Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Ausstattung / Datenblatt

Secondary Camera: 20 MPix video recording up to 1080p@60fps
Preisvergleich
Durchschnitt von 27 Bewertungen (aus 51 Tests)
Testberichte für das Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro
Das Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro ist nicht in jeder Hinsicht top, schnürt aber ein starkes Gesamtpaket aus extrahellem AMOLED-Screen, besonders großem Akku und leistungsstarkem Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. Zur Smartphone-Spitzenklasse fehlen dem Preis-Leistungs-Sympathen eigentlich nur eine Zoomkamera und Features wie drahtloses Laden.
Quelle: ChinaMobileMag

Das Poco F7 Pro erweist sich als außergewöhnlicher Preis-Leistungs-Kracher, welcher in seiner Preisklasse ab mittlerweile 360 Euro kaum Konkurrenz zu fürchten hat.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.06.2025
Quelle: PC Welt

Mit dem Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, einem atemberaubenden 2K-AMOLED-Display, IP68-Wasser- und Staubresistenz und blitzschnellem Aufladen bietet das Poco F7 Pro echte Flaggschiff-Qualitäten.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 21.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Chip.de

Trotz seines erschwinglichen Preises beeindruckt das Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro in vielen Bereichen - teilweise sogar mehr als so manche Topmodelle. Besonders das brillante 6,7-Zoll-OLED-Display überzeugt mit gestochen scharfer Darstellung.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 94% Leistung: 97% Ausstattung: 94% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 98%
Quelle: Smartzone

Wie so oft bei Xiaomi ignorieren wir die überhöhte UVP und orientieren uns stattdessen am voraussichtlich realistischen Straßenpreis von etwa 350 €, den das Poco F7 Pro in naher Zukunft erreichen dürfte.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 88% Leistung: 100% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%
Quelle: Gamestar

In seinem Preisbereich ist das Poco F7 Pro quasi konkurrenzlos – vor allem weil es direkt zum Start schon einen hohen Rabatt auf das Smartphone gibt.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Ausländische Testberichte
Quelle: The Indian Express
EN→DEWith a starting price of Rs 31,999, the latest Poco F series device once again emerges as one of the best value for money smartphones you can buy this year. The solid and power-efficient Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset, combined with the fluidity of HyperOS 2, makes this an easy recommendation for both casual gamers and normal users who just want a big battery phone. However, hardcore gamers can look towards alternatives like the Infinix GT 30 Pro (review), which is much cheaper and offers haptic triggers, or the iQOO Neo 10R (review), which has the same chipset sans the throttling issues.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 01.08.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: GSM Arena

Poco F7 or F7 Pro? Both pack flagship power, but the F7 gives you a bigger screen and battery, while the Pro counters with a sharper 1440p display and potentially, faster performance. Tough call? Check out this HEAD-TO-HEAD for the COMPLETE BREAKDOWN of how these two phones compare in terms of screen quality, battery life and charging speed, chipset performance, and camera image quality, all based on our extensive reviews.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 10.07.2025
Quelle: Yugatech

Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 03.07.2025
Quelle: Tech Spurt

The POCO F7 should suit most users just fine, offering strong value for money. Sure you don't get the Ultra's telephoto lens, but the camera tech is still decent, while you can once again get gaming on Wuthering Waves. However, unlike the POCO F7 Pro and Ultra, the regular model does get quite toasty with games. Battery life is sublime on all three, and in fact the vanilla phone is better with its upgraded capacity. That said, it's still the POCO F7 Ultra that offers the fastest charging and wireless support. You've got a gorgeous AMOLED screen with HDR10 and Dolby Vision support in all three smartphones, although the more expensive models boast a boost to the resolution.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.06.2025
Quelle: GSM Arena

Poco's back with a double punch—F7 Pro vs F7 Ultra! Both pack serious power for the price, but the Ultra brings a sleeker build and a brighter display, while the Pro keeps things a bit more budget-friendly. You’re looking at near-identical performance under the hood, but camera tuning and battery optimizations might sway your pick. So, which one gives more bang for your buck?
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.05.2025
Quelle: Amateur Photographer
EN→DEThere’s many different mid-range models available to choose from at the moment, with many offering a good set of photo specs for the money. If you want something that offers a good array of features – not just camera wise – then the Poco F7 Pro is a good choice. The camera performs well too, but you also get a large bright screen, impressive battery life and even 8K video recording should you need it. Of course it’s not perfect. There’s no dedicated macro mode, low light shooting isn’t amazing, and there’s no telephoto lens. Still, for the price paid the results are pretty good. Probably the biggest downside here is the lack of availability in some big territories, such as the US – but if you’re in one of the places where this sells, it’s well worth a look.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 28.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Trusted Reviews
EN→DEAt the price point where the Poco F7 Pro sits, there are definitely more balanced phones with cleaner, more intuitive software and better cameras. But you’re not likely to find one that’s as fast or powerful. And that has always been the beauty of the Poco flagships. It’s not one for those whose top priority is a good camera, but it is one for those who want a phone that can cope with absolutely anything, lasts a solid chunk of time on a full charge and then refills quickly when you need it full again. Personally, I’d take a slightly lower-powered phone with a more balanced feature set and cleaner, less bloaty software. But for the right person, this might just be the dream £500 phone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 28.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Hardware Zone
EN→DELike last year's series, we feel this year's Poco F7 phones offer great value for money. This is especially true for users who are more specs-focused and on a tight budget. Poco F7 Pro's flagship-tier hardware, great performance, and long-lasting battery life are undeniably excellent for its price, but the phone isn't rated E for Everyone. If you’re looking for an all-around great experience, you might be somewhat annoyed with the amount of bloatware and ads the phone ships with. You can uninstall the bloatware and manually disable notifications for the first-party apps, but we would rather not have this problem at all.The phone is less suitable for people who take more photos than play mobile games. It lacks a dedicated telephoto lens, and the ultrawide camera doesn't meet our expectations.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 24.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 75% Preis: 90% Leistung: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: GSM Arena

The Poco F7 Pro by Xiaomi stays true to the lineup's key principles by offering plenty of performance and a solid camera quality at a reasonable price. Check out our video review to learn ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW about the phone's top features, build and screen quality, battery life, performance, and camera image quality.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 23.04.2025
Quelle: Android Guys
EN→DEThe POCO F7 Pro doesn’t try to be everything for everyone, but what it does aim to do, it nails. Between the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chip, vibrant 2K OLED display, massive 6000mAh battery, and impressively fast 90W charging, this phone punches far above its price tag in all the areas that count for power users. It’s not chasing camera awards, and it skips a few conveniences like wireless charging; however, that’s the tradeoff for delivering true flagship-grade performance at a mid-range price. Awarded to products with an average rating of 3.75 stars or higher, the AndroidGuys Smart Pick recognizes a balance of quality, performance, and value. It stands out in design, innovation, and user experience, delivering great functionality at a competitive price. For gamers, heavy multitaskers, and anyone who values speed and battery life over bells and whistles, this phone feels like a steal.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 16.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 82% Preis: 80% Leistung: 90% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: OI Spice Tech News
EN→DEXiaomi Poco F7 Pro and Poco F7 Ultra are fantastic phones. Both of them push the limits and provide a flagship killer deal. The F7 Pro receives a bigger battery capacity and is offered at a desirable price. On the other hand, the F7 Ultra has faster charging, wireless charging, a powerful chipset, and overall great camera results. The rest of the specs are the same. If you could do without the extra bits of the Ultra model and like to save some money, then the F7 Pro would be a perfect choice. Nevertheless, if you want the full-fledged flagship experience, then the Poco F7 Ultra is a no-brainer. However, if you want to spend your money wisely, consider checking the Realme GT 7 Pro. It might be the best gaming phone in the flagship killer category. As always, the final decision is in your hands, so choose the phone according to your needs.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 12.04.2025
Quelle: Yugatech

Vergleich, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.04.2025
Quelle: Phandroid
EN→DEWhile it’s not officially available in North America, the POCO F7 Pro’s sub-$600 price gives it an edge over competing devices within the same price range, and its biggest highlights are no doubt its powerful chipset, impressive display, and capable battery. While its camera will be good for most everyday situations, shortcomings such as the modest low-light performance and limited front video recording are factors to consider; there’s also the rather bloated UI, although in-depth customization features somewhat make up for this. All in all though, the POCO F7 shines in the areas where it matters, especially for buyers after a flagship-grade handset that won’t burn a hole through their savings.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.04.2025
Quelle: Tech Spurt

However, for £500 UK there's a lot to like here. I'm not a fan of that design, it's not my favourite, but many people think the Poco F7 Pro smartphone looks lovely. That AMOLED screen is a stunner and the stereo speakers are plenty powerful. Likewise, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 can handle Wuthering Waves, Genshin Impact and other memory-sucking games. The Poco F7 Pro's camera setup is limited, especially vs the Ultra or the Nothing Phone 3a duo. No telephoto zoom, just a basic ultra-wide shooter, that's it. All the same, this blower is one of the best mid-range phones for capturing photos of your family thanks to the nippy shutter speed. Nice.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.04.2025
Quelle: Root Nation
EN→DEThis smartphone can truly be considered a flagship killer. It’s super powerful, features an excellent display with no flaws (in fact, it’s the same one found in a flagship that costs almost 50% more). There are no compromises in terms of build protection, the battery life is record-breaking for recent times, and the charging speed is on point. Where does the Poco F7 Pro fall short? The base model has insufficient memory, there’s no charger included in the box, and the cameras, while good, are somewhat limited for their price. Overall, the Poco F7 Pro stands strong in its right to be part of the Pocophone flagship killer lineup and deserves my recommendation.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 08.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Preis: 90% Leistung: 100% Mobilität: 100%
Quelle: Root Nation
EN→DEДаний смартфон дійсно можна вважати вбивцею флагманів. Він супер-продуктивний, має виключно крутий дисплей без недоліків (власне, такий самий встановлено і в безпосередньо флагман, що майже на 50% дорожчий). Тут немає просадок по захисту корпуса, автономність - рекордна за останні часи, і зарядка на рівні.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 07.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 86% Preis: 90% Leistung: 100% Mobilität: 100%
Quelle: Phone Arena
EN→DEWell, here we are. The final verdict. The Poco F7 Pro is a pretty decent phone. It carries over many good things from the Ultra model, such as the great screen and the decent main camera. But it also makes some sacrifices, featuring a year-old chipset and a pretty mediocre ultrawide camera. Oh, and there's no wireless charging on board. Then again, the phone comes with a 6,000 mAh battery and offers amazing battery life, and the overall aesthetics are also quite pleasing. At the end of the day, the price tag is the main drawback of this model. At 599 euros (just 100 down from the Ultra model), the sacrifices are too many to justify the cost. You can get a OnePlus 13R or wait for the upcoming Pixel 9a and probably get a better bang for your bucks.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 31.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 66% Leistung: 74% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 82% Gehäuse: 70%
Quelle: GSM Arena
EN→DEThe F7 Pro is just like the F6 Pro, only a year newer. That means it's staying true to the lineup's key principles and it's offering plenty of performance at a reasonable price and it's even doing really well in the imaging department. There are some aspects that rubbed us the wrong way. The selfies aren't exactly wow-material. There is no wireless charging, and the lack of eSIM support will limit its use to frequent travelers. And you have to get an extra charger to get the speediest possible charging (at least in the EU). Still, the Poco F7 Pro packs a potent Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chip that's hard to find elsewhere at this price point, even more than a year after its release.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 84%
Quelle: Canbuyornot
EN→DEPerhaps I have been testing too many Xiaomi phones recently, but the Poco F7 Pro feels generic (dual-tone design aside). I miss the days when Poco phones were different, and not another Xiaomi phone (but with round icons instead of square ones). Thankfully, the Poco F7 Pro remains a “flagship killer” like previous models, especially at its retail price (S$669 for 256GB and S$729 for 512GB). You get good performance with some flagship niceties at an attractive price. But the battery stamina is the highlight here. Get it now from Shopee and Lazada. Those who order before April 9 can get S$30 off, and either the Xiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro or the Redmi Buds 5 Pro as free gifts.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr kurz, Datum: 27.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Yugatech
EN→DEIn conclusion, I'm happy to report that the POCO F7 Pro still deserves to be called a flagship killer, and it definitely delivers. Flagship-grade performance, a crisp high-refresh 2K display, great build quality and battery life, and even an ultrasonic in-display fingerprint scanner! Samsung better wake up! Because Xiaomi and its POCO army are definitely stirring the pot. So, if you're looking for a device that excels in gaming, multimedia, and everyday performance without breaking the bank, the POCO F7 Pro might be the one for you.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.03.2025
Quelle: Tech Advisor
EN→DEThe Poco F7 Pro is, once again, a flagship killer in the truest sense. It doesn’t try to do everything – but what it does, it nails… mostly. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers ridiculous performance for the price, the 2K AMOLED screen is simply gorgeous, and battery life is top-tier. Add in 90W charging, IP68 water and dust resistance, and some smart AI features, and you’ve got one of the most well-rounded phones at this end of the market. Sure, the ultrawide camera is basic, there’s some bloatware to remove, and I would love to see a brighter display that you can actually use outdoors – but these are nitpicks in the face of what you’re getting overall. With such an aggressive price, I think that the F7 Pro is one of the best value buys of 2025. If you care more about everyday speed, battery, and visuals than bleeding-edge camera features, the Poco F7 Pro is the phone to beat. Just be sure that the more expensive Poco F7 Ultra wouldn’t suit you better.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Yugatech

Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.03.2025
Quelle: TechTablets

Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 21.03.2025
Quelle: TechTablets

Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 20.03.2025
Quelle: Tudo Celular
PT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80%
Quelle: 4G News
PT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 90%
Quelle: Target HD
PT→DENegative: Non-microSD card slot; poor cameras; slow USB 2.0 ports; many bloatwares; relatively high price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 03.04.2025
Quelle: Target HD
PT→DEPositive: Powerful processor; 12GB RAM; 512GB ROM; great GPU; impressive AMOLED display; professional cameras; large battery capacity; quick charging; affordable price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 01.04.2025
Quelle: Mister Gadget
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 18.04.2025
Quelle: Tutto Android
IT→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 02.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade
IT→DEPositive: Powerful processor; high performance; nice display; impressive autonomy; great main camera; affordable price; premium design; waterproof IP68. Negative: No telephoto lens; poor secondary and selfie camera; unsupported eSIM and wireless charging; no charger included.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.04.2025
Quelle: Techprincess IT
IT→DEPositive: Great display; high performance; impressive battery life; attractive price. Negative: Average cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 04.04.2025
Quelle: AndroidWorld.nl
NL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 08.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: 01Net
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 22.07.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80% Preis: 80% Bildschirm: 60% Mobilität: 100%
Quelle: Frandroid
FR→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 28.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 70% Gehäuse: 80%
Quelle: Tabletowo
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 83%
Quelle: GSM Maniak
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 26.05.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 89% Leistung: 90% Bildschirm: 90% Mobilität: 90%
Quelle: Techno Strefa
PL→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 03.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%
Quelle: Co Nowego
PL→DEPositive: Powerful hardware; high performance; beautiful AMOLED display; long battery life; quick charging; premium design; good price. Negative: Average cameras; unsupported wireless charging; overheats while using; heavy and bulky.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 17.06.2025
Quelle: Unite4buy
PL→DEPositive: Great AMOLED display; decent hardware; nice performance; large battery capacity; elegant design; waterproof IP68; stereo speakers; NFC module; 5G. Negative: Plastic case; unsupported wireless charging; average cameras.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 21.03.2025
Quelle: Hi-Tech Mail
RU→DEPositive: High performance; excellent display; modern design; affordable price. Negative: Unsupported wireless charging & eSIM; slippery case.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.05.2025
Quelle: MobilArena HU
HU→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.08.2025
Bewertung: Preis: 80% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 100%
Quelle: Selular
ID→DEPositive: Decent hardware; big screen; beautiful display; great cameras; attractive price. Negative: Inflexible AI Features; average gaming performance.
Vergleich, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 29.06.2025
Quelle: M3 PC för alla
SV→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 17.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 95%
Quelle: Mobil.se
SV→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 15.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 78% Bildschirm: 80%
Quelle: Mobile-com JP
JA→DEEinzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 10.06.2025
Bewertung: Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 100% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 80%
Kommentar
Qualcomm Adreno 750: Grafikchip für Smartphones und Tablets, integriert im Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SoC. Schnellster Grafikchips für Smartphones gegen Ende 2023 und schlägt auch die GPU im Apple A17 Pro (iPhone 15 Pro).
Diese Klasse ist noch durchaus fähig neueste Spiele flüssig darzustellen, nur nicht mehr mit allen Details und in hohen Auflösungen. Besonders anspruchsvolle Spiele laufen nur in minimalen Detailstufen, wodurch die grafische Qualität oft deutlich leidet. Diese Klasse ist nur noch für Gelegenheitsspieler empfehlenswert. Der Stromverbrauch von modernen Grafikkarten in dieser Klasse ist dafür geringer und erlaubt auch bessere Akkulaufzeiten.
» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.
SD 8 Gen 3: High-End SoC (System on a Chip) für Smartphones welcher Ende 2023 vorgestellt wurde. Integriert unter anderen einen schnellen Cortex-X4 "Prime Core" mit bis zu 3,3 GHz und 3 weitere schnelle Cortex-A720 3,2 GHz. Zwei weitere schnelle A720 (3 GHz) befinden sich im dritten Cluster. Zum Stromsparen wurden außerdem zwei weitere ARM Cortex-A520 Kerne mit 2,3 GHz verbaut. Integriert ein 5G Modem, WiFi 7 und eine deutlich schnellere AI Engine.» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .