Xiaomi Poco F7
Ausstattung / Datenblatt

Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (OmniVision OV20B, f/2.2), video recording up to 1080p@60fps
Preisvergleich
Durchschnitt von 43 Bewertungen (aus 70 Tests)
Testberichte für das Xiaomi Poco F7
Schon wieder so ein „Flaggschiff-Killer“? Das Xiaomi Poco F7 darf sich zu Recht so nennen, wie wir finden. Für unter 400 Euro bietet der 6,83-Zöller Highlights wie ein sehr helles AMOLED-Panel, ein wasserdichtes Gehäuse aus Metall und Glas, eine Oberklasse-Leistung und einen ungewöhnlich großen Akku mit 90-Watt-Schnellladen. Welche Ausstattung Xiaomi eingespart hat, zeigt unser Test ebenfalls.
Quelle: Computerbild

Das Poco F7 ist ein großes, starkes Smartphone mit sensationeller Ausdauer. Dank des schnellen Qualcomm-Prozessors werden hier auch gehobene (Zocker-)Ansprüche befriedigt. Die Glasrückseite ist leider glatt, aber die Verarbeitung wirkt nicht zuletzt dank des Aluminiumrahmens hochwertig. Ein paar Zugeständnisse müssen Sie bei der Kamera machen, die zwar Standardaufgaben gut erfüllt, aber bei ganz dichten oder weit entfernten Motiven an Grenzen kommt. Aber nicht nur unter 400 Euro bietet das Poco F7 ein tolles Paket!
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.09.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 96%
Quelle: PC Games Hardware

Das Poco F7 hinterlässt in unserem Test einen ziemlich positiven Eindruck. Gerade das Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis überzeugt uns. Das OLED-Display ist sehr hell, die Systemleistung hoch. Die Hauptkamera ist ziemlich solide, gerade in Bezug auf die Detailschärfe bei Nahaufnahmen. Auffällig ist außerdem die sehr hohe Akkulaufzeit und die erstklassige Verarbeitung. In dieser Hinsicht hat das Gerät tatsächlich gar keine Schwächen. Einzig bei der Ultraweitwinkel- und Selfie-Kamera können wir Kritik anbringen, ebenso bei Videoaufnahmen.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 02.08.2025
Quelle: ChinaMobileMag

Insgesamt hat sich das Poco F7 im Alltagseinsatz als recht gutes Gesamtpaket entpuppt. Bei der Kaufentscheidung sollte man sich jedoch genau überlegen, was man braucht.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.08.2025
Quelle: WinFuture

Das Poco F7 zählt aktuell zu den interessantesten Smartphones im Preisbereich um 400 Euro. Ausgestattet mit dem neuen Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 Prozessor bietet es eine Leistung, die sich kaum hinter den Flaggschiffen der letzten Generation verstecken muss.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.07.2025
Quelle: Heise

Das Poco F7 bietet Oberklasse-Leistung zum Mittelklasse-Preis. Mit dem neuen Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 erreicht das Gerät eine Performance, die nur knapp hinter aktuellen Flaggschiff-Chips liegt. Dazu kommen ein großes, strahlend helles 6,8-Zoll-OLED-Display sowie ein ausdauernder 6500-mAh-Akku auf Silizium-Kohlenstoff-Basis, der trotz hoher Kapazität ein vergleichsweise schlankes Gehäuse ermöglicht. Abstriche gibt es bei der Kameraausstattung: Eine Telelinse fehlt, und bei schwachem Licht nimmt die Bildqualität spürbar ab. Außerdem wird das Gerät unter Last ziemlich heiß und wirkt mit seinem breiten Gehäuse recht klobig. Wer jedoch ein schnelles Android-Smartphone mit großem Display, hervorragender Akkulaufzeit und starker Systemleistung sucht – und dabei auf eine High-End-Kamera verzichten kann – findet im Poco F7 ein ausgesprochen attraktives Gesamtpaket.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.07.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Tablet Blog

Das Poco F7 ist ein Preis-Leistungs-Knaller. Es bietet viel Leistung, ein exzellentes Display und die mit Abstand beste Akkulaufzeit, die wir bisher gemessen haben – und das für 400 Euro.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.07.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Chip.de

Das Xiaomi Poco F7 überzeugt im Test mit einem brillanten OLED-Display, starker Leistung und einer exzellenten Akkulaufzeit. Für einen Einführungspreis von knapp unter 500 Euro liefert das Smartphone eine sehr gute Performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 97% Preis: 92% Leistung: 96% Ausstattung: 94% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 100%
Quelle: Gamestar

Schon das F7 Pro war in seiner Preisklasse quasi konkurrenzlos, das F7 setzt nun noch einen drauf – denn eigentlich ist es ein Pro-Modell zu einem günstigeren Preis.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Smartzone

Das Poco F7 erweist sich im Test als der erwartete Preis-Leistungs-Kracher und setzt neue Maßstäbe in der Smartphone-Mittelklasse. Das Herzstück ist ohne Zweifel der brandneue Snapdragon-Prozessor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 91% Leistung: 95% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 100%
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Phandroid
EN→DEStarting at around $500 (when converted), the POCO F7 goes up against other midrange devices like the Google Pixel 9a and Galaxy A56, for example. By comparison, the F7 comes with a more capable battery and performance, although there’s room for improvement in terms of software refinements and overall camera versatility. On the other hand, users who value raw power above all else will find a lot to love about the POCO F7 Pro, especially if they’re not too keen on spending too much for a new smartphone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.09.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets
EN→DEThe Poco F7 is able to uphold the legacy of the F-series by offering a great value-for-money proposition to customers. The smartphone comes with a gaming-centric design, which looks completely unique compared to its predecessors. The display looks good, and you will definitely have a good experience while playing those intense battle royale games or bingeing your favourite shows or movies. Moreover, it is a powerhouse performer that provides stable 90FPS gameplay in BGMI, along with solid and fluid day-to-day performance. The battery life is yet another strong suit of the device, and you can get up to 2 days' worth of battery life with moderate usage. That said, just like the rest, it is not a perfect smartphone. You still need to compromise on the cameras, smudges, and bloatware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.08.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Expert Reviews
EN→DEThere are a few areas in which the Xiaomi Poco F7 feels dangerously close to the cheaper X7 Pro – the cameras are identical, the display is roughly the same and even that excellent performance is matched across the board. So why spend more on the Poco F7 over the Poco X7 Pro? Two main reasons, and they both boil down to longevity. First of all, there’s that fantastic battery life. The X7 Pro underperformed in our testing, while the F7 is an overachiever, offering truly stamina at a highly affordable price. Throw in superior software support and the Poco F7 just about manages to justify being more expensive than its similar sibling. As for the rest of the competition, the Pixel 9a remains the best all-round mid-range phone you can buy – but it is quite a bit more expensive than the Poco F7.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.08.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Expert Reviews
EN→DEThere are a few areas in which the Xiaomi Poco F7 feels dangerously close to the cheaper X7 Pro – the cameras are identical, the display is roughly the same and even that excellent performance is matched across the board. So why spend more on the Poco F7 over the Poco X7 Pro? Two main reasons, and they both boil down to longevity. First of all, there’s that fantastic battery life. The X7 Pro underperformed in our testing, while the F7 is an overachiever, offering truly stamina at a highly affordable price. Throw in superior software support and the Poco F7 just about manages to justify being more expensive than its similar sibling. As for the rest of the competition, the Pixel 9a remains the best all-round mid-range phone you can buy – but it is quite a bit more expensive than the Poco F7. If your main concerns are performance and stamina, you can get everything you need at a dirt-cheap price with the bargain Poco F7.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.08.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Mezha EN
EN→DEThe POCO F7 supports 90W wired charging (Xiaomi's HyperCharge technology). When using a compatible adapter (unfortunately, purchased separately), the F7 charges very quickly. Xiaomi promises 80% in 30 minutes. A full cycle from 0 to 100% takes about 37 minutes with the screen off and maximum charging mode activated. The POCO F7 doesn't have wireless charging - this is one of the compromises the manufacturer made. However, there is a nice bonus: reverse wired charging with a capacity of 22.5 W is supported. That is, the POCO F7 can be used as a power bank and charge another smartphone or accessories from it. The POCO F7 can be recommended to those who are primarily looking for a fast platform, a large screen, and a high-capacity battery in a smartphone. In these parameters, it can really compete with more expensive models. However, if camera capabilities are important to you, this model has fairly basic shooting capabilities.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 06.08.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Techlusive
EN→DEThe Poco F7 starts at Rs 31,999 for the 12GB RAM and 256GB storage variant and truly delivers great value for money. The device caters to the growing demand for performance-driven products at accessible prices and offers high-end performance at a price point that doesn’t hurt the wallet. What makes it even more appealing is the massive battery, which is ideal for users constantly juggling between apps, tasks, and long days without charging breaks. Whether you are gaming, binge-watching, or just handling daily multitasking, the Poco F7 keeps up without breaking a sweat. It honestly feels like a dream device for anyone chasing top-tier performance and a smooth experience without the premium price tag. So, for those looking for a phone that delivers the best raw performance, excellent battery life, premium design, and a vibrant display, the Poco F7 is easily one of the most compelling options in its category.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.07.2025
Quelle: Yugatech

Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.07.2025
Quelle: GSM Arena

Poco F7 or F7 Pro? Both pack flagship power, but the F7 gives you a bigger screen and battery, while the Pro counters with a sharper 1440p display and potentially, faster performance. Tough call? Check out this HEAD-TO-HEAD for the COMPLETE BREAKDOWN of how these two phones compare in terms of screen quality, battery life and charging speed, chipset performance, and camera image quality, all based on our extensive reviews.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.07.2025
Quelle: Tech PP
EN→DELike the iQOO Neo 10, the Poco F7 is literally a budget flagship with a premium mid-segment price tag. And like it, it comes with a striking design on top of some very powerful hardware. The combination of eye-catching design, large display, large battery, and close to flagship processor makes it one of the best (if not THE best) options for any person who wants a high-performance phone on a relatively tight budget. Those fanatical about camera performance might prefer the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro or be tempted to spend a little more and get the Vivo T4 Ultra, but those devices are far behind the Poco F7 in critical performance departments like processor and battery life.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.07.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Preis: 100% Leistung: 100% Gehäuse: 100%
Quelle: Techradar
EN→DEThe Poco F7 provides unusually speedy performance for a sub-£400 phone, not to mention excellent build quality and superb stamina. However, its software continues to underwhelm, and the camera doesn’t offer anything to get excited about. It’s a strong mid-range option for power users and gamers on a budget, but it has its limitations.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.07.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 90% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Mobile Syrup
EN→DEThe Poco F7 (2025) is a remarkable mid-range device. It delivers outstanding performance, beautiful visuals and long battery life. However, it’s not for everyone. The restrictive software will deter Android purists or power users who value flexibility. Also, the issues with camera zoom should keep any serious photography enthusiasts away.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.07.2025
Quelle: Yugatech

Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.07.2025
Quelle: Think Digit
EN→DEThe Poco F7 is all about raw power. It is built like a tank, runs like a flagship, and lasts forever. Sure, the camera is not its strongest suit, but if gaming, performance, and battery are what matter to you, this one is a total no-brainer at Rs 31,999. Just three years back, if I had told you there is a phone priced at Rs 31,999 that packs a 7550mAh battery, is powerful enough to rival flagships, and comes wrapped in a rugged yet eye-catching design, would you have believed me? Probably not. But wait, by now, you must be wondering why I have listed all the key specs and haven’t even mentioned the camera once? Well, that pretty much sums up the story of our new favourite performance mid-ranger, the Poco F7. I have been using the successor to the Poco F6 for a week now, and I think it’s finally time to tell you everything about it. So here goes my review of the Poco F7.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.07.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 79% Leistung: 80% Gehäuse: 81%
Quelle: Business Standard
EN→DEAfter a really long time I came across a powerhouse smartphone that handles multitasking like a breeze, extensive gaming like its anything, casual photography with ease, features a massive battery and even comes with on-device AI tools. The POCO F7 to me is a power packed smartphone that really exceeded my expectations. The aspects where I felt that the POCO F7 didn’t meet my expectations was in audio and heating. POCO has indeed compromised on audio in order to deliver the rest of the things and it is quite noticeable. The heating issue is there but for the performance that it delivers, I think we will have to make peace with it. To be fair, I have used phones that get far more heated than the POCO F7 but it seems like my expectations with the “All chill. No sweat,” claim of POCO was slightly misplaced.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 02.07.2025
Quelle: Trusted Reviews
EN→DEUltimately, I’d argue that, given the price difference, especially with early bird pricing of £319, the Poco F7 presents a more compelling purchasing option than the F7 Pro. It’s cheaper, virtually matches the Pro for performance and speed, and has a bigger, longer-lasting battery. If you don’t care too much about camera quality, it’ll give you a great all-round experience. And it’ll cost you less. Considering what the big-name manufacturers charge for their mid-range phones – phones like the Google Pixel 9a, Samsung Galaxy A56 and iPhone 16E – they don’t seem quite as good value for money for anything other than maybe the cameras and software.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Android Guys
EN→DEThe POCO F7 is a terrific example of how to build a phone around strengths. It knows what it’s good at and doesn’t pretend to be other things. It leans in the direction of performance, display quality, and battery life and doesn’t position itself around some flagship-level camera or next-level software capabilities. Awarded to products with an average rating of 3.75 stars or higher, the AndroidGuys Smart Pick recognizes a balance of quality, performance, and value. It stands out in design, innovation, and user experience, delivering great functionality at a competitive price. If you’re the type who wants max horsepower under $400, this is one of the best values you’ll find in 2025. You get premium build quality, a flagship-worthy display, true gaming chops, and software support that rivals some of the best.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Preis: 90% Leistung: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Exhibit.tech
EN→DEThe POCO F7 is an impressive budget flagship that offers excellent performance and battery life, highlighted by a 7550mAh battery for exceptional endurance. Powered by the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset, it delivers near-flagship performance, particularly for gaming and multitasking. The 6.83-inch AMOLED display is vibrant, and the IP68 rating enhances durability. However, its camera system is a downside, featuring mediocre ultrawide and selfie cameras and lacking a telephoto lens. Priced around ₹31999, it competes well with higher-end models like the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and OnePlus 13R. While it may not match the camera quality of its rivals, the POCO F7 is an excellent choice for power users and gamers on a budget.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 26.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Leistung: 90% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Android Central
EN→DEThe F7 is an existential threat to the Redmi Note 14 Pro+; POCO somehow managed to deliver better performance, much better battery life, a bigger AMOLED panel with brighter colors, and longer software updates. This makes me question why Xiaomi even bothers with the Redmi Note series; sure, it takes better photos, but it is inferior in every other way, and the pricing just doesn't justify what you're getting. If you need a mid-range phone and don't mind average cameras, there really isn't a better choice than the F7 right now.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Stuff TV
EN→DEThe F7 launches into a hugely crowded market with lots of contenders under that all-important $400/£400 segment that classifies something as a budget phone rather than a mid-ranger. There are several reasons the Poco F7 is an absolute cracker. Battery capacity has to be chief among them (even if the real-world results currently underwhelm), alongside the 90W fast charge and supplied charger. Then there’s the excellent display that pushes the boundary of what you can expect from a phone at this price point. Finally, there’s the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 platform itself, which provides you with reliable everyday performance. On the negative side, the camera can’t offer the quality that a bit more cash can get you and others do better for not much more.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tech Spurt

The POCO F7 should suit most users just fine, offering strong value for money. Sure you don't get the Ultra's telephoto lens, but the camera tech is still decent, while you can once again get gaming on Wuthering Waves. However, unlike the POCO F7 Pro and Ultra, the regular model does get quite toasty with games. Battery life is sublime on all three, and in fact the vanilla phone is better with its upgraded capacity. That said, it's still the POCO F7 Ultra that offers the fastest charging and wireless support. You've got a gorgeous AMOLED screen with HDR10 and Dolby Vision support in all three smartphones, although the more expensive models boast a boost to the resolution.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.06.2025
Quelle: ben's gadget reviews

The POCO F7 is an entry level phone priced starting at US$340, and it comes with the newest Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, along with a huge 6500 mAh battery and a 6.8-inch 120Hz OLED screen. There's a lot to like in terms of hardware, with the cameras being the only compromise.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.06.2025
Quelle: India Today
EN→DELook, the Poco F1 was an outlier. Very few phones have come to hold a cult status like that. Even fewer will get there, in the near and distant future, maybe. But that is okay. What matters is, if that legacy lives on, so people who want a phone like that – one that is both fast and furious without breaking the bank – can call upon a certain Poco – or iQOO, or OnePlus, what have you – and be rest assured, they have the option. Time changes everything. The same is true with smartphones in 2025. What was pure unbelievable excess in 2018 is what people expect, like clockwork, even take for granted, today. So, a phone brand must meet those requirements. Whether it can deliver on those expectations while keeping the legacy alive is the challenge.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Yanko Design
EN→DEThe Poco F7 stands out by blending flagship-grade performance, a vibrant and expansive display, and reliable battery stamina within a bold, modern design. Its powerful performance, massive display, big battery, and solid build make it a compelling choice for anyone seeking a premium experience without the typical flagship price tag. While there are a few minor drawbacks, such as the weight and some software quirks, the overall package is hard to beat in its segment. If you value speed, all-day power, and a futuristic look, the Poco F7 deserves your attention.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.06.2025
Bewertung: Preis: 90% Leistung: 80% Ergonomie: 70%
Quelle: Yugatech
EN→DEThe POCO F7 usually goes for PHP 23,999 for the 256GB version and PHP 25,999 for the 512GB. There is currently a Shopee-exclusive promo which brings the prices down to PHP 17,499 and PHP 19,499 that users can grab in Shopee 15. To wrap things up, the POCO F7 does live up to the company’s reputation of offering budget-friendly devices that punch above their weight class. To recap, this F-series model comes with a design change, some upgrades, and still comes with a ton of value-for-money.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.06.2025
Quelle: Phone Arena
EN→DEThe Poco F7 slots nicely in the F7 series lineup. It offers snappy and fast performance thanks to the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, a gorgeous and very bright 6.83-inch screen, and a main camera that gets the job done. On the other hand, some corners have been cut to achieve the starting price of $399 ($339 with an early bird deal). There's no wireless charging on board, the ultrawide camera and overall video quality are lacking, and the battery life is unimpressive given the huge battery. At the end of the day, the Poco F7 will have to go against phones such as the Pixel 9a and Galaxy A56, as well as its own kin in the face of the Poco F7 Pro and Poco F7 Ultra. It's cheaper than all of the above and gets the basics right, so if you don't mind the aforementioned cons, you can get a lot out of this guy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 65% Leistung: 72% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 72% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Tech Advisor
EN→DEIf you’re looking for a sub-£400 phone that can handle some serious gaming, the Poco F7 is hard to beat. It performs on par with some of the most powerful flagships from last year, while delivering a stunning screen, massive battery, quick charging and a standout design. It’s only the camera system that falls slightly behind some of its similarly priced competition. That’s not to say the cameras are bad – they’re actually very capable – but without a dedicated telephoto, the system is less versatile than some of the competition.Of course, at this price, you can’t have everything, and Poco has clearly prioritised performance. However, unlike dedicated gaming handsets, the spec sheet is nicely balanced, and you don’t have to make many concessions elsewhere.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Yugatech

Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.06.2025
Quelle: Cashify
EN→DEI was using Poco F7 for review for the last ten days, and I can say this is a mind-blowing phone if I skip the heating issue. This phone has a giant display, making to perfect for students to do online classes or watch movies. This phone also has a Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4 nm), offering daily performance. The camera quality is generally good under different conditions, although the front camera could be improved. One of the main selling points of this phone is its impressive 7,550 mAh battery capacity, making it one of the largest in the Indian market. Additionally, it supports 90W fast charging. During the stress test, its temperature reached 53 degrees Celsius, which is concerning. Overall, there are several phones in the market with the same price, such as the Vivo T4 Ultra, iQOO Neo 10, Motorola Edge 60 Pro, Xiaomi 14 Civi, Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, etc. You can compare the Poco F7 with these phones before buy. I hope you liked my Poco F7 review. Thanks for reading.Smartphone deals
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.06.2025
Quelle: GSM Arena
EN→DEThe Poco F7 lives up to the F-series legacy with yet another well-balanced, performance-first offering that's hard to ignore. It may not break new ground in terms of innovation, but it nails the essentials that make a phone stand out in the crowded $400 segment. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset delivers excellent overall performance, whether gaming or just navigating the UI. In fact, the Poco F7 might just be the next budget performance king, thermal concerns aside. The display is another undeniable highlight. The large, 120Hz AMOLED panel is vibrant, bright, and color-accurate, with Dolby Vision support and a peak auto brightness of over 1,500 nits. Paired with strong battery life from the 6,500 mAh cell and 90W fast charging (charger in the box, thankfully), the Poco F7 is well-equipped for long, intensive usage without compromise. Build quality is also surprisingly premium, with a metal frame and IP68 ingress protection rounding out a robust package.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86%
Quelle: TechTablets

Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.06.2025
Quelle: Tech Spurt

This is yet another quality Xiaomi mid-range smartphone boasting some of the best battery life of 2025. Gaming performance is respectable on the POCO F7 although the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 does heat up under a bit of pressure, when playing Wuthering Waves. Likewise, Xiaomi's HyperOS isn't for everyone and features like eSIM support are missing. However, for a budget-friendly mid-range price in the UK, Xiaomi's POCO F7 has a lot going for it. That AMOLED screen is a stunner and the design is an improvement on the Pro and Ultra, I reckon. Just go for the white rather than silver limited edition model if you hate fingerprints. The POCO F7's camera setup is limited, especially vs the Ultra or the Nothing Phone 3a duo. No telephoto zoom, just a basic ultra-wide shooter, that's it. All the same, you'll get good looking photos in most conditions, especially if you take your time and grab a couple of snaps just in case.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.06.2025
Quelle: CG Mag Online
EN→DEThe POCO F7 is a next-level budget phone—and it would have every right to be offended if you called it that. It delivers pro-level performance without punishing your wallet. If you’re buying top-tier brands without needing everything they offer, you might be doing yourself a disservice.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 24.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 95%
Quelle: TechTablets

Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.06.2025
Quelle: Computerhoy
ES→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 15.07.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87%
Quelle: Xataka
ES→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 30.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76% Leistung: 75% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Hipertextual
ES→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tudo Celular
PT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.10.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 70%
Quelle: Smart World
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.08.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81% Preis: 75% Ausstattung: 90% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 04.08.2025
Quelle: Tutto Android
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.07.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 22.07.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 85% Bildschirm: 86% Mobilität: 96% Gehäuse: 79%
Quelle: HDblog.it
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.07.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 72% Ausstattung: 84%
Quelle: Multiplayer IT
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 11.07.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Evo smart
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.07.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Preis: 80% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90%
Quelle: Everyeye.it
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79%
Quelle: 01Net
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 31.07.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Preis: 90% Mobilität: 100%
Quelle: Clubic
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 31.07.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Co Nowego
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 04.09.2025
Quelle: GSM Maniak
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 88% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 90%
Quelle: GSM Maniak
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Leistung: 92% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 92%
Quelle: GSM Online PL
PL→DEPositive: High performance; large battery capacity; quick 90W charging; bright 120Hz display; premium design; good main camera. Negative: Easy getting dirts; poor secondary camera; unsupported eSIM.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.06.2025
Quelle: Android.com.pl
PL→DEPositive: High performance; bright AMOLED display; modern design; large battery capacity; slim size; light weight; modern design; great speakers; smart AI Features. Negative: No charger included; unsupported wireless charging; average cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.06.2025
Quelle: Instalki
PL→DEPositive: Elegant design; high performance; great display; good connectivity; excellent battery life; quick charging; nice main camera. Negative: Unsupported eSIM; overheats while using; many bloatwares.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.06.2025
Quelle: ITC UA
RU→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.08.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 95% Gehäuse: 90% Ergonomie: 90%
Quelle: MobilArena HU
HU→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 10.10.2025
Bewertung: Preis: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 100%
Quelle: Smartmania.cz
CZ→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.08.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Leistung: 85% Ausstattung: 88% Mobilität: 93% Gehäuse: 89%
Quelle: XT Mobile
VN→DEPositive: Affordable price; beautiful design; impressive display; good autonomy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 25.06.2025
Quelle: Selular
ID→DEPositive: Decent hardware; big screen; beautiful display; great cameras; attractive price. Negative: Inflexible AI Features; average gaming performance.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.06.2025
Quelle: Mobile-com JP
JA→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 19.08.2025
Bewertung: Leistung: 100% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 80%
Kommentar
Qualcomm Adreno 825: Eine integrierte Grafikkarte, die im April 2025 zusammen mit dem Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vorgestellt wurde.
Diese Klasse ist noch durchaus fähig neueste Spiele flüssig darzustellen, nur nicht mehr mit allen Details und in hohen Auflösungen. Besonders anspruchsvolle Spiele laufen nur in minimalen Detailstufen, wodurch die grafische Qualität oft deutlich leidet. Diese Klasse ist nur noch für Gelegenheitsspieler empfehlenswert. Der Stromverbrauch von modernen Grafikkarten in dieser Klasse ist dafür geringer und erlaubt auch bessere Akkulaufzeiten.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
SD 8s Gen 4:
Der Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (SM8735) ist ein High-End-SoC (System-on-a-Chip), welches in Oberklasse-Smartphones und -Tablets zum Einsatz kommt.
Der Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 ist offiziell die günstigere Alternative zum Snapdragon 8 Elite und soll bis zu 49 Prozent schneller sein als sein Vorgänger Snapdragon 8s Gen 3.
Der 4-nm-Chip besteht aus vier Clustern: Der erste besteht aus einem Prime-Core (Cortex X4) mit bis zu 3,2 GHz, der zweite aus drei Leistungskernen mit bis zu 3,0 GHz (Cortex A720). Der Effizienzcluster besteht aus vier Stromspareinheiten (Cortex A720), von denen zwei mit bis zu 2,8 GHz arbeiten, während zwei weitere mit bis zu 2,0 GHz takten.
» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .