, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Xeon E-2186M vs Intel Xeon E-2176M

Intel Xeon E-2186M

► remove from comparison Intel E-2186M

Der Intel Xeon E-2186M ist ein mobiler Sechskern-High-End-Prozessor für professionelle Notebooks. Im Vergleich zum Consumer Core i9-8950HK, bietet der E-2186M ECC Support für den Hauptspeicher und dafür keinen freien Multiplikator zum Übertakten der CPU-Kerne.

Die sechs CPU-Kerne takten mit 2,9 - 4,8 GHz (Ein- und Zweikern Turbo) bzw maximal 4,3 GHz wenn alle Kerne ausgelastet sind. Die 4,8 GHz können nur per "Thermal Velocity Boost" kurzzeitig erreicht werden (CPU Temperatur unter 50°C). Unter den 50°C kann ein Kern um 200 MHz geboostet werden, mehrere um 100 MHz.

Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört auf den Namen UHD Graphics 630 und entspricht der alten HD Graphics 630. Die Leistungsaufnahme ist mit 45 Watt TDP spezifiziert. Parallel zum Core i9-8950HK gehört der E-2186M zu den schnellsten Notebook-Prozessoren in 2018 und ist der schnellste mobile Xeon-Prozessor.

Die einzelnen Kerne haben sich bei Coffee Lake im Vergleich zu Kaby Lake nicht verändert. Die Leistung pro Takt bleibt also gleich und Coffee Lake kann nur durch die leicht verbesserte Fertigung (14nm++) und die zusätzlichen Kerne punkten. Auch die Grafikkarte wurde nicht verbessert, sondern lediglich teilweise höher getaktet.

Mit einem spezifizierten TDP von 45 Watt eignet sich der Xeon E-2186M am besten für große und schwere Notebooks.

Intel Xeon E-2176M

► remove from comparison Intel E-2176M

Der Intel Xeon E-2176M ist ein mobiler Sechskern-High-End-Prozessor für professionelle Notebooks. Im Vergleich zum Consumer Core i7-8850H, bietet der E-2176M ECC Support für den Hauptspeicher, 12 MB L3 Cache (+3 MB) und ist schneller getaktet (+100 MHz). Die sechs CPU-Kerne takten mit 2,7 - 4,4 GHz (Ein- und Zweikern Turbo) bzw maximal 4,1 GHz wenn alle 6 Kerne ausgelastet sind. 

Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört auf den Namen UHD Graphics 630 und entspricht der alten HD Graphics 630. Die Leistungsaufnahme ist mit 45 Watt TDP spezifiziert. Hinter dem Spitzenmodell E-2186M ist der E-2176M die zweitschnellste Xeon-CPU.

Die einzelnen Kerne haben sich bei Coffee Lake im Vergleich zu Kaby Lake nicht verändert. Die Leistung pro Takt bleibt also gleich und Coffee Lake kann nur durch die leicht verbesserte Fertigung (14nm++) und die zusätzlichen Kerne punkten. Auch die Grafikkarte wurde nicht verbessert, sondern lediglich teilweise höher getaktet.

Mit einem spezifizierten TDP von 45 Watt eignet sich der Xeon E-2176M am besten für große und schwere Notebooks.

ModelIntel Xeon E-2186MIntel Xeon E-2176M
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-HCoffee Lake-H
Serie: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
Intel Core i9-9980HK compare2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-9880H compare2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-8950HK compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1212 MB
» Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Xeon E-2276M compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-9850H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-9750H compare2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-8850H compare2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 129 MB
Intel Core i7-8750H compare2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 129 MB
Intel Core i5-9400H compare2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-9300HF compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-9300H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-8400H compare2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-8300H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i3-8100H compare3 GHz4 / 48 MB
Intel Core i9-9980HK compare2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-9880H compare2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i9-8950HK compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Xeon E-2276M compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-9850H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-9750H compare2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
» Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-8850H compare2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 129 MB
Intel Core i7-8750H compare2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 129 MB
Intel Core i5-9400H compare2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-9300HF compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-9300H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-8400H compare2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-8300H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i3-8100H compare3 GHz4 / 48 MB
Clock2900 - 4800 MHz2700 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache12 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 126 / 12
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1098 Points (11%)
min: 987     avg: 1067     median: 1095 (11%)     max: 1118 Points
06012018024030036042048054060066072078084090096010201080Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 169     avg: 182     median: 187 (65%)     max: 189 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 9.32     avg: 11.3     median: 12.3 (23%)     max: 12.4 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 1.99     avg: 2.1     median: 2 (58%)     max: 2.12 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 6928     avg: 7681     median: 6973 (62%)     max: 9142 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 31923     avg: 35912     median: 32132 (44%)     max: 43681 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 147.028     avg: 163     median: 163.3 (2%)     max: 179.63 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 4.909     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (1%)     max: 5.77 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 3947     avg: 4625     median: 4624.5 (30%)     max: 5302 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 58.24     avg: 63.1     median: 63.1 (29%)     max: 67.87 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 195.75     avg: 204     median: 203.5 (55%)     max: 211.25 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 E-2176M +
8.7 fps (19%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 0.601     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (23%)     max: 0.756 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (23%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 6.1     avg: 6.9     median: 6.9 (25%)     max: 7.6 GB/s
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 465.79     avg: 510     median: 510.1 (4%)     max: 554.41 Seconds
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 7203     avg: 9007     median: 9757 (21%)     max: 10061 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 8.508     avg: 8.6     median: 8.6 (2%)     max: 8.69 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 18.777     avg: 19     median: 19 (1%)     max: 19.26 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 475.198     avg: 477     median: 477 (2%)     max: 478.8 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 38520     avg: 39431     median: 39431 (40%)     max: 40342 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 10234     avg: 11628     median: 11727 (42%)     max: 12923 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 30521     avg: 44313     median: 44313 (28%)     max: 58105 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 30553     avg: 43412     median: 43412 (39%)     max: 56271 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 59124     avg: 59647     median: 59646.5 (55%)     max: 60169 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 5617     avg: 8399     median: 9331 (24%)     max: 10250 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 11097     avg: 13737     median: 14418 (36%)     max: 15696 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 3916     avg: 4729     median: 4728.5 (26%)     max: 5541 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 4077     avg: 4660     median: 4660 (54%)     max: 5243 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 19388     avg: 20690     median: 20689.5 (26%)     max: 21991 Points
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E-2186M +
1248 Points (61%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E-2186M +
5239 Points (18%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 1047.5     avg: 1054     median: 1053.7 (1%)     max: 1059.9 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 E-2176M +
76.2 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 35521     avg: 36102     median: 36101.5 (49%)     max: 36682 Points
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 E-2176M +
88.9 Watt (24%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 E-2176M +
12.6 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon E-2186M → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon E-2176M → 100% n=1

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 20. 06:04:10

#0 checking url part for id 9902 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9904 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:10:47 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#23 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#24 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 9902 +0s ... 0.009s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#27 got single benchmarks 9902 +0.006s ... 0.015s

#28 getting avg benchmarks for device 9904 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#30 got single benchmarks 9904 +0.011s ... 0.027s

#31 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.013s ... 0.04s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.044s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.046s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#108 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.053s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#110 return log +0.004s ... 0.058s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)