, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6500

Intel Core 2 Duo P9600

► remove from comparison Intel P9600

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 ist ein sparsamer Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks der oberen Mittelklasse. Er gehört zur Penryn Serie und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Der Prozessor war in 2009 die schnellste 25 Watt (TDP) CPU. Der etwas schnellere P9700 braucht 3 Watt mehr.

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo P9600 ist vergleichbar mit dem ebenfalls mit 2.66 GHz getakteten Core 2 Duo T9550 und dadurch sollte sie für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen oder höherem Takt). Der alte Core 2 Quad Q9000 wird auch bei den meisten Anwendungen geschlagen, da er mit nur 2.0 GHz getaktet wird.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. 

Der Core 2 Duo P9600 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins)

Intel Core 2 Duo T6500

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 ist ein Einstiegsprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern, bietet jedoch nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache und ist mit 2.1 GHz relativ langsam getaktet. Im Vergleich zum vergleichbaren T6570, bietet der T6500 jedoch keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen VT-x.

Durch die mittelmäßige Taktfrequenz und den kleinen Level 2 Cache, kann die CPU bei modernen und anspruchsvollen Spielen durchaus limitieren (z.B. große Multiplayerschlachten bei Supreme Commander). Für die mittelmäßig anspruchsvolle (nicht professionelle) Anwendungen wie Office, Entry-Level Videoschnitt, Bildbearbeitung, Internet und casual Gaming sollte die Leistung jedoch ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P9600Intel Core 2 Duo T6500
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2660 MHz2100 MHz
FSB1066800
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
Technology45 nm1.05-1.212V45 nm
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketPGA478PGA478
FeaturesVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$348 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P9600Intel Core 2 Duo T6500

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2971 Points (27%)
min: 2197     avg: 2283     median: 2249 (20%)     max: 2487 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
5507 Points (8%)
min: 3800     avg: 4254     median: 4262 (6%)     max: 4757 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 1158.21     avg: 1172     median: 1171.6 (14%)     max: 1184.92 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 36.5     avg: 36.9     median: 37 (7%)     max: 37.237 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2375 Points (5%)
min: 1768     avg: 1856     median: 1879 (4%)     max: 1887 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 22     avg: 24.1     median: 24.5 (5%)     max: 25.584 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 54     avg: 58.3     median: 58.5 (3%)     max: 62.306 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 1339     avg: 1348     median: 1341 (6%)     max: 1363 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T6500 +
19458 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T6500 +
15381 MFLOPS (12%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 4087     avg: 4922     median: 5278 (33%)     max: 5522 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 5     avg: 5.1     median: 5.1 (73%)     max: 5.1 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 3945     avg: 4015     median: 4014.5 (4%)     max: 4084 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 → 77% n=3

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 28. 09:35:13

#0 checking url part for id 450 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 453 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:10:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.01s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 450 +0s ... 0.01s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#48 got single benchmarks 450 +0.007s ... 0.017s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 453 +0s ... 0.018s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.018s

#51 got single benchmarks 453 +0.024s ... 0.042s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.043s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.048s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.048s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#95 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.049s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#97 return log +0.004s ... 0.053s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)