Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
Ausstattung / Datenblatt

Secondary Camera: 16 MPix
Preisvergleich
Durchschnitt von 3 Bewertungen (aus 9 Tests)
Testberichte für das Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
Quelle: 91mobiles
EN→DESo, is the OPPO K13 Turbo 5G the right phone for you? It really depends on what you’re looking for. The phone starts at Rs 27,999 for the 8GB+128GB model and goes up to Rs 29,999 for the 256GB storage variant, placing it in a very competitive bracket. Its most direct rival is another performance-focused device, the iQOO Neo 10R (review). While the iQOO also offers great gaming capabilities, it can’t match the K13 Turbo’s massive battery, and its software feels somewhat underwhelming compared to OPPO’s feature-rich ColorOS. On the other side, you have an excellent all-rounder like the Motorola Edge 60 Pro (review). The Moto performs surprisingly well across the board. It features a more versatile camera, a sleek design, and clean software, but its curved display isn’t ideal for gaming, and its battery life is suboptimal for heavy usage.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.09.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 89% Bildschirm: 81% Mobilität: 84% Gehäuse: 78%
Quelle: The Indian Express
EN→DEWith the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro, it looks like the company is catering to a really small smartphone segment – gamers. For normal users, the phone won’t make any sense since there are better alternatives out there with better cameras and more OS updates, but if you are a mobile gamer who wants a phone that can easily outlast your long gaming sessions and does not heat up, the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro is definitely a solid choice. If the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro offered more OS updates and an ultrawide shooter, this would be the gaming phone I would buy and stick with for years to come. But if you can look past these downsides, then this is a great gaming device by 2025 standards.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.09.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Think Digit
EN→DEThe Oppo K13 Turbo Pro aims to wow with its Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset, massive 7,000mAh battery, and built-in cooling fan. Performance is solid and consistent, though the fan doesn’t play a game-changer role. The 6.8-inch AMOLED display is accurate, cameras reliable in daylight, and battery life impressive. Speaking of design, it is stylish, durable, and suits power users. Okay, so a ‘built-in cooling fan’ is the USP of this device. The Oppo K13 Turbo Pro takes a different approach to deliver performance to power users. Previously, in my reviews, I have talked about how delivering high power is not as important as maintaining the given power with consistency. These days, we see many smartphones, packed with some crazy powerful processors, but still throttle so much that they can’t utilise that power to its full potential.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 22.08.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75% Preis: 76% Leistung: 73% Gehäuse: 77%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets
EN→DEThat said, Oppo K13 Turbo and Oppo K13 Turbo Pro do seem to be interesting smartphones catering to two different price segments. The gaming-centric approach of the brand makes it interesting, as we already have players like Infinix and Poco leading the race in this segment. That said, it would be interesting to see whether Oppo can capture the attention of the Indian gaming community with its Turbo series.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 11.08.2025
Quelle: Igeekphone
EN→DEThe OPPO K13 Turbo Pro introduces active air cooling to the mid-range smartphone market, giving users access to thermal management technology typically reserved for higher-end devices. Through hands-on testing, the Snapdragon 8s Gen4 chipset in the K13 Turbo Pro delivers impressive results under high-temperature conditions. In Honor of Kings, the frame rate deviation remains at a minimal 0.1 FPS when running at full frames. Even in the more demanding Genshin Impact, the device maintains a consistent 60FPS, highlighting the effectiveness of its thermal tuning. What stands out further is its performance in extremely taxing titles like Honkai Impact 3rd, where the phone sustains an average of 54.7FPS. Despite heavy scene transitions and intensive effects rendering, there’s no frame drop or locking — a rare achievement for phones priced around 2,000 yuan.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 23.07.2025
Quelle: Unite4buy
PL→DEPositive: Large battery capacity; quick 80W charging; beautiful AMOLED display; great cameras; NFC module. Negative: Plastic case; mono speakers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.07.2025
Quelle: Vat Vo Studio
VN→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 04.08.2025
Quelle: Vat Vo Studio
VN→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.08.2025
Quelle: Vat Vo Studio
VN→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.07.2025
Kommentar
Qualcomm Adreno 825: Eine integrierte Grafikkarte, die im April 2025 zusammen mit dem Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vorgestellt wurde.
Diese Klasse ist noch durchaus fähig neueste Spiele flüssig darzustellen, nur nicht mehr mit allen Details und in hohen Auflösungen. Besonders anspruchsvolle Spiele laufen nur in minimalen Detailstufen, wodurch die grafische Qualität oft deutlich leidet. Diese Klasse ist nur noch für Gelegenheitsspieler empfehlenswert. Der Stromverbrauch von modernen Grafikkarten in dieser Klasse ist dafür geringer und erlaubt auch bessere Akkulaufzeiten.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
SD 8s Gen 4:
Der Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (SM8735) ist ein High-End-SoC (System-on-a-Chip), welches in Oberklasse-Smartphones und -Tablets zum Einsatz kommt.
Der Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 ist offiziell die günstigere Alternative zum Snapdragon 8 Elite und soll bis zu 49 Prozent schneller sein als sein Vorgänger Snapdragon 8s Gen 3.
Der 4-nm-Chip besteht aus vier Clustern: Der erste besteht aus einem Prime-Core (Cortex X4) mit bis zu 3,2 GHz, der zweite aus drei Leistungskernen mit bis zu 3,0 GHz (Cortex A720). Der Effizienzcluster besteht aus vier Stromspareinheiten (Cortex A720), von denen zwei mit bis zu 2,8 GHz arbeiten, während zwei weitere mit bis zu 2,0 GHz takten.
» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .