Realme GT 7
Ausstattung / Datenblatt

Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (Sony IMX615, 1/2.74", f/2.4)
Preisvergleich
Durchschnitt von 44 Bewertungen (aus 88 Tests)
Testberichte für das Realme GT 7
Im Test will das realme GT 7 mit seiner hohen Leistung, smarten KI-Features, leistungsstarken 7.000-mAh-Akku sowie einem enorm hellen Display überzeugen. Ob dies in allen Bereich gelingt, erfahren Sie bei uns.
Quelle: Go2 Mobile

Das Realme GT 7 in der von uns getesteten Aston Martin Formula One Edition zeigt, dass es nicht nur farblich oder vom Design einiges her macht. Das Samsung-Display überzeugt auf ganzer Linie. Satte Farben, schnelle Reaktionen und ein hoher Dynamikumfang. Auch der Dimensity 9400e stellt unter Beweis, dass es nicht immer der teure Flaggschiff-Prozessor von Qualcomm sein muss. MediaTek hat sich über die Jahre hinweg an den kalifornischen Chip-Hersteller herangepirscht und beweist zu einem deutlich günstigeren Preis nahezu gleiches Potential. Die Triple-Kamera kann unabhängig von Tages- und Nacht-Aufnahmen überzeugen. Lediglich die Ultra-Weitwinkel-Kamera schwächelt ein wenig. Sollte das GT 7 Flaggschiff-Ansprüche haben, so ist im Grunde nur an dieser Stelle nachzubessern.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.09.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 88% Preis: 81% Leistung: 92% Ausstattung: 89% Mobilität: 99%
Quelle: ChinaMobileMag

Das Realme GT 7 in der China Version reiht sich bei den Performance-Preiskrachern ein und sticht in der Kategorie mit der Nutzung eines topaktuellen Prozessors hervor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 06.07.2025
Quelle: Smartzone

Das Realme GT 7 weiß zu überzeugen. Ein tolles Display mit schmalen Rändern, dazu ein riesiger Akku und das alles in einem dünnen und verhältnismäßig leichten Gehäuse.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Leistung: 85% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 95% Gehäuse: 90%
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: Htxt Africa
EN→DEA solid outing from Realme in South Africa. Forget about the Formula One padding, this is a really beautiful smartphone, with solid performance capabilities, a respectable camera array and an exceptional best-in-class battery. It is let down by small decisions like having an ugly cover case and confusing custom app icons, and its camera doesn’t quite match the best of the best for its price from other brands, but the performance hardware is there and we think it merits its pricing of R20 000, or R879 from Vodacom from 36 months. While there are phones that may do some categories better, like better camera with the Huawei Pura, and better performance with Galaxy devices, none do battery like the Realme. All told, a respectable mix of high class features makes this one a standout.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 12.12.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85%
Quelle: Soycincau
EN→DESo, is the Realme GT 7 Dream Edition a buy or a bin? I’d say it’s a buy — even if I’m not personally sold on its design. Then again, maybe I’m just not the target audience. For RM400 more than the standard Realme GT 7, you get a fancier unboxing experience, extra goodies, and exclusive Aston Martin Aramco F1 Team design touches inside and out. But as mentioned above, it’s been sold out since May this year. All’s not lost, though — the regular Realme GT 7 is still available for RM2,499 via Realme’s official stores on Shopee, Lazada, and TikTok Shop. If you’re shopping around, you might also want to consider alternatives like the Vivo V60, Honor 400 Pro, Oppo Reno 14 Pro, or Samsung Galaxy S25 FE — or simply wait for the next-gen Realme GT 8, which should make its global debut soon.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 10.10.2025
Quelle: Hitech Century
EN→DEThe realme GT 7 offers good bang for the buck with a massive battery, vibrant display and decent performance along with a good main camera for what you pay for.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 01.08.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84% Preis: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 100%
Quelle: CG Mag Online
EN→DEThe RealMe GT 7 is a really great device, but it falls short with not being able to do simple tasks like connecting to devices via bluetooth or using Google wallet.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 14.07.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%
Quelle: Lowyat.net
EN→DErealme GT 7Regardless of whether “Flagship Killer” is a fitting title, the realme GT 7 is a smartphone that can do it all, be it gaming or photography or simply just going back and forth between a million social media apps. There are a few minor drawbacks, like the lackluster wide-angle camera and a subdued design, but these aren’t necessarily dealbreakers. All in all, the phone is a powerhouse that doesn’t disappoint, and it’s definitely the one to buy if you’re looking for a premium phone but don’t have the resources to sink into a proper flagship. At RM2,599, the device is a pretty worthwhile purchase, if you ask me.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.06.2025
Quelle: Yugatech
EN→DEWrapping this review up, the realme GT 7 Dream Edition stands out as realme’s flagship smartphone that combines high-performance hardware, innovative features, and a design inspired by Formula One racing. Its collaboration with the Aston Martin Team adds a touch of luxury and exclusivity, making it an attractive option for users seeking both style and substance from their phones. But let’s not let the flashy design stir our impressions of this device, because it definitely has the raw performance to back up its flagship-killing claim.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 21.06.2025
Quelle: Cashify
EN→DEIn this Realme GT 7 Review, one thing is clear that the phone delivers big on battery life, display quality, and AI features. But fails to maintain that momentum when it comes to gaming performance and rear camera quality. With a 7,000mAh battery, 120W fast charging, and a 6,000 nits LTPO AMOLED screen, the GT 7 is a dream on paper. You also get AI tools like AI Eraser, Motion Deblur, and even AI gameplay suggestions during BGMI, which genuinely enhance the experience. However, the phone’s heating issues during extended gaming sessions are a deal-breaker, especially when rivals like the iQOO Neo 9 Pro with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 handle thermal loads more effectively. Similarly, the OnePlus 12 stands out for its cleaner UI and more consistent camera output, as well as its gaming capabilities.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.06.2025
Quelle: Techlusive
EN→DEIf you’re someone who prioritises performance, battery life, and doesn’t mind a phone that turns heads, the Realme GT 7 Dream Edition is definitely worth considering. Especially if you’re a fan of flashy and uniquely themed designs. What you are getting is a powerful performance, dependable battery backup, and fast charging. But here’s the catch: at Rs 49,999, you’re paying nearly Rs 10,000 more than the standard GT 7, which offers the same specs minus the Aston Martin-inspired look and UI. So, unless you are a fan of Formula One Racing or Aston Martin, love to hold a bold design phone, and a collector’s appeal matters a lot to you, the regular GT 7 might be the more sensible choice.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 18.06.2025
Quelle: The Mobile Indian
EN→DEFinally, for selfies, you can expect crispy results as the sharpness of the photo is high. Portrait photos have accurate edge detection as well. Skin tones are handled decently with an overall natural colour profile for the shots, unlike the vibrancy in the photos shots from the rear sensors. At Rs 39,999, the Realme GT 7 comes close to being a complete all-rounder, effortlessly managing most tasks—whether it's performance, battery life, smooth software experience, feature set, media consumption on its sharp display, or gaming. The cameras are solid overall, though the ultra-wide shots lack detail, and the entire camera system could benefit from some software optimisation. Still, with everything else it brings to the table, the Realme GT 7 easily earns our ‘Buy’ recommendation
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 89% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 85%
Quelle: 91mobiles
EN→DEThe Realme GT 7 undercuts competitors like the OnePlus 13R with its aggressive pricing and impressive all-around performance. The handset features an exceptional LTPO AMOLED display to start with. This is backed by a capable Dimensity 9400e SoC, which redefines performance within the segment, something that power users will appreciate. Moreover, with its advanced cooling system that ensures impressive thermal efficiency, the handset manages everyday tasks and heavy workloads with ease. Add to that, the smartphone features an impressive 7,000mAh battery and 120W fast charging, making it a reliable companion for users on the go. The similar features and performance are also available on the iQOO Neo 10 (review) at a significantly more affordable starting price of Rs 31,999.However, the Realme GT 7 outshines the iQOO offering with its versatile cameras that perform well in most scenarios. The 50MP primary and telephoto lenses produce sharp, natural-looking images, and the upgraded 32MP selfie camera is a noticeable improvement.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 09.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Leistung: 84% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 79%
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets
EN→DEThe Realme GT 7 is being marketed as a flagship killer phone, and I think that's a fair description. In everyday use, the GT 7 is a beast - whether it's battery, performance, or even the cameras. The AI feature additions make it more up-to-date in terms of the offerings we see from other players in the same price bracket. Design-wise, the GT 7 could have had a USP more than just a graphene back. Out of the two phones, the GT 7T wins the "who's the best-looking phone", and I'm only talking about the Racing Yellow colour variant of the 7T. Of course, if you consider all three GT 7 variants, then Realme GT 7 Dream Edition wins the competition hands down, but it also costs more.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 06.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 90% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Think Digit
EN→DEquality. But the Realme GT 7 strikes a good balance. It delivers solid, stable performance, reliable cameras, and long-lasting battery life, all for a starting price of ₹39,999. But as someone once said, “Even the best have their weaknesses.” And the GT 7? It’s no exception. So, shall we begin?
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 79% Leistung: 77% Gehäuse: 77%
Quelle: India Today
EN→DEThe Realme GT 7 is a well-rounded phone that delivers solid value under Rs 40,000. It nails the basics — with strong everyday performance, a large and bright display, long battery life, and surprisingly good charging speeds. Realme has also taken some bold steps with this phone, like the IP69 rating and a massive 7,000mAh battery, without making the device bulky or unattractive. While the camera setup is more than capable in daylight, it still has some inconsistencies especially in ultra-wide and low-light shots. If you are looking for a dependable daily driver with a flagship-like experience in most areas — especially battery, performance, and display — the GT 7 is a solid pick. It won’t outdo true flagships in every aspect, but at this price, it gets a lot right.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Yugatech

Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.05.2025
Quelle: Android Headlines
EN→DENow for the real question, should you buy the realme GT 7? Well, unfortunately, it’s not coming to the US. But I’m sure you already knew that. Having said that, I have been using it here in the US on T-Mobile and have gotten nearly identical network experience as with my OnePlus 13. So if you were to import it, you’d likely be perfectly fine. Given the starting price of €799.99, I do think this is a pretty competitive smartphone. However, if you’re looking for an incredible camera at this price, you might want to look elsewhere. For just a bit more, around €849, you can pick up the OPPO Find X8 which does have a better camera but slower charging and less battery capacity. The realme GT 7 seems really focused on longevity, with its 7,000mAh capacity battery and 120W charging. Also the fact that realme is touting the ability to play a game at 120fps for 7 hours straight on a single charge. If that’s what appeals to you, then the realme GT 7 is a great option.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Unbox
EN→DEWe’re only about to hit the middle of 2025, but realme has a serious contender on their hands with the realme GT 7. It hits all the marks when you talk about “flagship killers,” and the battery life just puts this on top for me if you need the lasting power. Sure, there is a bit of compromise when it comes to the cameras, but we all expect that of a phone in this price point as well. They’re good but not quite at that flagship level. We’re also sad and surprised about eSIMs locked for ORoaming purposes. It does boil down to preference here, since the competition is tough at this price point but–so far in 2025–the GT 7 has my vote if you’re to look at the power it has under the hood, how long it actually lasts, and how quick you’re able to top it.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.05.2025
Quelle: GSM Arena
EN→DEThe G7 is a well-rounded device with an excellent build, a bright and crisp OLED display, awesome battery life, fast charging, and a solid stereo speaker system. The Dimensity 9400e seems to be a very capable chip, easily putting out numbers comparable to and even better than last year's Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. It's not all sunshine and roses, though. For one, that powerful chipset we just mentioned doesn't stay all that powerful for long under heavy graphics loads. The other gripe we have with the GT 7 is that while decent, we could have gotten a 3x telephoto camera for the price tag Realme is asking here. And that leads us to our main point: while the Realme GT 7 is undoubtedly a great and well-rounded device, it seems to currently be priced a bit high considering what the competition often offers for less money. As such, it's definitely not a bad choice, but perhaps we would wait for the price to drop a bit or search for a good promo offer.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.05.2025
Quelle: Yanko Design
EN→DERealme launched the GT 7 Pro last November as the first smartphone equipped with the Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, showcasing top-tier performance. The non-Pro GT 7 followed in China this April, equipped with the Dimensity 9400+ chipset and a massive 7000mAh battery. Now, the GT 7 is making its way to the global market, though with a different chipset and some other specification changes. The Realme GT 7 is designed to deliver strong endurance thanks to its large 7000mAh battery, providing all-day power even under heavy use. This makes it especially appealing to mobile game enthusiasts and users who demand long-lasting performance without frequent recharging. Coupled with a capable chipset and efficient hardware, the phone balances power and battery life effectively. But is the Realme GT 7 a reliable companion for both intensive gaming sessions and everyday tasks? We put it to the test to find out.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.05.2025
Bewertung: Preis: 80% Leistung: 90% Ergonomie: 70%
Quelle: ben's gadget reviews

The Realme GT7 is here, with a 7000 mAh battery, a graphene body, and a new MediaTek Dimensity chip. The GT7 packs a 50-megapixel main camera and a 50-megapixel zoom lens, along with an ultrawide camera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.05.2025
Quelle: Computerhoy
ES→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Hipertextual
ES→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Xataka
ES→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Leistung: 78% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Tuexperto
ES→DEPositive: Impressive design; solid workmanship; high performance. Negative: Average cameras; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.07.2025
Quelle: Tuexperto
ES→DEPositive: Impressive design; powerful hardware; high performance; long battery life; quick charging. Negative: Average cameras; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 03.07.2025
Quelle: Tuexperto
ES→DEPositive: Powerful hardware; high gaming performance; very large battery capacity; beautiful display; affordable price. Negative: Average cameras; inflexible AI Features.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.06.2025
Quelle: Canaltech
PT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.08.2025
Quelle: Tudo Celular
PT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80%
Quelle: Canaltech
PT→DEPositive: Powerful hardware; excellent performance; impressive autonomy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 29.07.2025
Quelle: Wired IT
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Mister Gadget
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 27.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Preis: 85% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 98% Gehäuse: 86%
Quelle: Batista70Phone
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Ausstattung: 90% Bildschirm: 85% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: HDblog.it
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.05.2025
Bewertung: Ausstattung: 80%
Quelle: Multiplayer IT
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Mister Gadget
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Tutto Android
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: Everyeye.it
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: Smart World
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 24.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 76% Preis: 60% Ausstattung: 70% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 85% Gehäuse: 90% Ergonomie: 90%
Quelle: Techprincess IT
IT→DEPositive: Very large battery capacity; quick charging; beautiful display; powerful processor; high performance; nice main camera; good price. Negative: Average ultra-wide angle camera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 05.06.2025
Quelle: Igizmo
IT→DEPositive: Beautiful display; powerful hardware; high performance; impressive battery capacity; quick 120W charging; smart AI Features; elegant design; stereo speakers; affordable price. Negative: No charger included; heavy and bulky; average cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.05.2025
Quelle: Corriere
IT→DEPositive: Very large battery capacity; quick 120W charging; impressive cooling system; beautiful AMOLED 120Hz display; powerful hardware; high performance; waterproof IP69; smart AI Features. Negative: Average cameras; plastic case; high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.05.2025
Quelle: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade
IT→DEPositive: Powerful hardware; high performance; very large battery capacity; quick 120W charging; beautiful AMOLED display; premium design; solid workmanship. Negative: Average cameras; relatively heavy; high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.05.2025
Quelle: Ceotech
IT→DEPositive: High performance; impressive design; 16GB RAM; powerful processor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 27.05.2025
Quelle: L' Eclaireur FNAC
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 06.10.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100% Leistung: 100% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 100%
Quelle: Les Mobiles
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 24.09.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100%
Quelle: Presse Citron
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.07.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83% Preis: 75% Leistung: 80% Mobilität: 95% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Charles Tech
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 16.07.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Preis: 80% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 90%
Quelle: Journal du Geek
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 15.07.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: 01Net
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 02.07.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Preis: 60% Mobilität: 100%
Quelle: Les Numeriques
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 15.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 100% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 80% Ergonomie: 80%
Quelle: Frandroid
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 05.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Clubic
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 70% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: L' Eclaireur FNAC
FR→DEPositive: Powerful processor; great cameras; long battery life; smart AI Features; bright and beuatiful display. Negative: Lacking LTPO; unsupported wireless charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.05.2025
Quelle: Frandroid
FR→DEPositive: High performance; beautiful display; good cooling system; impressive battery life; elegant design. Negative: Poor night shots; mediocre ultra-wide angle camera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.05.2025
Quelle: CNet France
FR→DEPositive: Impressive battery capacity; very quick 120W charging; powerful hardware; high performance; nice cameras; good cooling system; affordable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.05.2025
Quelle: GSM Maniak
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.08.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 98% Mobilität: 100%
Quelle: Android.com.pl
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 22.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Tabletowo
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 14.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82%
Quelle: Mobileworld 24
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 81% Preis: 85% Leistung: 84% Bildschirm: 75% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: ITHardware.pl
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Telepolis
PL→DEVergleich, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Komputerswiat
PL→DEPositive: High performance; very long battery life; quick 120W charging; nice display; great main camera. Negative: Plastic case; unsupported wireless charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 20.06.2025
Quelle: Techno Strefa
PL→DEPositive: Impressive battery capacity; very quick charging; great AI cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 04.06.2025
Quelle: Unite4buy
PL→DEPositive: Powerful hardware; high performance; bright AMOLED display; impressive battery capacity; quick 120W charging; beautiful design; stereo speakers; 5G; NFC module. Negative: Unsupported wireless charging; average cameras; non-microSD card slot.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.05.2025
Quelle: Co Nowego
PL→DEPositive: Beautiful design; smooth performance; long battery life; quick charging; nice cameras; affordable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 27.05.2025
Quelle: GSM Online PL
PL→DEPositive: Very large battery capacity; quick 120W charging; bright display; powerful processor; excellent quad cameras; smart AI Features; affordable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.05.2025
Quelle: Instalki
PL→DEPositive: Large battery capacity; quick 120W charging; bright AMOLED display; high performance; waterproof IP68/IP69; decent cameras. Negative: Plastic case; mediocre AI Features.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.05.2025
Quelle: PurePC
PL→DEPositive: Powerful hardware; high performance; beautiful AMOLED 120Hz display; quick 120W charging; nice main camera; fast fingerprint sensor; elegant design; waterproof IP68/IP69; smart AI Features; good cooling system. Negative: Plastic case; poor ultra-wide angle camera; no charger included; unsupported wireless charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.05.2025
Quelle: Unite4buy
PL→DEPositive: Excellent performance; beautiful display; very large battery capacity; quick 100W charging; stereo speakers; 5G; NFC module; premium design; metal case. Negative: Average cameras; unsupported wireless charging and waterproof.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.04.2025
Quelle: Ferra.ru
RU→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Hi-Tech Mail
RU→DEPositive: Powerful hardware; high performance; long battery life; beautiful display; elegant design; support eSIM; decent main camera. Negative: Poor ultrawide angle camera; unsupported wireless charging; plastic case; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 19.06.2025
Quelle: 3DNews.ru
RU→DEPositive: Bright display; premium design; waterproof IP69; powerful processor; high performance; good cooling system; nice main camera; long battery life; quick charging; support eSIM. Negative: Overheats while using; unsupported wireless charging; no memory card slot; mediocre ultra-wide angle camera.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 17.06.2025
Quelle: 3DNews.ru
RU→DEPositive: Powerful hardware; high performance; very large battery capacity; quick 120W charging; great display; nice cameras; premium design; smart AI Features; waterproof IP69. Negative: Unsupported wireless charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 09.06.2025
Quelle: Hi-Tech Mail
RU→DEPositive: Very large battery capacity; quick 120W charging; impressive main camera; high gaming performance; waterproof.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 06.06.2025
Quelle: AndroidInsider.ru
RU→DEPositive: Decent hardware; smooth performance; impressive design; large battery capacity; quick charging; better price. Negative: Lack of advanced cooling system.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 04.06.2025
Quelle: 3DNews.ru
RU→DEPositive: Smooth performnace; nice display; good cooling system; large battery capacity; quick 120W charging; good main camera. Negative: Relatively heavy.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 27.05.2025
Quelle: Smartmania.cz
CZ→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90% Leistung: 93% Ausstattung: 84% Mobilität: 97% Gehäuse: 92%
Quelle: CNews.cz
CZ→DEPositive: Waterproof IP69; excellent AMOLED display; large ROM; high gaming performance; long battery life; compact size; nice video recording. Negative: Plastic case; bulky; unsupported wireless charging.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 05.06.2025
Quelle: XT Mobile
VN→DEPositive: Excellent display; powerful hardware; large battery capacity; nice triple cameras; support OIS mode. Negative: Mediocre ultra-wide angle camera; average gaming performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.05.2025
Quelle: Genk
VN→DEPositive: High performance; impressive autonomy; quick 120W charging; elegant design; great cameras; beautiful AMOLED display; smart AI Features.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 27.05.2025
Quelle: Jagat Review
ID→DEPositive: Powerful processor; beautiful AMOLED display; large battery capacity; quick 100W charging; wateproof IP68/IP69. Negative: No telephoto lens; without headphone jack; plastic case.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.05.2025
Quelle: M3 PC för alla
SV→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.09.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Arena IT
→DEPositive: Beautiful design; great AMOLED display; powerful hardware; high performance; impressive cameras; decent speakers; very long battery life; quick 120W charging; waterproof IP69 and dust avoiding. Negative: No charger included; many bloatwares; no microSD card slot; without headphone jack.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 30.05.2025
Quelle: Computerblog.ro
→DEPositive: Powerful processor; large battery capacity; beautiful display; affordable price. Negative: No memory card slot; without headphone jack.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 27.05.2025
Quelle: Puhelinvertailu
→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.07.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Kommentar
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12: High-End Grafikchip für Smartphones mit 12 der 16 möglichen Kernen. Basiert auf die neue "5th Gen" Architektur (Nachfolger von Valhall) inklusive Variable Rate Shading (VRS) und Ray Racing. Im Vergleich zum G715 sollen wieder 15% höhere Performance bei gleichen Taktraten möglich sein.
Diese Klasse ist noch durchaus fähig neueste Spiele flüssig darzustellen, nur nicht mehr mit allen Details und in hohen Auflösungen. Besonders anspruchsvolle Spiele laufen nur in minimalen Detailstufen, wodurch die grafische Qualität oft deutlich leidet. Diese Klasse ist nur noch für Gelegenheitsspieler empfehlenswert. Der Stromverbrauch von modernen Grafikkarten in dieser Klasse ist dafür geringer und erlaubt auch bessere Akkulaufzeiten.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
Dimensity 9400e: Schneller Mittleklasse-SoC für Smartphones und Tablets aus 2025 mit 8 Kernen in 2 Clustern. Vier große ARM Cortex-X4 Kerne mit bis zu 3,4 GHz werden vier A720 Kernen mit bis zu 2 GHz gegenübergestellt.» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .