Notebookcheck Logo

AMD E-240 vs AMD E-450

AMD E-240

► remove from comparison

Der AMD E-240 (Codename Zacate) ist ein Einzelkern-Prozessor mit integrierter Grafikkarte und Speicherkontroller (Single Channel DDR3-1066) für kleine Notebooks und Netbooks. Er ist gedacht als direkte Konkurrenz zu den Intel Atom Prozessoren (z.B. Atom N475).

Der E-240 basiert auf den E-350 Doppelkernprozessor, jedoch mit nur einem aktivierten Kern. Dieser Bobcat Kern bietet 512KB Level 2 Cache und im Gegensatz zu derzeitigen Atom Cores "out-of-order" Ausführung. Dadurch ist die CPU bei gleicher MHz und Taktfrequenz schneller als ein Pinetrail Atom (z.B. als der Atom N455). Die Leistung reicht jedoch nicht an gleichgetaktete Penryn Celerons Einzelkern oder AMD V-Series Prozessoren.  

Eine Besonderheit ist die integrierte Radeon HD 6310 Grafikkarte, welche dank 80 Shader und UVD3 Video Prozessor deutlich leistungsstärker ist als die Intel GMA 3150 in Atom Prozessoren. Die (Mobility) Radeon HD6310 sollte in etwas das Niveau einer ION Grafik erreichen.

Der Stromverbrauch ist mit einem TDP von 18 Watt deutlich über Atom und Arrandale ULV Prozessoren eingeordnet. Die verbaute Grafikkarte im E240 ist jedoch auch deutlich leistungsfähiger.

AMD E-450

► remove from comparison

Der AMD E-450 (Codename Zacate) ist ein Dual-Core Prozessor mit integrierter Grafikkarte und Speichercontroller (Single Channel DDR3-1333) für kleine Notebooks und Netbooks. Er ist gedacht als direkte Konkurrenz zu den Intel Atom Prozessoren (z.B. Atom N550). Im Vergleich zum Vorgänger, dem E-350, ist er um nur 50 MHz höher getaktet, bietet aber eine dank Turbo Core Übertaktung schnellere Grafikkarte.

Im Vergleich zum E-350 bietet der E-450 laut AMD nun außerdem Unterstützung für DDR3-1333 und HDMI 1.4a.

Die beiden Bobcat Kerne bieten jeweils 512 KB Level 2 Cache und im Gegensatz zu derzeitigen Atom Cores "out-of-order" Ausführung. Dadurch ist die CPU bei gleicher Taktfrequenz schneller als ein Pinetrail Atom (z.B. als der etwas langsamer getaktete Atom N550 Dual Core). Die Leistung reicht jedoch nicht an gleichgetaktete Penryn Celerons oder Danube Athlons heran. Im Schnitt ist der E-350 z.B. etwas langsamer als ein Celeron SU2300 mit 1.2 GHz bzw. Athlon II Neo K325 mit 1.3 GHz.

Eine Besonderheit ist die integrierte Radeon HD 6320 Grafikkarte, welche dank 80 Shader und UVD3 Video Prozessor deutlich leistungsstärker ist als die Intel GMA 3150 in Atom Prozessoren. Die (Mobility) Radeon HD 6320 sollte in etwas das Niveau einer ION Grafik erreichen.

Der Stromverbrauch liegt mit einer TDP von 18 Watt deutlich über Atom und auf dem Niveau von Sandy Bridge ULV-Prozessoren (17 Watt). Die verbaute Grafikkarte im E450 ist jedoch auch deutlich leistungsfähiger. Erste Strommessungen einer Brazos Prototypen Plattform zeigen Stromverbrauchswerte von 11-29 Watt und dadurch im Bereich eines MacBook Air 11" unter Windows 7 (welches jedoch deutlich leistungsfähiger ist).

ModelAMD E-240AMD E-450
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
CodenameZacateZacate
Serie: E-Series Zacate
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-350 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1200 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-350 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1200 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1
Clock1500 MHz1650 MHz
L1 Cache64 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 12 / 2
TDP18 Watt18 Watt
Technology40 nm40 nm
Die Size75 mm275 mm2
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-Ball
FeaturesMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
Architecturex86x86
Announced

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
0.3 Points (0%)
min: 0.55     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.64 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.31     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (1%)     max: 0.33 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 891     avg: 938     median: 937.5 (8%)     max: 984 Points
min: 665     avg: 1013     median: 1062.5 (9%)     max: 1077 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 1568     avg: 1961     median: 2020.5 (3%)     max: 2082 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 1968     avg: 2204     median: 2216.5 (2%)     max: 2299 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 988     avg: 1016     median: 1015.5 (6%)     max: 1043 Points
min: 1011     avg: 1137     median: 1170.5 (7%)     max: 1180 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
4472 s (53%)
min: 2006     avg: 2017     median: 2021 (24%)     max: 2025 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
137.4 s (28%)
min: 62     avg: 65.2     median: 64.5 (13%)     max: 69.6 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 485     avg: 491     median: 489 (3%)     max: 499 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 E-450 +
2.9 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 E-450 +
16.2 fps (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.05     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (2%)     max: 0.0511 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.072     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (2%)     max: 0.0747 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.0889     avg: 0.4     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.94 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 497     avg: 501     median: 500.5 (1%)     max: 504 Points
min: 1004     avg: 1030     median: 1034.5 (2%)     max: 1070 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
57.5 s (12%)
min: 47     avg: 47.7     median: 47.5 (10%)     max: 48.69 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
120.3 s (5%)
min: 105     avg: 107.1     median: 107.4 (5%)     max: 109 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 2334     avg: 2364     median: 2369 (11%)     max: 2384 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 3750     avg: 4097     median: 4270 (2%)     max: 4270 MIPS
9480 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 3520     avg: 3730     median: 3520 (3%)     max: 4150 MFLOPS
7530 MFLOPS (6%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 E-450 +
3310 Points (21%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
2.5 Points (32%)
min: 3.8     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (50%)     max: 3.9 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 1625     avg: 1864     median: 1892 (2%)     max: 2123 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
269 Points (1%)
min: 587     avg: 681     median: 703 (2%)     max: 721 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD E-240 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks AMD E-450 → 168% n=12

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 13. 02:36:58

#0 checking url part for id 1511 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2852 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:13:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.003s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 1511 +0s ... 0.008s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 got single benchmarks 1511 +0.008s ... 0.017s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 2852 +0s ... 0.018s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.018s

#21 got single benchmarks 2852 +0.022s ... 0.04s

#22 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.04s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.042s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.054s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.056s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#118 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.057s

#119 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.058s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#148 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.06s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.024s ... 0.084s

#150 return log +0.004s ... 0.088s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)