Asus Vivobook 16 X1607QA

Ausstattung / Datenblatt

Preisvergleich

Testberichte für das Asus Vivobook 16 X1607QA

87% ASUS Vivobook 16 X1607Q Review: Portable, Versatile, and Affordable
Quelle: Root Nation EN→DE
This laptop is a solid workhorse. Its 16 GB of RAM is sufficient for handling large numbers of documents as well as streaming video, movies, and TV shows. The backlit keyboard is comfortable, although it has some quirks. The design feels well-made, and the options for peripherals and data transfer are comprehensive. However, be aware that the 8 cores running at 3 GHz may limit performance for demanding tasks, and the integrated graphics will restrict gaming capabilities. The only clear downside I see with the ASUS Vivobook 16 X1607Q is its weak display. Everything else can be justified by either the battery life or the price point. This laptop is designed as an office or home workhorse.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.08.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 100%

ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) Review – Big Screen | Surprisingly Capable | Windows on ARM Gets Real
Quelle: Mobygyaan EN→DE
The ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606QA) positions itself as a forward-thinking Windows laptop built on Qualcomm’s next-gen Snapdragon X architecture. The Copilot+ PC is designed for students, professionals, and casual users who prioritize screen real estate and practical usability over flashy aesthetics, and those who want a balance of sleek design, silent operation, vibrant visuals, and AI-ready performance with exceptional battery efficiency. Overall, the ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) is a solid performer aimed at productivity-focused users seeking a large screen, reliable daily performance, and decent build – all without breaking the bank. While app compatibility is still catching up for some x64 softwares and AAA games, the laptop runs most productivity and entertainment tools without a hitch – and native ARM64 apps are lightning fast.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 29.07.2025

ASUS Vivobook 16 X1607 review – A 20-Hour Battery and One Unforgivable Flaw
Quelle: Laptop Media EN→DE
The ASUS Vivobook 16 X1607QA is a fascinating machine, but one that presents a very clear set of compromises. It wraps a surprisingly premium-feeling and robust chassis around a platform built for one thing above all else: efficiency. This is not an all-rounder; it’s a specialized tool for users whose priorities are firmly set on mobility, connectivity, and, most of all, unplugged longevity. For the right user, this Vivobook could be a dream come true, but for others, its significant drawbacks in key areas will be immediate deal-breakers. It’s a laptop of extremes that demands you know exactly what you need.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.06.2025

How to open ASUS Vivobook 16 X1607 - disassembly and upgrade options
Quelle: Laptop Media
Support, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 25.06.2025

87% ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) Review
Quelle: Exhibit.tech EN→DE
The ASUS Vivobook 16 is a solid choice in the budget laptop market, delivering great portability, battery life (10–14 hours), and performance for everyday tasks. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon X processor is efficient for office work and web browsing, complemented by a full-sized keyboard and good port selection. However, the display is less suitable for creative work, and performance struggles with heavy multitasking or gaming. Priced ₹59,990, it offers good value compared to x86 competitors. While not the top performer, its balance of efficiency and affordability makes it a strong option for students and casual users.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 03.06.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Leistung: 80% Mobilität: 90% Gehäuse: 90%

85% ASUS Vivobook 16 (X1607QA) Review: Snapdragon X Power on a Student Budget
Quelle: 91mobiles EN→DE
The ASUS Vivobook 16 X1607QA isn’t just another budget laptop — it represents a real shift in what users can expect from affordable Windows machines. Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X platform, previously confined to expensive flagships and tablets, now powers a laptop that costs less than many entry-level Intel and AMD-based systems. What ASUS has pulled off is genuinely impressive. They’ve taken the promise of ARM — exceptional efficiency, low heat, instant responsiveness — and made it accessible at a mass-market price point. For everyday users who live in browsers, documents, video calls, and light creative tools, this machine delivers an experience that feels premium, without the premium price tag. Performance is snappy, battery life is class-leading, and the thermals are so quiet and cool.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 30.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 85% Leistung: 85% Bildschirm: 80% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 75%

70% Asus Vivobook 16 review: A cut above most budget laptops
Quelle: Digital Trends EN→DE
The Asus Vivobook 16 has its benefits and drawbacks, but I’ll start with the former list first. The entry-level ARM machine is ideal for folks who want to run the basic software or get most work done online without exhausting the battery quickly or without spending much on a new laptop. Its toughness ratings make it equally good for students, allowing them to be somewhat careless once in a while. Charging over USB-C is another advantage and lets you forget about carrying a separate charger always. The Vivobook 16 compromises on the productivity front, and is unsuitable for creative professionals, unless they treat it as a backup machine only. For a little extra, Asus itself has exciting options, such as the Asus Vivobook S15 or the Zenbook A14.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 27.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%

70% Asus Vivobook 16 (2025) review: It’s not glamorous, but it’s affordable
Quelle: Laptop Mag EN→DE
The Asus Vivobook 16 (2025) offers decent performance, long battery life, a smooth touchpad, and a big screen. I’m not the biggest fan of the Vivobook 16, but it is a solid Windows 11 laptop. The biggest issue I have with it right now is its price. The Acer Aspire 14 AI is cheaper and it offers a clicky keyboard and slightly longer battery life. However, if you really want a 16-inch budget laptop, the Vivobook 16 is a decent choice.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Mittel, Datum: 04.04.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 70%

ASUS Vivobook 16 Affordable Snapdragon X Laptop For Students & Work
Quelle: TechTablets
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 11.03.2025

80% Asus Vivobook 16 Snapdragon X review: Still bang for the buck?
Quelle: Techlusive EN→DE
Wrapping up our Asus Vivobook 16 review this Snapdragon X unit is a future-proof proposition. This a thin, light, and durable laptop for a 16-inch machine, and it has decent performance on offer. But I think an example is the best way I can explain this laptop to the right kind of buyer. Let’s say you’re a parent who wants to buy your kid a laptop that can run all the necessary software and have just enough power to let them explore AI, then this is a good choice. If you’re a working professional who needs something with a big screen and a numpad, good choice for you too. However, if you’re someone who wants a laptop that can edit photos & videos, and allow you to play AAA games on it. Or if you’re willing to carry a heavy machine and always have a power socket around, you could sacrifice the Vivobook’s sensibility to go with a gaming laptop.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Kurz, Datum: 10.03.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 80%

87% Recenzja ASUS Vivobook 16 X1607Q: autonomiczny, wszechstronny, niedrogi
Quelle: Root Nation PL PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 09.08.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Preis: 100% Leistung: 80% Ausstattung: 90% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 80%

87% Огляд ASUS Vivobook 16 X1607Q: автономний, універсальний, недорогий
Quelle: Root Nation PL PL→DE
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 08.08.2025
Bewertung: Gesamt: 87% Preis: 100% Leistung: 80% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 100% Gehäuse: 80%

华硕 Vivobook 16 X1607 评测–20 小时电池和一个不可原谅的缺陷
Quelle: Laptopmedia CN zh-CN→DE
Positive: Long battery life; premium design; great built quality; excellent connectivity; good cooling and silent system. Negative: Low sRGB coverage; non-expandable RAM; average performance.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 25.06.2025

Kommentar

Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS: Die Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-45 ist die schwächste GPU in the Snapdragon X Plus SoCs mit nur 1,7 statt 3,8 TFLOPS an Leistung. Wahrscheinlich wird dies durch weniger Taktraten und / oder weniger Kerne erreicht.

Durch aktuell eingeschränkten Treibersupport und Spieleunterstüztung ist die 3D-Leistung und Kompabilität in Spielen jedoch nicht vergleichbar mit Nvidia und AMD iGPUs.

Diese Klasse ist noch durchaus fähig neueste Spiele flüssig darzustellen, nur nicht mehr mit allen Details und in hohen Auflösungen. Besonders anspruchsvolle Spiele laufen nur in minimalen Detailstufen, wodurch die grafische Qualität oft deutlich leidet. Diese Klasse ist nur noch für Gelegenheitsspieler empfehlenswert. Der Stromverbrauch von modernen Grafikkarten in dieser Klasse ist dafür geringer und erlaubt auch bessere Akkulaufzeiten.

» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.

SD X1-26-100: Eine erschwingliche ARM-Architektur Prozessor (SoC) für den Einsatz in Windows-Notebooks. Der 8-Kern Snapdragon X Chip verfügt über 8 Oryon CPU-Kerne, die mit bis zu 2,98 GHz laufen, zusammen mit der 1,7 TFLOPS X1-45 Adreno iGPU und der 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU. Der superschnelle LPDDR5x-8448 Speichercontroller, den wir von anderen Snapdragon X Chips kennen, USB 4.0 Unterstützung, TB 4 Unterstützung und PCIe 4 Unterstützung sind ebenfalls an Bord.» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .

Ähnliche Geräte mit den selben Spezifikationen

Geräte anderer Hersteller

Geräte eines anderen Herstellers und/oder mit einer anderen CPU

Geräte mit der selben Grafikkarte

Geräte mit der selben Bildschirmgröße und/oder ähnlichem Gewicht