Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7400

Intel Core 2 Duo T5550

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 ist ein Einstiegs-Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Merom-2M Kern und wird daher noch in 65nm gefertigt. Die Virtualisierungsfunktionen des Merom Kerns sind jedoch beim T5550 deaktiviert. Durch die geringe Taktrate, den relativ kleinen Cache und den langsamen FSB ist die Performance des T5550 limitiert und war auch in 2008 nur in der Einsteigerklasse anzusiedeln. Im Vergleich zu Pentium und Celeron Modellen, sollte der Core 2 Duo jedoch mehr Stromsparmechanismen bieten.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7400

► remove from comparison

Der Core 2 Duo T7400 ist ein Notebook-Doppelkernprozessor basierend auf den Merom Kern. In 2006 war die Leistung in der gehobenen Mittelklasse einzustufen, 2010 ist er nur noch als Einstiegsprozessor zu sehen. Die später erschienen auf Penryn Kern basierenden Core 2 Duo sind sparsamer und bei gleichem Takt etwas schneller. Daher ist der T7400 knapp unter einem Core 2 Duo P7450 einzuordnen.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5550Intel Core 2 Duo T7400
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1830 MHz2160 MHz
FSB667667
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
65 nm1.075V-1.250V65 nm1.0375-1.3V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPPGA478PBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T5550Intel Core 2 Duo T7400
$286 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T5550 +
1826 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T5550 +
3397 Points (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1484 Points (3%)
min: 1633     avg: 1817     median: 1861 (4%)     max: 1895 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T7400 +
257 Points (99%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T7400 +
min: 23     avg: 24     median: 24 (5%)     max: 25 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T7400 +
min: 58     avg: 59.3     median: 58 (2%)     max: 62 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T7400 +
min: 1523     avg: 1531     median: 1531 (7%)     max: 1539 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T7400 +
min: 13249     avg: 18264     median: 18263.5 (9%)     max: 23278 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T7400 +
min: 9696     avg: 12732     median: 12732 (10%)     max: 15768 MFLOPS
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T7400 +
683 Points (47%)
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
100%
1 T7400 +
2230 Points (92%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
100%
1 T7400 +
2080 Points (94%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T7400 +
min: 7174     avg: 7329     median: 7376 (99%)     max: 7438 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
3891 Points (24%)
min: 3716     avg: 4445     median: 4683 (29%)     max: 4859 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T5550 +
4.8 Points (69%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → 123% n=2

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 14. 20:52:38

#0 checking url part for id 390 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:13:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.004s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.005s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#38 composed specs +0s ... 0.005s

#39 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#40 getting avg benchmarks for device 390 +0s ... 0.006s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#42 got single benchmarks 390 +0.011s ... 0.018s

#43 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0s ... 0.018s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#45 got single benchmarks 164 +0.017s ... 0.035s

#46 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.035s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.036s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.037s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.04s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.041s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.044s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.045s

#74 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.045s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#76 return log +0.004s ... 0.049s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)