Asus VivoBook X202E-DH31T
Ausstattung / Datenblatt

Preisvergleich
Durchschnitt von 6 Bewertungen (aus 7 Tests)
Testberichte für das Asus VivoBook X202E-DH31T
Quelle: Tech Advisor
EN→DE Archive.org versionThe Asus VivoBook x202 is unique, in that it's the perfect notebook for a very specific demographic: the demographic that wants a small, portable, touchscreen laptop for a relatively cheap price. The VivoBook is just £459, which makes it about half the price of an Ultrabook or a MacBook Air. Since there aren't a ton of ultraportable options at this price point, the VivoBook does have a niche to fill. So, if you're looking for a notebook that you can pop into your purse--and you definitely don't want a tablet--the VivoBook might be worth a look.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 07.02.2013
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: Computer Shopper
EN→DE Archive.org versionThe VivoBook X202E certainly isn't without shortcomings. Those who frequently task their laptops with CPU-taxing workloads like video editing and bulk crunching of high-resolution still images should look for a system with a more powerful Core i5 or i7 processor. And those who need long battery life should likewise look for something else.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 31.01.2013
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: IT Reviews
EN→DE Archive.org versionThe new range of hybrid tablets and touchable laptops on the market now may offer better performance and battery life, but the Asus VivoBook X202E-DH31T puts touch capability into an affordable price range, which may make it worthwhile despite the flaws. Compared to other 10- to 12-inch touch-capable Windows 8 laptops, it’s cheap and usable, if not as portable and powerful as leading systems, like the Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 13.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 26.01.2013
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%
Quelle: CNet
EN→DE Archive.org versionI love the idea of touch-screen Windows 8 laptops dipping down close to $500. There are trade-offs to be sure, in processing power, input device quality, and battery life, and spending another $150 to $200 could make a big difference. But as far as $550 Windows 8 laptops go, the X202E is portable and useful, and worth a look for budget shoppers.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.01.2013
Bewertung: Gesamt: 77% Leistung: 70% Mobilität: 60%
Quelle: PC Mag
EN→DE Archive.org versionThe new range of hybrid tablets and touchable laptops on the market now may offer better performance and battery life, but the Asus VivoBook X202E-DH31T puts touch capability into an affordable price range, which may make it worthwhile despite the flaws. Compared to other 10- to 12-inch touch-capable Windows 8 laptops, it's cheap and usable, if not as portable and powerful as leading systems, like the Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 13. But the price is hard to beat, especially when compared with the budget laptop Editors' Choice Acer Aspire V5-571-6891, which is only $50 less, without touch.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 24.01.2013
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Laptop Mag
EN→DE Archive.org versionThis entry-level ASUS VivoBook X202E-DH31T provides a solid Windows 8 touch experience in a lightweight design for a tempting $549. Unfortunately, you'll need to bring the power cord with you, as this ultraportable is seriously lacking in battery life. While we don't recommend it either, at least the Acer Aspire V5-571, which also costs $549, offers a more powerful Core i5 processor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.12.2012
Bewertung: Gesamt: 50%
Quelle: 3DNews.ru
RU→DE Archive.org versionPositive: Aluminum cover; touch screen; price; extreme compact power supply. Negative: Reflection of the display.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.01.2013
Kommentar
Intel HD Graphics 4000: In Ivy Bridge Prozessoren (3. Generation Core) integrierte Grafikkarte in höchster Ausbaustufe. Je nach Prozessor (ULV bis Desktop Quad-Core) unterschiedlich getaktet.
Einige nicht anspruchsvolle aktuelle Spiele können mit geringen Details noch flüssig gespielt werden. Für Office und Video natürlich ausreichende Leistungsreserven.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
3217U:
Stromspar-Doppelkernprozessor mit nur 1.8 GHz Basisfrequenz. Integriert die Intel HD Graphics 4000 (jedoch nur mit 350 - 1050 MHz Taktung) und einen DDR3-1600 Speicherkontroller.
» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .

