Realme 12
Ausstattung / Datenblatt

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, 26mm
Preisvergleich
Durchschnitt von 17 Bewertungen (aus 41 Tests)
Testberichte für das Realme 12
Quelle: Root Nation
EN→DEHigh photo quality, long battery life, fast charging, and an interesting design make the realme 12 5G a good choice for those seeking an efficient and affordable smartphone. It's unfortunate that it lacks AMOLED, a wide-angle sensor, and comes with a lot of unnecessary software, but for its price, it performs very well!
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 80% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Speed Magazine
EN→DEIf you’ve been wanting to get the realme 12+ or Pro variants but are strapped for cash, then the recently launched realme 12 5G is the device worth checking out. Just like its premium siblings, the midrange smartphone has a captivating design inspired by luxury watches and a 6.72-inch display that provides users with a pleasurable viewing experience. Not only that, its MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ chipset allows the device to perform with minimal lags. While its camera and battery may not be as remarkable as its pricier siblings, the device is still a decent all-rounder, especially for its price of just P14,999. The realme 12 5G available in realme stores and online via Shopee, Lazada, and TikTok Shop.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.04.2024
Quelle: Yugatech
EN→DEOverall, the realme 12 5G does not really shine, especially when you compare it to the 12+ and the 12 Pro+. It’s a bit down on specs and performance, but it does have one advantage – the price. Compared to the other two, the realme 12 is the most affordable out of the bunch. The realme 12 in the 8+256GB configuration retails for just PHP 14,999. This makes it PHP 3,000 more affordable than the 12+. Still, the question remains – is it a phone you should get? If you’re a bit tight on budget, you won’t be disappointed with the realme 12 5G. You have a relatively powerful chipset that can handle graphic-intensive titles along with your day-to-day tasks. You also get a decent camera and a relatively long battery life all for the price of just PHP 14,999. But if you have the budget or don’t mind saving up a bit, I would recommend going for the realme 12 Pro+. It has one of the best cameras in its class, a better display, and a very capable chipset.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.04.2024
Quelle: News Bytes
EN→DEOverall, we see the realme 12 5G as a strong contender in the mid-range market, offering a well-rounded package at a competitive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.04.2024
Quelle: Yugatech

If you were wondering where the realme 12 BASE MODEL was last time; Well it just officially launched in the Philippines TODAY. Check it out in our review!
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 25.04.2024
Quelle: News Bytes
EN→DEThere’s a reason why realme is the second-biggest, if not the top-selling, smartphone brand in the Philippines. Somehow, it has been able to hit that sweet spot between innovativeness and affordability. With the new realme 12 5G, it is again carrying on with this strategy. And while its price has not been revealed yet, we know that it will not veer away from the price point we’ve come to expect from realme.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 21.04.2024
Quelle: Speed Magazine
EN→DErealme is set to release another variant to its 12 series, and if you’re scouting around for a compelling midrange smartphone, then you’ve come to the right place. The realme 12 5G is slated for launch in the Philippines after first being unveiled in India last March. Built as the more affordable variant in the realme 12 series, the smartphone boasts appealing aesthetics similar to the more premium realme 12+ and Pro variants. Its stunning design is just for starters, though. The realme 12 has other features that make it a competitive all-around smartphone in the mid-level price range. You’ll get a peek at that below, as we unbox the smartphone ahead of its launch on April 25.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.04.2024
Quelle: 91mobiles
EN→DEWhen compared with its competitors, the Realme 12 loses out to the Redmi Note 13 (review), which packs an AMOLED display with higher peak brightness and a better chipset for gaming needs. The Infinix Note 30 (review), though slightly dated now, boasts a JBL-powered speaker, ensuring crisp audio quality. The Realme smartphone, in contrast, offers a sleek design. Its performance is also satisfactory for most daily activities, and the cameras excel in daylight. Furthermore, its battery life aligns well with its performance, offering long-lasting backup, making the Realme 12 a viable choice for those prioritising endurance over other features.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.04.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75% Leistung: 75% Bildschirm: 75% Mobilität: 75% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Cashify
EN→DEThe Realme 12 5G offers a great blend of style and substance with its watch-inspired design and excellent cameras. It features a large 6.67-inch FHD+ display with a 120Hz refresh rate, excellent cameras and long-lasting battery life. However, you will need to contend with a plastic build, LCD display and pre-installed apps. If cameras and design are your priorities, look no further than the Realme 12 5G in this segment. Otherwise, phones like the Lava Curve 5G, Samsung Galaxy F15 5G, and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 offer much better specifications at a similar price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 07.03.2024
Quelle: Computerhoy
ES→DEPositive: Excellent design; quick charging; beautiful display. Negative: Overheats while using.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.05.2024
Quelle: Tudo Celular
PT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 18.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 60%
Quelle: Canaltech
PT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 04.06.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 74% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Techzilla.it
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.08.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Preis: 70% Bildschirm: 65% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Tutto Android
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Smart World
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79% Preis: 70% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Smart World
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 79% Preis: 70% Ausstattung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Batista70Phone
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 15.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75% Ausstattung: 75% Bildschirm: 75% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Evo smart
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 15.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 66% Preis: 50% Leistung: 60% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 80%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 62% Preis: 65% Bildschirm: 65% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 75%
Quelle: Techprincess IT
IT→DEPositive: Affordable price; decent performance; long battery life; beautiful design. Negative: Poor cameras in low light condition.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.05.2024
Quelle: Top for Phone
FR→DEPositive: Decent hardware; good price; quick 45W charging. Negative: Unsupported NFC module; Wi-Fi 5; poor video recording.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 15.11.2024
Quelle: T3 PL
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75%
Quelle: Android.com.pl
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Mobileworld 24
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 71% Preis: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: Root Nation PL
PL→DEVergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 14.05.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Co Nowego
PL→DEPositive: Trendy design; high performance; long battery life; nice cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.07.2024
Quelle: GSM Online
PL→DEPositive: Affordable price; nice design; beautiful display; good cameras. Negative: Average performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 19.07.2024
Quelle: Techno Senior
PL→DEPositive: Fast 67W charging; large 512GB ROM; powerful processor; good price; nice AMOLED display; great cameras; long battery life; waterproof IP54; affordable price. Negative: No headphone jack; no wireless charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 19.07.2024
Quelle: Co Nowego
PL→DEPositive: Affordable price; nice performance; support 5G. Negative: Average cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.05.2024
Quelle: GSM Online
PL→DEPositive: Stereo speakers; attractive design; nice cameras. Negative: Slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 14.05.2024
Quelle: Instalki
PL→DEPositive: Elegant design; bright AMOLED display; waterproof IP54; quick charging; NFC module; support 5G; great cameras; stereo speakers. Negative: No charger included; average performance; many bloatwares.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.05.2024
Quelle: Unite4buy
PL→DEPositive: Good cameras; elegant design; nice display; decent hardware.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.03.2024
Quelle: Ferra.ru
RU→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: ITC UA
RU→DEVergleich, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.07.2024
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Preis: 65% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 75% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Mega Obzor
RU→DEPositive: Affordable price; high performance; decent cameras; long battery life; quick charging; bright display; large ROM; memory card slot; headphone jack; beautiful design. Negative: Poor video recording.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.07.2024
Quelle: Hi-Tech Mail
RU→DEPositive: Affordable price; quick charging; great AMOLED display; decent cameras; 512GB ROM. Negative: No ultra-wide angle camera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.07.2024
Quelle: The Gioididong
VN→DEPositive: Beautiful design; good price; powerful processor; compact size.
Hands-On, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.08.2024
Quelle: Selular
ID→DEPositive: Excellent cameras; high performance; stylish design; decent hardware; attractive price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.03.2024
Quelle: Root Nation CN
zh-CN→DEPositive: Attractive price; big screen; long battery life; attractive design. Negative: Poor display; average cameras; slow charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 20.06.2024
Quelle: Computerblog.ro
→DEPositive: Good price; affordable price; nice main camera; long battery life. Negative: Weak processor; poor selfie camera.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.05.2024
Kommentar
ARM Mali-G57 MP2: Integrierte Grafikkarte der Mittelklasse mit 2 Kernen / Clustern (MC2 oder MP2) basierend auf die Valhall Architektur.
Diese Karten können nur sehr alte und sehr anspruchslose 3D Spiele flüssig darstellen. Anwendungen wie Office, Internet surfen, Bildbearbeitung oder (SD) Videoschnitt sind jedoch ohne große Einschränkungen möglich.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
Dimensity 6100+: Der Dimensity 6100 Plus ist ein unterer Mittelklasse-Prozessor mit integriertem 5G Modem. Der CPU-Teil integriert zwei schnelle ARM Cortex-A76 Kerne mit bis zu 2,2 GHz und sechs Stromsparkerne vom Typ Cortex-A55 mit bis zu 2 GHz. Der 6100 ist technisch ähnlich zum älteren Dimensity 700 und fast identisch zum 6020.» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .