, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6670

Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 ist ein stromsparender Prozessor für Subnotebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn-3M Kern und bietet daher 3MB Level 2 Cache und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Er bietet alle Features des Penryn Kerns, wie Virtualisierung und Trusted Execution. Die Performance ist durch die geringe Taktrate begrenzt.

Intel Core 2 Duo T6670

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 ist ein Einstiegsprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern, bietet jedoch nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache und ist mit 2.2 GHz relativ langsam getaktet. Im Unterschied zum C2D T6600, bietet der T6670 Virtualisierungsfunktionen VT-x und eine höhere maximale Temperatur von 105°C. Dadurch eignet er sich eher für Business Notebooks.

Durch die mittelmäßige Taktfrequenz und den kleinen Level 2 Cache, kann die CPU bei modernen und anspruchsvollen Spielen durchaus limitieren (z.B. große Multiplayerschlachten bei Supreme Commander). Für die mittelmäßig anspruchsvolle (nicht professionelle) Anwendungen wie Office, Entry-Level Videoschnitt, Bildbearbeitung, Internet und casual Gaming sollte die Leistung jedoch ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T6670 passt in den Socket P (PGA478)

 

Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400Intel Core 2 Duo T6670
Intel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
PenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
1400 MHz2200 MHz
800800
128 KB
3 MB2 MB
2 / 22 / 2
10 35
410 410
45 1.05-1.15V45
107 mm2107 mm2
105 °C105 °C
BGA956PGA478
Enhanced Speedstep, VT, TXT
Architecturex86x86
$262 U.S.
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400Intel Core 2 Duo T6670

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 SU9400 +
0.8 Points (2%)
min: 2352     avg: 2365     median: 2365 (21%)     max: 2378
min: 4428     avg: 4434     median: 4430 (7%)     max: 4444
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 SU9400 +
3266 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 SU9400 +
1707 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1784     avg: 2131     median: 1877.5 (22%)     max: 3227.14 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 55     avg: 66.6     median: 59.3 (12%)     max: 99.964 s
min: 34.975     avg: 52.1     median: 52.1 (10%)     max: 69.14 s
1850 Points (10%)
min: 23.868     avg: 33.4     median: 33.4 (7%)     max: 43 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 11610     avg: 12619     median: 12820 (6%)     max: 12931 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 8763     avg: 9718     median: 10109 (8%)     max: 10270 MFLOPS
min: 4384     avg: 4567     median: 4559 (29%)     max: 4757 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 4.3     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (58%)     max: 4.7 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 SU9400 +
2757 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 → 116% n=12

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 23. 20:45:07

#0 checking url part for id 424 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 467 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 22 Jun 2021 13:08:13 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 424 +0s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 424 +0.021s ... 0.029s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 467 +0s ... 0.029s

#9 got single benchmarks 467 +0.01s ... 0.039s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.05s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.054s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)