Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Duo T2300E vs Intel Core Duo T2500 vs Intel Core Duo U2500

Intel Core Duo T2300E

► remove from comparison

Intel Core Duo T2500

► remove from comparison

Intel Core Duo U2500

► remove from comparison

ModelIntel Core Duo T2300EIntel Core Duo T2500Intel Core Duo U2500
SeriesIntel Core DuoIntel Core DuoIntel Core Duo
CodenameYonahYonahYonah
Serie: Core Duo Yonah
Intel Core Duo T27002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T26002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T25002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L25001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23501.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T22501.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2300E « 1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L24001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L23001.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T20501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U25001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U24001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T27002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T26002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2500 « 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L25001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23501.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T22501.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2300E1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L24001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L23001.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T20501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U25001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U24001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T27002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T26002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T25002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L25001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23501.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T22501.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2300E1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L24001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L23001.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T20501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U2500 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U24001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1660 MHz2000 MHz1200 MHz
FSB667667533
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP31 Watt31 Watt9 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm65 nm
FeaturesEIST, execution Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1074 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2021 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1593     avg: 1617.7     median: 1621 (3%)     max: 1639 Points
922 Points (2%)
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 49     avg: 49     median: 49 (108%)     max: 45.52 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 73     avg: 75.5     median: 75.5 (80%)     max: 78 s
min: 120     avg: 120     median: 120 (127%)     max: 94.7 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1761 s (23%)
2628 s (34%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
13519 MIPS (6%)
8178 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
9983 MFLOPS (8%)
6009 MFLOPS (5%)
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
545 Points (37%)
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 2859     avg: 3655.3     median: 3662.5 (8%)     max: 4450 Points
min: 1962     avg: 1985     median: 1985 (4%)     max: 2008 Points
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
Errors [Close]

#0 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 217> for benchmark 9, setting:2276 +0s ... 0.09s

#1 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 49>45.52 for benchmark 6, setting:2242 +0s ... 0.093s

#2 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 120>94.7 for benchmark 7, setting:2243 +0s ... 0.098s

#3 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1719> for benchmark 13, setting:2280 +0s ... 0.111s

#4 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1551> for benchmark 14, setting:2281 +0s ... 0.113s

#5 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 6075> for benchmark 15, setting:18 +0s ... 0.115s

log 19. 05:36:40

#0 checking url part for id 437 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 170 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 349 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 437 +0.002s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 437 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 170 +0.002s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 170 +0.053s ... 0.066s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 349 +0.002s ... 0.069s

#12 got single benchmarks 349 +0.008s ... 0.076s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.076s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.08s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.083s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.086s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.089s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.09s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.092s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.095s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.098s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.1s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.103s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.104s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.105s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.107s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.109s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.11s

#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.111s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.113s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.115s

#32 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.117s

#33 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.119s

#34 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.119s

#35 return log +0s ... 0.119s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)