Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000 vs Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300

Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000

► remove from comparison

Der Core 2 Extreme X9000 war der damals schnellste Dual Core Prozessor mit 2.8 GHz und 6 MB Level 2 Cache. Er wurde später vom 3.06 GHz schnellen Core 2 Extreme X9100 abgelöst und besitzt wie dieser einen freien Multiplikator zur einfachen Übertaktung. Mit 44 Watt TDP ist der X9000 deutlich höher spezifiziert als andere CPUs der Core 2 Duo Serie (25-35W). Der modernere P9700 leistet z.B. ungefähr das Gleiche bei 25 Watt TDP.

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300

► remove from comparison

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Extreme X9000Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300
SeriesIntel Core 2 ExtremeIntel Core 2 Extreme
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Extreme Penryn
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX93002.53 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Core 2 Extreme X9100 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000 « 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300 « 2.53 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Core 2 Extreme X9100 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Extreme X90002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2800 MHz2530 MHz
FSB8001066
L1 Cache128 KB256 KB
L2 Cache6 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
TDP44 Watt45 Watt
Transistors410 Million820 Million
45 nm, 1.0-1.275V45 nm, 1.05-1.175V
Die Size107 mm2214 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketPGA478PGA478
FeaturesVirtualization, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitIntel VT-x, Enhanced SpeedStep, Intel 64, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$851 U.S.$1038 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 QX9300 +
2.6 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3070     avg: 3189     median: 3072 (19%)     max: 3425 Points
min: 2959     avg: 3131     median: 3113.5 (19%)     max: 3338 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5818     avg: 6084     median: 5843 (4%)     max: 6590 Points
min: 10716     avg: 10914     median: 10881.5 (8%)     max: 11176 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
29 s (6%)
15.7 s (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2532     avg: 2550     median: 2549 (5%)     max: 2570 Points
min: 3523     avg: 3750     median: 3780 (8%)     max: 3915 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 16     avg: 16.7     median: 16.8 (4%)     max: 17 s
18 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 40     avg: 40.1     median: 40 (2%)     max: 40.17 s
44 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1092     avg: 1115     median: 1115 (5%)     max: 1138 s
1159 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 22914     avg: 24345     median: 24344.5 (12%)     max: 25775 MIPS
46468 MIPS (22%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 18932     avg: 19711     median: 19711 (15%)     max: 20490 MFLOPS
34653 MFLOPS (27%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 7036     avg: 7392     median: 7470 (15%)     max: 7669 Points
min: 7792     avg: 8239     median: 8160 (17%)     max: 8764 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 X9000 +
5.6 Points (80%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
5613 Points (5%)
min: 10188     avg: 10370     median: 10339 (9%)     max: 10548 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300 → 136% n=11

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 26. 07:48:25

#0 checking url part for id 378 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 418 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.012s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.012s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 378 +0.004s ... 0.016s

#7 got single benchmarks 378 +0.018s ... 0.034s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 418 +0.003s ... 0.036s

#9 got single benchmarks 418 +0.027s ... 0.064s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.066s ... 0.13s

#12 return log +0.021s ... 0.151s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)