prozessor für flache Notebooks. Er basiert auf dem Core 2 Duo P9500, wird jedoch nur in BGA (Ball Grid Array) Ausführung angeboten zum direkten Auflöten auf das Mainboard. Dadurch ist die Package Größe des Prozessors auch deutlich geringer (22m2 versus 35mm2 beim P9500). Der SP9600 kann dadurch in sehr flachen aber trotzdem leistungsstarken Notebooks eingesetzt werden (z.B. Lenovo Thinkpad T400s). Der Stromverbrauch von max. 25 W TDP ist jedoch identisch

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo SP9600 ist vergleichbar mit dem ebenfalls mit 2.53 GHz getakteten Core 2 Duo T9400 und dadurch sollte sie für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen oder höherem Takt). Der alte Core 2 Quad Q9000 wird auch bei den meisten Anwendungen geschlagen, da er mit nur 2.0 GHz getaktet wird.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

 

Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600
Intel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
PenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
1400 MHz2530 MHz
8001066
128 KB128 KB
3 MB6 MB
2 / 22 / 2
10 25
410 410
45 1.05-1.15V45 1.05-1.15V
107 mm2107 mm2
105 °C105 °C
BGA956BGA956
Enhanced Speedstep, VT, TXTVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution Technology, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$262 U.S.$316 U.S.
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 SU9400 +
0.8 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 SU9400 +
3266 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 SU9400 +
1707 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1784     avg: 2131     median: 1877.5 (22%)     max: 3227.14 s
1863 s (22%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 55     avg: 66.6     median: 59.3 (12%)     max: 99.964 s
min: 30.3     avg: 44.4     median: 44.4 (9%)     max: 58.485 s
2189 Points (12%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 11610     avg: 12619     median: 12820 (6%)     max: 12931 MIPS
23240 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 8763     avg: 9718     median: 10109 (8%)     max: 10270 MFLOPS
18549 MFLOPS (14%)
7587 Points (48%)
5.4 Points (77%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 SU9400 +
min: 4.3     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (58%)     max: 4.7 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 SU9400 +
2757 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 → 148% n=12

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.17
log 19. 23:53:29

#0 checking url part for id 424 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 500 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 15 Oct 2021 13:09:32 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.008s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 424 +0s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 424 +0.019s ... 0.027s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 500 +0s ... 0.027s

#9 got single benchmarks 500 +0.005s ... 0.032s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.041s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.045s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)